ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01657019

Results by group39

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of SafetyAll ParticipantsAny TEAE84.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of SafetyAll ParticipantsSerious TEAEs2.8percentage of participants
Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)All ParticipantsSuicidal behavior0participants
Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)All ParticipantsActive suicidal ideation2participants
Number of Participants With a Positive Response on The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)All ParticipantsNon-suicidal self-injurious behavior3participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleAll ParticipantsVisit 1 (Week 1), n=58953.795% Confidence Interval 49.6 to 57.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleAll ParticipantsVisit 4 (Week 4), n=57288.595% Confidence Interval 85.8 to 91.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleAll ParticipantsVisit 9 (Week 24), n=46692.795% Confidence Interval 90.3 to 95.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleAll ParticipantsVisit 16 (Week 52), n=36995.495% Confidence Interval 93.2 to 97.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Improved Response on The Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleAll ParticipantsEnd of Treatment, n=59789.995% Confidence Interval 87.5 to 92.3percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in The Global Score for The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)All ParticipantsVisit 4 (Week 4), n=483-1.66Standard Deviation 1.156units on a scale
Change From Baseline in The Global Score for The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)All ParticipantsVisit 9 (Week 24), n=391-1.95Standard Deviation 1.271units on a scale
Change From Baseline in The Global Score for The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)All ParticipantsVisit 16 (Week 52), n=314-1.95Standard Deviation 1.261units on a scale
Change From Baseline in The Global Score for The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)All ParticipantsEnd of Treatment, n=503-1.90Standard Deviation 1.284units on a scale
Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For MobilityAll ParticipantsI have no problems in walking about91.2percentage of participants at ET
Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For MobilityAll ParticipantsI have slight problems in walking about6.8percentage of participants at ET
Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For MobilityAll ParticipantsI have moderate problems in walking about1.4percentage of participants at ET
Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For MobilityAll ParticipantsI have severe problems in walking about0.4percentage of participants at ET
Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For MobilityAll ParticipantsI am unable to walk about0.2percentage of participants at ET
Percentage of Participants With a Response to The EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) For Self CareAll ParticipantsI have no problems washing or dressing myself97.1percentage of participants at ET

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01657019/results