ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01687296

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate VS Oral Prednisone in Chinese Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

NCT01687296, Phase 3, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2018-01-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate VS Oral Prednisone in Chinese Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma. Trials, record NCT01687296. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01687296

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate VS Oral Prednisone in Chinese Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma
NCT number
NCT01687296
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
261 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Asthma
Interventions
fluticasone propionate inhalation solution, oral prednisone, placebo inhalation solution, placebo tablet, salbutamol
First posted
2012-09-18
Last updated
2018-06-20
Results first posted
2018-01-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationDays 2 to 8
PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants (if needed with the help of parents or guardian) recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the morning before taking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used for analysis. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 4 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with effects due to gender, age, centre and treatment group.
PrimaryMean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) PopulationDays 2 to 8
PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants (if needed with the help of parents or guardian) recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the morning before talking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used for analysis. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 5 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with effects due to gender, age ,centre and treatment group.
SecondaryMean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodDays 1/2 to 8
PEF is the maximum flow generated during a forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation. Participants recorded on diary card the best of three PEF measurements, using a mini-Wright peak flow meter in the evening (6:00-9:00 post meridiem \[PM\]) before taking any study drug. Only data that was drawn from Days 1/2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used for analysis. If participants started to take the study drug in the morning (early or on 12:00 PM), only then the evening PEF on the date of randomization was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days was recorded in the given treatment assessment period. Two participants from fluticasone propionate group and 5 participants from prednisone group had the missing outcome measure. Analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to gender, age, centre and treatment group.
SecondaryMedian Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodDays 2 to 8
The symptoms of cough, sputum production, wheeze and dyspnoea were assessed in morning and evening, and recorded on participant diary cards. Day-time symptoms were scored while retiring to bed on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe). Night-time symptoms were scored while waking in the morning on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe). For day-time score, only data that was from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used. For night-time score, only data that are from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and on or before one day after the end date of study drug was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. The analysis only includes participants with at least 2 days of non-missing symptom scores in the given treatment assessment period.
SecondaryMedian Number of Use of Rescue Medications During Day and Night Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodDays 2 to 8
The use of nebulized salbutamol (doses/puffs and frequency) were recorded on diary card in the morning and evening. The median numbers of times of use of rescue medication during day and night was calculated for each participant over the treatment assessment period. In each case, only data that was from Days 2 to 8 after randomization and before or on the end date of study drug was used. The outcome measure was considered missing if less than 2 days (that is., 24-hour periods) were recorded in the given treatment assessment period. The analysis only includes participants who have at least 2 days of non-missing numbers of times rescue medication (including zero) in the given treatment assessment period.
SecondaryClinical Assessment of Lung Function of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) During the Treatment PeriodDuring the treatment period at Day 5, Day 8
Spirometric assessments of FEV1 and FVC were assessed at clinic visit 1 (Screening), 2 (Day 5) and 3 (Day 8). Lung function tests were performed at the approximately same time at each visit in the morning. Participants were instructed to withhold salbutamol therapy for at least 4 hour, and the highest of three FEV1 and FVC measurements were recorded. If participants discontinued before or on Day 5, then the FEV1 and FVC collected at the early withdrawal visit is included in the Visit 2. Otherwise, the FEV1, FVC collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA with covariates of gender, centre, age and treatment.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Scoring Index at Day 5 and Day 8Baseline, Day 5 and Day 8
The clinical scoring index was assessed at Baseline (Visit 1), Day 5 and Day 8. The score assigned represented the sum of the score for each of four signs: respiratory rate, wheezing, inspiration/expiration ratio, and accessory muscle use. Each of these parameters were scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 12, where 0 indicated absence of symptoms and 12 indicated most severe symptoms. The Baseline value was the last non-missing value prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated/defined as value at the indicated visit minus value at the Baseline. A negative value of change in score from Baseline indicated improvement in severity of symptoms. If participants discontinued before or on Day 5, then the clinical scoring index collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 2. Otherwise, the clinical scoring index collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3
SecondaryMean Global Evaluation for Efficacy by Participant/Parent and InvestigatorDay 8
At Visit 3 (Day 8), participant/parent and investigator were asked to evaluate efficacy globally as very beneficial=1, beneficial=2, no effect=3 or worse=4. The global evaluation collected at the early withdrawal visit was included in the Visit 3. If participants were discontinued at Visit 2, then the global evaluation collected at the Visit 2 is also included in the Visit 3 for summary and analysis.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationDays 2 to 8ITT Population comprised of all participants randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study drug. Data is presented for the participants available at the time of assessment.Litres per minute (L/min)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYMean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) PopulationDays 2 to 8
PP Population comprised of all participants in the ITT Population who did not have any full protocol violations which could impact treatment effect. Data is presented for the participants available at the time of assessment.
L/minLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodDays 1/2 to 8ITT Population. Data is presented for the participants available at the time of assessment.L/minLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMedian Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodDays 2 to 8ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.Scores on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYMedian Number of Use of Rescue Medications During Day and Night Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodDays 2 to 8ITT Population. Data is presented for the participants available at the time of assessment.Number of use of rescue medicationMEDIAN
SECONDARYClinical Assessment of Lung Function of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) During the Treatment PeriodDuring the treatment period at Day 5, Day 8ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.LitresLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Scoring Index at Day 5 and Day 8Baseline, Day 5 and Day 8ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Global Evaluation for Efficacy by Participant/Parent and InvestigatorDay 8ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.Scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationFluticasone Propionate188.77Standard Error 3.774Litres per minute (L/min)
Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationPrednisone188.31Standard Error 3.790Litres per minute (L/min)
Mean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) PopulationFluticasone Propionate189.46Standard Error 3.724L/min
Mean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) PopulationPrednisone188.96Standard Error 3.712L/min
Mean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodFluticasone Propionate195.79Standard Error 3.723L/min
Mean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodPrednisone194.63Standard Error 3.751L/min
Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodFluticasone PropionateDay-time symptom score0.5Full Range 0 to 3Scores on a scale
Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodPrednisoneDay-time symptom score1.0Full Range 0 to 3Scores on a scale
Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodFluticasone PropionateNight-time symptom score0.0Full Range 0 to 3Scores on a scale
Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodPrednisoneNight-time symptom score0.0Full Range 0 to 4Scores on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFluticasone Propionate123
Overall StudySTARTEDPrednisone128
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFluticasone Propionate116
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPrednisone123
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFluticasone Propionate7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPrednisone5

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherWhite blood cell count increasedInvestigationsFluticasone Propionate1123
otherWhite blood cell count increasedInvestigationsPrednisone10128
seriousUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsFluticasone Propionate1123
seriousUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPrednisone2128

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFluticasone Propionate0123
Total, all-cause mortalityPrednisone0128
Total, other adverse eventsFluticasone Propionate1123
Total, other adverse eventsPrednisone10128
Total, serious adverse eventsFluticasone Propionate1123
Total, serious adverse eventsPrednisone2128

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Fluticasone Propionate vs Prednisone: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Fluticasone Propionate vs Prednisone: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01687296

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01687296/results?page=2