ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01708915

Nonivamide/Nicoboxil Ointment in Acute Low Back Pain

NCT01708915, Phase 3, Completed, Boehringer Ingelheim; results first posted 2014-05-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Nonivamide/Nicoboxil Ointment in Acute Low Back Pain. Trials, record NCT01708915. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01708915

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Nonivamide/Nicoboxil Ointment in Acute Low Back Pain
NCT number
NCT01708915
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
805 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Conditions
Acute Low Back Pain
Interventions
nicoboxil, placebo matching nonivamide + nicoboxil, nonivamide + nicoboxil (Finalgon), nonivamide
First posted
2012-10-17
Last updated
2014-05-29
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-003890-27
Results first posted
2014-05-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 8hours After First ApplicationBaseline and 8 hours after first ointment application
Pain intensity (PI) was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible) at pre-dose baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours after first ointment application. Means were adjusted for centre effect and baseline value.
SecondaryPain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 4 Hours After First ApplicationBaseline and 4 hours after first ointment application
Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible) at pre-dose baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after first ointment application. Means were adjusted for centre effect and baseline value.
SecondaryDifference Between Baseline Pain Intensity and Average Pain Intensity on the Last Individual Treatment DayBaseline and 1 to 4 days
Average pain intensity was assessed in the evening of days 1, 2, 3 and 4 on a 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible). The last individual treatment day is the last day with diary-recorded ointment application. Means were adjusted for centre effect and baseline value.
SecondaryPatient Assessment of Efficacy on the Last Individual Treatment Day1 to 4 days
Patient assessment of efficacy was assessed on a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS, 0 = 'poor', 1 = 'fair', 2 = 'good', 3 = 'very good' relief of the patients' low back pain) in the evening of days 1, 2, 3 and 4. The last individual treatment day is the last day with diary-recorded ointment application

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 8hours After First ApplicationBaseline and 8 hours after first ointment application
Patients from the Full Analysis Set (FAS): all randomised patients who used at least 1 dose of study medication and provided any post-treatment data for the pain intensity difference within 8 hours after first application.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 4 Hours After First ApplicationBaseline and 4 hours after first ointment applicationPatients from FAS.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDifference Between Baseline Pain Intensity and Average Pain Intensity on the Last Individual Treatment DayBaseline and 1 to 4 daysPatients from FAS with evaluable data for the pain intensity at baseline and for the avarage pain intensity on the last individual treatment day.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient Assessment of Efficacy on the Last Individual Treatment Day1 to 4 daysPatients from FAS.participantsNUMBER

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 8hours After First ApplicationPlacebo-1.049Standard Error 0.106units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 8hours After First ApplicationNicoboxil-1.428Standard Error 0.109units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 8hours After First ApplicationNonivamide-2.252Standard Error 0.141units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 8hours After First ApplicationNicoboxil/Nonivamide-2.410Standard Error 0.138units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 4 Hours After First ApplicationPlacebo-0.650Standard Error 0.077units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 4 Hours After First ApplicationNicoboxil-0.968Standard Error 0.091units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 4 Hours After First ApplicationNonivamide-1.641Standard Error 0.110units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Between Pre-dose Baseline and 4 Hours After First ApplicationNicoboxil/Nonivamide-1.699Standard Error 0.109units on a scale
Difference Between Baseline Pain Intensity and Average Pain Intensity on the Last Individual Treatment DayPlacebo-1.884Standard Error 0.160units on a scale
Difference Between Baseline Pain Intensity and Average Pain Intensity on the Last Individual Treatment DayNicoboxil-2.371Standard Error 0.160units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo204
Overall StudySTARTEDNicoboxil201
Overall StudySTARTEDNonivamide198
Overall StudySTARTEDNicoboxil/Nonivamide202
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo118
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNicoboxil139
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNonivamide152
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNicoboxil/Nonivamide169
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo86
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNicoboxil62

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo0204
seriousBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersNicoboxil0201
seriousBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersNonivamide1198
seriousBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersNicoboxil/Nonivamide0202

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityNicoboxil
Total, all-cause mortalityNonivamide
Total, all-cause mortalityNicoboxil/Nonivamide
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo0204
Total, other adverse eventsNicoboxil0201
Total, other adverse eventsNonivamide0198
Total, other adverse eventsNicoboxil/Nonivamide0202
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0204
Total, serious adverse eventsNicoboxil0201

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25929250DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01708915

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01708915/results?page=2