ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01664923

Safety and Efficacy Study of Enzalutamide Versus Bicalutamide in Men With Prostate Cancer

NCT01664923, Phase 2, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2016-05-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy Study of Enzalutamide Versus Bicalutamide in Men With Prostate Cancer. Trials, record NCT01664923. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01664923

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study of Enzalutamide Versus Bicalutamide in Men With Prostate Cancer
NCT number
NCT01664923
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
396 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Enzalutamide, Bicalutamide
First posted
2012-08-14
Last updated
2019-01-30
Results first posted
2016-05-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.
PFS was defined as time from randomization to earliest objective evidence of prostate specific-antigen (PSA) progression, radiographic progression, or death on study. PSA progression was defined as ≥ 25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir and was to be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment. Radiographic progression in bone was based on The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines defined as at least 2 new lesions on bone scan. Radiographic progression in soft tissue on Computerized Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MRI) was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). CT/MRI and bone scans were read locally by the same radiologist (or nuclear medicine physician for interpretation of bone scans) whenever possible. Participants not known to have had a PFS event at the time of the analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last assessment.
SecondaryTime to PSA ProgressionFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.
PSA progression was defined as ≥ 25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir and was to be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment at least 3 weeks later. Participants not known to have had PSA progression were censored at the date of last PSA assessment.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a PSA Response ≥ 50%From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.PSA response was defined as a reduction in PSA of at least 50% from baseline at any post baseline assessment confirmed by a second PSA assessment at least 3 weeks later.
SecondaryDuration of Radiographic PFSFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.
Duration of radiographic PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic disease progression or death on study and was to be evaluated for participants with metastatic disease at study entry. Radiographic disease progression in bone was based on PCWG2 guidelines defined as at least 2 new lesions on bone scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI was based on RECIST 1.1. CT/MRI and bone scans were read locally by the same radiologist (or nuclear medicine physician for interpretation of bone scans) whenever possible. Participants not known to have had radiographic progression at the time of analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last radiographic assessment.
SecondaryQuality of Life: Time to Degradation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.
The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess patient function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score (0 to 156) with higher scores representing better quality of life. Time to degradation of FACT-P was defined as the time from randomization to first assessment with at least a 10-point decrease from baseline in the global FACT-P score for each participant. Participants with no score degradation at the time of analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last assessment showing no degradation.
SecondaryBest Overall Soft Tissue ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.
Best overall soft tissue response is defined as partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) while on study treatment based on investigator assessment of target, nontarget, and new lesions using RECIST 1.1. Only participants in the metastatic population with measurable soft tissue disease (at least 1 target lesion identified per RECIST 1.1) at screening were included in the analysis. All percentages are based on number of participants with metastatic and measurable soft tissue disease at screening in each treatment group.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From first dose of study drug until the end of open label phase (up to maximum duration of 65 months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE defined as an event that emerged during treatment period (From first dose of study drug until end of open label phase \[up to maximum duration of 65 months\]) that was absent before treatment, or worsened during treatment period relative to pre-treatment state. AE included both serious and non- SAE. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An AE was considered related to study drug if event was assessed by investigator as probably or possibly related.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.Intent-to-treat population: all participants randomly assigned to study treatment.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to PSA ProgressionFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.Intent-to-treat population: all participants randomly assigned to study treatment.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a PSA Response ≥ 50%From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.Evaluable intent-to-treat population: all participants randomly assigned to study treatment and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline PSA measurement.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Radiographic PFSFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.All participants with metastatic disease at study entry and randomly assigned to study treatment.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life: Time to Degradation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.Intent-to-treat population: all participants randomly assigned to study treatment.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYBest Overall Soft Tissue ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.All participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and had metastatic and measurable soft tissue disease at screening.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From first dose of study drug until the end of open label phase (up to maximum duration of 65 months)Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Enzalutamide19.495% Confidence Interval 16.5 to NAmonths
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Bicalutamide5.795% Confidence Interval 5.6 to 8.1months
Time to PSA ProgressionEnzalutamideNA95% Confidence Interval 19.4 to NAmonths
Time to PSA ProgressionBicalutamide8.395% Confidence Interval 5.7 to 8.5months
Percentage of Participants With a PSA Response ≥ 50%Enzalutamide81.395% Confidence Interval 75.0 to 86.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PSA Response ≥ 50%Bicalutamide31.395% Confidence Interval 24.8 to 38.3percentage of participants
Duration of Radiographic PFSEnzalutamideNA95% Confidence Interval 16.7 to NAmonths
Duration of Radiographic PFSBicalutamide8.395% Confidence Interval 8.1 to 11.1months
Quality of Life: Time to Degradation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)Enzalutamide8.495% Confidence Interval 6.3 to 11.4months
Quality of Life: Time to Degradation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)Bicalutamide8.395% Confidence Interval 6.1 to 11.1months

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsSTARTEDEnzalutamide198
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsSTARTEDBicalutamide Then Enzalutamide198
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsReceived Study TreatmentEnzalutamide197
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsReceived Study TreatmentBicalutamide Then Enzalutamide198
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsCOMPLETEDEnzalutamide93
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsCOMPLETEDBicalutamide Then Enzalutamide38
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsNOT COMPLETEDEnzalutamide105
Period1:Double Blind Phase-29 MonthsNOT COMPLETEDBicalutamide Then Enzalutamide160
Period 2: Open-label Phase-36 MonthsSTARTEDEnzalutamide93
Period 2: Open-label Phase-36 MonthsSTARTEDBicalutamide Then Enzalutamide38

Adverse events2,553

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersEnzalutamide15197
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDB Phase: Bicalutamide6198
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOpen Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide137
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersEnzalutamide29197
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersDB Phase: Bicalutamide33198
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersOpen Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide637
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEnzalutamide26197
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDB Phase: Bicalutamide29198
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersOpen Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide937
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEnzalutamide38197

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEnzalutamide
Total, all-cause mortalityDB Phase: Bicalutamide
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide
Total, other adverse eventsEnzalutamide187197
Total, other adverse eventsDB Phase: Bicalutamide179198
Total, other adverse eventsOpen Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide3637
Total, serious adverse eventsEnzalutamide76197
Total, serious adverse eventsDB Phase: Bicalutamide60198
Total, serious adverse eventsOpen Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide1637

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26811535DERIVEDPubMed
30189902DERIVEDPubMed
34621011DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01664923

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01664923/results?page=2