ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01662648

Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Paliperidone Extended-Release (ER) in Participants With Schizophrenia

NCT01662648, Phase 3, Completed, Janssen Pharmaceutica; results first posted 2014-03-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Paliperidone Extended-Release (ER) in Participants With Schizophrenia. Trials, record NCT01662648. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01662648

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Paliperidone Extended-Release (ER) in Participants With Schizophrenia
NCT number
NCT01662648
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,117 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutica
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Interventions
Paliperidone ER
First posted
2012-08-10
Last updated
2014-05-05
Results first posted
2014-03-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26Week 26
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening. Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 20 % improvement in PANSS total score is reported here. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
The Positive Subscale of PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assesses seven positive-symptoms of schizophrenia. Positive symptoms refer to an excess of or distortion of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
The Negative Subscale of PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assesses seven negative-symptoms of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms represent a diminution or loss of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
The CGI rating scale is a 7-point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 indicates to "normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 indicates "among the most extremely ill participants". Higher scores indicate worsening. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
The PSP scale assesses the degree of dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care and disturbing and aggressive behavior. The score ranges from 1 to 100, divided into 10 equal intervals to rate the degree of difficulty (1, absent to 6, very severe) in each of the 4 domains. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have a mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; less or equal to 30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
Sleep quality was assessed by an 11-point visual analog scale that rates how well participants sleep. Participants indicated on the scale (from 0 to 100 millimeter) how well they have slept in the previous 7 days (from 0: "very badly" to 100: "very well"). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
Daytime Drowsiness was assessed by an 11-point visual analog scale that rates how well participants sleep. Participants indicated on the scale (from 0 to 100 millimeter) how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days (from 0: "not at all" to 100:"all the time"). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction ScoreBaseline and Week 26
Participants were interviewed at baseline and at the end of the trial (Week 26) to assess their satisfaction with the current treatment on a 5-point scale (very good, good, reasonable, moderate or poor). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
Intent to Treat (ITT) population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone extended-release (ER) at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.
millimeter (mm)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.
millimeter (mm)MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction ScoreBaseline and Week 26
ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment.N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time point.
participantsNUMBER

Results by group50

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of EfficacyBaseline85.19Standard Deviation 24.97units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or OtherBaseline65.45Standard Deviation 28.48units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of EfficacyWeek 26-26.60Standard Deviation 28.24units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or OtherWeek 26-20.52Standard Deviation 30.05units on a scale
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy72.83percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other71.87percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of EfficacyBaseline21.04Standard Deviation 7.15units on a scale
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or OtherBaseline15.26Standard Deviation 7.53units on a scale
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of EfficacyWeek 26-7.17Standard Deviation 7.67units on a scale
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or OtherWeek 26-5.07Standard Deviation 7.88units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy520
Overall StudySTARTEDPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other597
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy373
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other419
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy147
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other178

Adverse events148

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherExtrapyramidal disorderNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy34512
otherExtrapyramidal disorderNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other21587
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy23512
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other24587
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy16512
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other22587
otherAkathisiaNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy13512
otherAkathisiaNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other18587
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy9512
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other20587

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy
Total, all-cause mortalityPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other
Total, other adverse eventsPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy208512
Total, other adverse eventsPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other239587
Total, serious adverse eventsPaliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy35512
Total, serious adverse eventsPaliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other29587

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy vs Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01662648

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01662648/results?page=2