ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01687413

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Disease-free Survival (DFS)1 year
PrimaryLocoregional ControlUp to 2 yearsRate of patients with no recurrence at original oropharyngeal site or in the neck nodal basins.
SecondaryRate of Distant MetastasisUp to 2 yearsAssessed by biopsy or imaging-detected recurrent disease at sites away from the original primary and cervical zone.
SecondaryDisease Specific Survival1 year
SecondaryNumber of Complications/Acute Toxicity by Organ ClassApproximately 18 weeks-Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by the MD Anderson Dysphagia InventoryBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months
* Each item is scored on a 5 point Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, no opinion, agree, strongly agree). Strongly agree = 1, Disagree = 2, No opinion = 3, Agree = 4, and Strongly Agree = 5 * The lower the score the lower the quality of life
SecondaryChange in Cognitive Function as Measured by Cognitive Failures QuestionnaireBaseline, 1 month, 12 months, and 24 months
* 25 questions to assess the frequency in which participants experience cognitive failures including forgetfulness, distractibility, and false triggering * Answers range from 0 = never to 4 = very often * The higher the score the worse the cognitive failures the participant has experienced
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII)Baseline, 12 months, and 24 months
-The NDII consists of 10 questions; each with a 5 level ordinally scaled response option ranging from "not at all" to "a lot". The response for each item is then scored from 1 to 5, with 5 denoting higher quality of life (Not at all) and 1 being the least (A lot).
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by University of Michigan Xerostomia QuestionnaireBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months
* It contains 8 questions regarding dryness either during feeding or in the unstimulated state. Participants rate each item from 0 to 10, where 10 indicates the maximum dryness or discomfort due to dryness. * The higher the score the worse the participant's xerostomia
SecondaryChange in Hearing as Measured by Hearing Handicap Inventory - AdultBaseline, 1 month, and 12 months* 11 item questionnaire to identify issues with hearing * Answers are yes = 4, sometimes = 2, and no = 0 * The higher the score the more issues the participant has with hearing
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by Scale of Subjective Total Taste AcuityBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months
* 1 question that asks about taste acuity * Answers are 0 = same taste acuity as before treatment; 1 = mild loss of taste acuity, but not inconvenient in daily life; moderate loss of taste acuity, and sometimes inconvenient in daily life; severe loss of taste acuity, and frequently inconvenient in daily life; and 4 = almost complete or complete loss of taste acuity * The higher the score the worse the participant's taste acuity
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by Speech Handicap IndexBaseline and 12 months
* 31 questions regarding participant's speech and the effects of speech on his/her life * The answers for the first 30 questions range from 0 = never to 4 = always and the answers for the 31st question ranges from 0 = excellent to bad = 4 * The higher the score the worse the participant's speech is affecting his/her life
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months
* 30 questions designed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients * The first 28 questions have answers that range from 1=not at all to 4 = very much. The higher score indicates a worse quality of life * The last 2 questions have answers that range from 1 = very poor to 7 = excellent. The higher score indicates a better quality of life

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01687413/registered