ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01678924

A Safety and Efficacy Study of AGN-214868 in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

NCT01678924, Phase 2, Terminated, Allergan; results first posted 2020-01-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Safety and Efficacy Study of AGN-214868 in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia. Trials, record NCT01678924. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01678924

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Safety and Efficacy Study of AGN-214868 in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia
NCT number
NCT01678924
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
280 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Neuralgia, Postherpetic
Interventions
AGN-214868, AGN-214868 Placebo (Vehicle)
First posted
2012-09-05
Last updated
2020-01-07
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-002240-24
Results first posted
2020-01-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes50

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1Baseline to Week 12
The average pain intensity score at each week was the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported in the patient's eDiary during each 7-day period, starting with the day of study treatment injection. Patients used the 11-point Likert scale, with anchors at 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" Baseline was defined as the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported during the baseline period for the 7 days immediately prior to the treatment.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 2Baseline to Week 12
The average pain intensity score at each week was the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported in the patient's eDiary during each 7-day period, starting with the day of study treatment injection. patients used the 11-point Likert scale, with anchors at 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" Baseline was defined as the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported during the baseline period for the 7 days immediately prior to the treatment.
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 1Baseline to Week 1Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 3Baseline to Week 3Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4
Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease), and in 10% increments, up to 100% improvement, in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 5Baseline to Week 5Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 6Baseline to Week 6Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 7Baseline to Week 7Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline
SecondaryPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Outcomes50

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1Baseline to Week 12
Two cohorts of patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) were randomized to receive 1 treatment of either AGN-214868 (cohort 1: 32.5 or 65 μg; cohort 2: 130 μg) or placebo. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the modified intent to treat (mITT) population
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 2Baseline to Week 12
Two cohorts of patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) were randomized to receive 1 treatment of either AGN-214868 (cohort 1: 32.5 or 65 μg; cohort 2: 130 μg) or placebo. Cohort 2 includes 125 patients from the mITT population
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 1Baseline to Week 1
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 3Baseline to Week 3
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 5Baseline to Week 5
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 6Baseline to Week 6
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 7Baseline to Week 7
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8
The total modified intent to treat (mITT) population of 279 patients, consists of all randomized patients who received treatment and at least 1 post-baseline weekly average pain intensity score. Cohort 1 includes 154 patients from the mITT population
percentage of patientsNUMBER

Results by group180

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 65µgWeek 1-0.8895% Confidence Interval -1.249 to -0.538units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 32.5µgWeek 1-1.0295% Confidence Interval -1.380 to -0.587units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1PlaceboWeek 1-1.1195% Confidence Interval -1.425 to -0.808units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 65µgWeek 2-1.3395% Confidence Interval -1.746 to -0.968units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 32.5µgWeek 2-1.5695% Confidence Interval -1.963 to -1.017units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1PlaceboWeek 2-1.5795% Confidence Interval -1.970 to -1.174units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 65µgWeek 3-1.6695% Confidence Interval -2.143 to -1.203units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 32.5µgWeek 3-1.9395% Confidence Interval -2.426 to -1.227units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1PlaceboWeek 3-1.8495% Confidence Interval -2.248 to -1.388units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1AGN 214868 65µgWeek 4-1.7895% Confidence Interval -2.277 to -1.310units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAGN 214868 130µg64
Overall StudySTARTEDAGN 214868 65µg63
Overall StudySTARTEDAGN 214868 32.5µg30
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAGN 214868 130µg54
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAGN 214868 65µg51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAGN 214868 32.5µg28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo105
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAGN 214868 130µg10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAGN 214868 65µg12

Adverse events128

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersAGN 214868 130µg664
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersAGN 214868 65µg163
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersAGN 214868 32.5µg030
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersPlacebo6123
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsAGN 214868 130µg464
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsAGN 214868 65µg563
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsAGN 214868 32.5µg130
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo8123
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsAGN 214868 130µg364
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsAGN 214868 65µg563

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAGN 214868 130µg
Total, all-cause mortalityAGN 214868 65µg
Total, all-cause mortalityAGN 214868 32.5µg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsAGN 214868 130µg1564
Total, other adverse eventsAGN 214868 65µg1563
Total, other adverse eventsAGN 214868 32.5µg830
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo30123
Total, serious adverse eventsAGN 214868 130µg264
Total, serious adverse eventsAGN 214868 65µg863

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01678924

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01678924/registered?page=2