ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01691560

Exploratory Study to Evaluate an Occlusion Based Dentifrice in Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity

NCT01691560, Phase 2, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2014-05-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Exploratory Study to Evaluate an Occlusion Based Dentifrice in Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity. Trials, record NCT01691560. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01691560

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Exploratory Study to Evaluate an Occlusion Based Dentifrice in Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity
NCT number
NCT01691560
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
140 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Dentine Hypersensitivity
Interventions
5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice, 0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice, Sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice, Sodium fluoride dentifrice
First posted
2012-09-24
Last updated
2014-05-29
Results first posted
2014-05-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 4Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatment
Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responds to air stimulus and request discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responds to air stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 4Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatment
Response to increasing force on hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Yeaple Probe pain response scale. In tactile sensitivity assessment, an increasing force is applied to hypersensitive tooth until a yes response was recorded or the maximum force was reached.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 8Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatment
Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responds to air stimulus and request discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responds to air stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 8Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatment
Response to increasing force on hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Yeaple Probe pain response scale. In tactile sensitivity assessment, an increasing force is applied to hypersensitive tooth until a yes response was recorded or the maximum force was reached.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Response on a Visual Rating Scale (VRS) at Week 4Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentParticipants rated the intensity of their response to the stimulus using a 10 point Visual rating scale of 1 (no Pain) to 10 (intense pain).
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Response on VRS at Week 8Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentParticipants rated the intensity of their response to the stimulus using a 10 point VRS of 1 (no Pain) to 10 (intense pain).

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 4Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentIntent to Treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants administered with at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 4Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentITT population: All randomized participants administered with at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.gramsMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 8Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentITT population: All randomized participants administered with at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 8Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentITT population: All randomized participants administered with at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.gramsMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Response on a Visual Rating Scale (VRS) at Week 4Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentITT population: All randomized participants administered with at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Response on VRS at Week 8Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentITT population: All randomized participants administered with at least one study treatment during the study and provided at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 45% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate-0.3695% Confidence Interval -0.53 to -0.20Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 4Sodium Monofluorophosphate-0.4395% Confidence Interval -0.59 to -0.27Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 4Sodium Fluoride-0.4095% Confidence Interval -0.57 to -0.23Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 40% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate-0.4595% Confidence Interval -0.62 to -0.28Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 45% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate7.31Standard Deviation 11.227grams
Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 4Sodium Monofluorophosphate6.32Standard Deviation 13.045grams
Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 4Sodium Fluoride4.09Standard Deviation 4.752grams
Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 40% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate3.64Standard Deviation 6.030grams
Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 85% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate-0.5595% Confidence Interval -0.78 to -0.33Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 8Sodium Monofluorophosphate-0.4395% Confidence Interval -0.66 to -0.20Score on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate34
Overall StudySTARTED0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate33
Overall StudySTARTEDSodium Monofluorophosphate34
Overall StudySTARTEDSodium Fluoride33
Overall StudyCOMPLETED5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate34
Overall StudyCOMPLETED0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSodium Monofluorophosphate34
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSodium Fluoride33
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate
Total, all-cause mortality0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Monofluorophosphate
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride
Total, other adverse events5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate034
Total, other adverse events0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate033
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Monofluorophosphate034
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Fluoride033
Total, serious adverse events5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate034
Total, serious adverse events0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate033

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01691560

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01691560/results?page=2