ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01706263

U0289-402: An Open Label, 8 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II in Subjects With Acne

NCT01706263, Phase 4, Completed, Stiefel, a GSK Company; results first posted 2018-01-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. U0289-402: An Open Label, 8 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II in Subjects With Acne. Trials, record NCT01706263. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01706263

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
U0289-402: An Open Label, 8 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II in Subjects With Acne
NCT number
NCT01706263
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
28 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stiefel, a GSK Company
Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Interventions
MAXCLARITY II (2.5% BPO) Foam Cleanser, MAXCLARITY II (2.5% BPO) Foam Treatment, MAXCLARITY II (0.5% Salicylic Acid) Toner Foam
First posted
2012-10-15
Last updated
2018-01-08
Results first posted
2018-01-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 8Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8
Evaluator assessed the left and right side of the face as inflammatory (papules \[solid elevation of skin with no visible fluid\] and pustules \[small inflamed elevation of the skin that is filled with pus\]) and non-inflammatory (open \[blackheads\] and closed \[whiteheads\] comedones) and total lesions (sum of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion) for each participant. Each type of lesion was counted separately; the lesion counts were taken from the face from hairline to the mandible (including forehead, cheeks, and chin). Total lesion counts were calculated as the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. Percent change from Baseline to Week 8 was calculated as the value at Week 8 minus the value at Baseline divided by the Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value .
SecondaryMean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4
Evaluator assessed the left side and right side of the face as inflammatory (papules \[solid elevation of skin with no visible fluid\] and pustules \[small inflamed elevation of the skin that is filled with pus\]) and non-inflammatory (open comedones \[blackheads\] and closed comedones \[whiteheads\]) and total lesions for each participant. Each type of lesion was counted separately; the lesion counts were taken from the face from hairline to the mandible (including forehead, cheeks, and chin). Total lesion counts was calculated as the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. Percent change from Baseline to specified time (Weeks 1, 2, and 4) point was calculated as the value at specified time point minus the value at Baseline divided by the Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value .
SecondaryMean Change in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8
Evaluator assessed the acne severity of participants' faces using the ISGA scale on a five point scale which ranged from 0 to 4 defined as 0-clear, 1-almost clear, 2-mild, 3-moderate, 4-severe. Change from Baseline to specified time point (Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8) was calculated as the value at specified time point minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value .
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Improved by at Least One Grade on the ISGAUp to Week 8
Evaluator assessed the acne severity of participants' faces using the ISGA scale on a five point scale which ranged from 0 to 4 defined as 0-clear, 1-almost clear, 2-mild, 3-moderate, 4-severe. Percent change from Baseline to specified time point was calculated as the value at specified time point minus the value at Baseline divided by the Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value .
SecondaryChange in Investigator Assessment of Tolerability (Erythema, Dryness and Peeling) From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8.Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8
Erythema , dryness, and peeling, were evaluated independently by the investigator on a five point scale ranged from 0 to 4 defined as 0-none, 1-very minimal, 2-mild, 3-moderate, 4-severe. Change from Baseline to specified time point (Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8) was calculated as the value at specified time point minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value .
SecondaryChange in Participant Assessment of Tolerability (Redness, Dryness, Burning, Itching and Scaling) From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8
Redness, dryness, burning, itching and scaling were evaluated independently by the participant on a five point scale ranged from 0 to 4 defined as 0-none, 1-very minimal, 2-mild, 3-moderate, 4-severe. Change from Baseline to specified time point (Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8) was calculated as the value at specified time point minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value .

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 8Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8Intent-to-treat analysis set was used which included data from all randomized participants who received study product.Percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4Intent-to-treat analysis set.Percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8Intent-to-treat analysis set.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Improved by at Least One Grade on the ISGAUp to Week 8Intent-to-treat analysis set.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Investigator Assessment of Tolerability (Erythema, Dryness and Peeling) From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8.Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8Intent-to-treat analysis set.Score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Participant Assessment of Tolerability (Redness, Dryness, Burning, Itching and Scaling) From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8Baseline (Day 1) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8Intent-to-treat analysis set.Score on scaleMEAN

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 8MAXCLARITY IIInflammatory lesion count-62.1Standard Deviation 37.1Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 8MAXCLARITY IINon-Inflammatory lesion count-49.8Standard Deviation 39.7Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 8MAXCLARITY IITotal lesion count-56.9Standard Deviation 32.7Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IIInflammatory lesion count, Week 1-27.9Standard Deviation 29.8Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IIInflammatory lesion count, Week 2-50.8Standard Deviation 25.6Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IIInflammatory lesion count, Week 4-49.5Standard Deviation 30.6Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IINon-Inflammatory lesion count, Week 1-9.9Standard Deviation 45.1Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IINon-Inflammatory lesion count, Week 2-23.4Standard Deviation 38.0Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IINon-Inflammatory lesion count, Week 4-34.3Standard Deviation 37.5Percent change
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory, Non Inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 4MAXCLARITY IITotal lesion count, Week 1-22.6Standard Deviation 27.6Percent change

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMAXCLARITY II28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMAXCLARITY II28
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMAXCLARITY II0

Adverse events11

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHiatus herniaGastrointestinal disordersMAXCLARITY II128
otherApplication Site BurningGeneral disordersMAXCLARITY II128
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsMAXCLARITY II228
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsMAXCLARITY II328
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsMAXCLARITY II528
otherPneumoniaInfections and infestationsMAXCLARITY II128
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsMAXCLARITY II128
otherSkin LacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsMAXCLARITY II128
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMAXCLARITY II128
otherOropharyngeal PainRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMAXCLARITY II128

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMAXCLARITY II028
Total, other adverse eventsMAXCLARITY II1128
Total, serious adverse eventsMAXCLARITY II028

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01706263

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01706263/results?page=2