ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01654536

A 6 Month Safety Study Of Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol (Zetonna®) And Ciclesonide Nasal Spray (Omnaris®) In Subjects 12 Years And Older With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)

NCT01654536, Phase 4, Completed, Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.; results first posted 2014-07-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A 6 Month Safety Study Of Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol (Zetonna®) And Ciclesonide Nasal Spray (Omnaris®) In Subjects 12 Years And Older With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR). Trials, record NCT01654536. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01654536

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A 6 Month Safety Study Of Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol (Zetonna®) And Ciclesonide Nasal Spray (Omnaris®) In Subjects 12 Years And Older With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)
NCT number
NCT01654536
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
737 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
Conditions
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
ciclesonide nasal aerosol, ciclesonide nasal spray
First posted
2012-07-31
Last updated
2014-07-24
Results first posted
2014-07-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)0-6 months
PrimaryThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)0-6 months
SecondaryThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Nasal AEs.0-6 months
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Nasal AEs.0-6 months
SecondaryThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs.0-6 months
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs.0-6 months
SecondaryThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).0-6 months
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).0-6 months
SecondaryThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs Causing Study Medication Discontinuation.0-6 months
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs Causing Study Medication Discontinuation.0-6 months

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Nasal AEs.0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Nasal AEs.0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs.0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs.0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs Causing Study Medication Discontinuation.0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent AEs Causing Study Medication Discontinuation.0-6 months
Safety Population: The safety population consisted of all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The safety population was expected to be the same as the ITT population. However, if there were any subjects who were mis randomized, the actual treatment taken would have been used for the analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group456

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal AerosolAny Nasal Mucosal Disorder, Septum Disorder, or Na3participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal SprayAny Nasal Mucosal Disorder, Septum Disorder, or Na4participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal AerosolNasal Mucosal Disorder2participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal SprayNasal Mucosal Disorder0participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal AerosolNasal Septum Disorder0participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal SprayNasal Septum Disorder0participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal AerosolNasal Septum Ulceration1participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal SprayNasal Septum Ulceration4participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal AerosolNasal Septum Perforation0participants
The Number of Subjects Experiencing Nasal Mucosal Disorders, Septum Disorders, or Nasal Septum Perforations as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; TEAE)Ciclesonide Nasal SprayNasal Septum Perforation0participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol368
Overall StudySTARTEDCiclesonide Nasal Spray369
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol324
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCiclesonide Nasal Spray331
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol44
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCiclesonide Nasal Spray38

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEPISTAXISRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol2236728
otherEPISTAXISRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersCiclesonide Nasal Spray2637028
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol03670
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersCiclesonide Nasal Spray13701
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol03670
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersCiclesonide Nasal Spray13701
seriousBile duct stenosisHepatobiliary disordersCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol03670
seriousBile duct stenosisHepatobiliary disordersCiclesonide Nasal Spray13701
seriousAppendicitisInfections and infestationsCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol03670
seriousAppendicitisInfections and infestationsCiclesonide Nasal Spray13701

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol
Total, all-cause mortalityCiclesonide Nasal Spray
Total, other adverse eventsCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol22367
Total, other adverse eventsCiclesonide Nasal Spray26370
Total, serious adverse eventsCiclesonide Nasal Aerosol4367
Total, serious adverse eventsCiclesonide Nasal Spray5370

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol vs Ciclesonide Nasal Spray: Number of Subjects With Increase ≥ 7 mm Hg From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure, or a Change to > 21 mm Hg, in Either EyeTrial comparisons
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol vs Ciclesonide Nasal Spray: Number of Subjects With Development of or Worsening in Lens Opacities.Trial comparisons
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol vs Ciclesonide Nasal Spray: Number of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity.Trial comparisons
Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol vs Ciclesonide Nasal Spray: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01654536

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01654536/results?page=2