ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01675882

Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy

NCT01675882, Phase 2, Completed, DBV Technologies; results first posted 2021-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy. Trials, record NCT01675882. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01675882

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy
NCT number
NCT01675882
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
221 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
DBV Technologies
Conditions
Peanut Allergy
Interventions
Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg, Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg, Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg, Viaskin Placebo
First posted
2012-08-30
Last updated
2021-10-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-002550-32
Results first posted
2021-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationAt Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a \>=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a \>=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a \>=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a \>=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationAt Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at the screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryMean Cumulative Reactive Dose of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationAt Month 12
The peanut protein cumulative reactive dose was defined as the sum of all peanut protein doses up to and including the eliciting dose ingested during the peanut challenge. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Severity of Symptoms Based on the Oral Food Challenge (OFC) Symptom Score Sheet at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationBaseline and Month 12
The symptoms of erythematous rash, pruritus, urticaria/angioedema, rash, sneezing/itching, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, laryngeal symptoms (example, throat clearing, occasional cough, hoarseness, frequent dry cough, inspiratory stridor), wheezing, subjective complaints, objective complaints and cardiovascular symptoms (example, color change, weakness, dizziness, mental status change, tachycardia, decreased blood pressure, etc) were observed. The OFC score ranges from 0 to 3 for each symptom (0=Absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe). The total symptom score for each participant was calculated. Higher scores indicate worst outcome. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationAt Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)At Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized. Only participants in the range of 6-11 years of age are reported.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)At Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized. Only participants in the range of 12-17 years of age are reported.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)At Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized. Only participants in the range of 18-55 years of age are reported.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationAt Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized.mgMEAN
SECONDARYMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)At Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized. Only participants in the range of 6-11 years of age are reported.mgMEAN
SECONDARYMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)At Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized. Only participants in the range of 12-17 years of age are reported.mgMEAN
SECONDARYMean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)At Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized. Only participants in the range of 18-55 years of age are reported.mgMEAN
SECONDARYMean Cumulative Reactive Dose of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationAt Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized.mgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Severity of Symptoms Based on the Oral Food Challenge (OFC) Symptom Score Sheet at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationBaseline and Month 12The full analysis set included all participants who were randomized.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group256

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationViaskin Peanut 50 μg45.395% Confidence Interval 31.56 to 59.55percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationViaskin Peanut 100 μg41.195% Confidence Interval 28.10 to 55.02percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationViaskin Peanut 250 μg50.095% Confidence Interval 36.34 to 63.66percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall PopulationPlacebo25.095% Confidence Interval 14.39 to 38.37percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)Viaskin Peanut 50 μg57.195% Confidence Interval 37.18 to 75.54percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)Viaskin Peanut 100 μg46.295% Confidence Interval 26.59 to 66.63percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)Viaskin Peanut 250 μg53.695% Confidence Interval 33.87 to 72.49percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)Placebo19.495% Confidence Interval 7.45 to 37.47percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)Viaskin Peanut 50 μg33.395% Confidence Interval 13.34 to 59.01percentage of participants
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)Viaskin Peanut 100 μg10.595% Confidence Interval 1.30 to 33.14percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDViaskin Peanut 50 μg53
Overall StudySTARTEDViaskin Peanut 100 μg56
Overall StudySTARTEDViaskin Peanut 250 μg56
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo56
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDViaskin Peanut 50 μg51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDViaskin Peanut 100 μg49
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDViaskin Peanut 250 μg53
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo54
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDViaskin Peanut 50 μg2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDViaskin Peanut 100 μg7

Adverse events228

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEye swellingEye disordersViaskin Peanut 50 μg1531
otherEye swellingEye disordersViaskin Peanut 100 μg2563
otherEye swellingEye disordersViaskin Peanut 250 μg3563
otherEye swellingEye disordersPlacebo0560
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersViaskin Peanut 50 μg5539
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersViaskin Peanut 100 μg3566
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersViaskin Peanut 250 μg2562
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3566
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersViaskin Peanut 50 μg2532
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersViaskin Peanut 100 μg4564

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityViaskin Peanut 50 μg053
Total, all-cause mortalityViaskin Peanut 100 μg056
Total, all-cause mortalityViaskin Peanut 250 μg056
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo056
Total, other adverse eventsViaskin Peanut 50 μg5353
Total, other adverse eventsViaskin Peanut 100 μg5556
Total, other adverse eventsViaskin Peanut 250 μg5656
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5156
Total, serious adverse eventsViaskin Peanut 50 μg253
Total, serious adverse eventsViaskin Peanut 100 μg156

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29136445DERIVEDPubMed
30978404DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01675882

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01675882/results?page=2