ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01709110

VERtebral Fracture Treatment Comparisons in Osteoporotic Women

NCT01709110, Phase 4, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2018-01-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. VERtebral Fracture Treatment Comparisons in Osteoporotic Women. Trials, record NCT01709110. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01709110

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
VERtebral Fracture Treatment Comparisons in Osteoporotic Women
NCT number
NCT01709110
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
1,366 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Teriparatide, Risedronate, Placebo, Calcium, Vitamin D
First posted
2012-10-17
Last updated
2019-09-23
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-000123-41
Results first posted
2018-01-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
The incidence of new vertebral fractures was assessed by quantitative vertebral morphometry measurements (QM) with qualitative visual semiquantitative grading (SQ) confirmation. A new vertebral fracture was diagnosed in a vertebra that was non-fractured at the baseline radiological examination. It was defined as a loss of vertebral body height of at least 20% and 4 mm from the baseline radiograph by vertebral QM, based upon placement of six points by a trained, central reader. Any fractures identified by QM were confirmed using SQ: if the vertebral body also had an increase of one or more severity grade, it was considered an incident vertebral fracture.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
Worsening of a pre-existing fracture was considered if the decrease in vertebral height was at least one severity grade in the semi-quantitative assessment, confirmed by a trained central reader, where vertebrae were graded as normal (SQ0) or as with mild (SQ1), moderate (SQ2), or severe (SQ3) fractures, defined as \~20 to 25% (mild), \~25 to 40% (moderate) or \~40% or more (severe) decrease in anterior, central, or posterior vertebral height (T4 to L4).
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
A clinical vertebral fracture was defined as a new or worsening vertebral fracture, confirmed by radiography, that was associated with signs and symptoms highly suggestive of a vertebral fracture. All non-vertebral fractures that occurred and were diagnosed between visits required the confirmation by the site investigators after evaluating the original x-ray film(s), the radiology or surgical report. For clinical vertebral fractures, the final confirmation of the diagnosis required the centralized evaluation by a trained, independent reader.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
A non-vertebral fracture is a fracture at any of the following non-vertebral sites: clavicle, scapula, ribs, sternum, sacrum, coccyx, humerus, radius, ulna, carpus, pelvis, hip, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, ankle, calcaneus, tarsus, and metatarsal. Non-vertebral fractures were determined by direct questioning at each visit, and confirmed by the site investigators by x-ray, radiology or surgical report. Fractures resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving object were not considered fragility fractures but traumatic fractures.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
A major non-vertebral fracture is a fracture at any of the following non-vertebral sites hip, radius, humerus, ribs, pelvis, tibia and femur. Non-vertebral fractures were determined by direct questioning at each visit, and confirmed by the site investigators by x-ray, radiology or surgical report. Fractures resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With New Moderate and/or Severe Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
Vertebrae were graded as moderate (SQ2), or severe (SQ3) fractures, based on \~25 to 40% (moderate) or \~40% or more (severe) decrease in anterior, central, or posterior vertebral height (T4 through L4).
SecondaryProportion of Participants With New Multiple (2 or More) Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 Months
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Pooled Fragility and Traumatic Non-Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsTraumatic fractures were considered if resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving object.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in HeightBaseline, 24 Months
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Back Pain Using an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating ScaleBaseline, 24 Months
Participants rated the worst back pain during the 24 hours preceding the visit at baseline and each post-baseline visit. An 11-point numerical back pain rating scale (rated from 0 = no back pain to 10 = worst possible back pain) was used.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set-modified: participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline spinal radiograph evaluable to assess the vertebral fracture status after 24 month of therapy.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set-modified: participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline spinal radiograph evaluable to assess the vertebral fracture status after 24 month of therapy.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable data.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable data.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable data.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With New Moderate and/or Severe Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set-modified: participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline spinal radiograph evaluable to assess the vertebral fracture status after 24 month of therapy.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With New Multiple (2 or More) Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set-modified: participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline spinal radiograph evaluable to assess the vertebral fracture status after 24 month of therapy.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Pooled Fragility and Traumatic Non-Vertebral FracturesBaseline through 24 MonthsFull analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable data.Participants (with at least one event)NUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in HeightBaseline, 24 MonthsFull analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable data.Centimeter (cm)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Back Pain Using an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating ScaleBaseline, 24 MonthsFull analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable data.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesTeriparatide28Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesRisedronate64Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral FracturesTeriparatide31Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral FracturesRisedronate69Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesTeriparatide30Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesRisedronate61Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesTeriparatide25Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesRisedronate38Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesTeriparatide18Participants (with at least one event)
Proportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility FracturesRisedronate31Participants (with at least one event)

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTeriparatide683
Overall StudySTARTEDRisedronate683
Overall StudyReceived at Least One Dose of Study DrugTeriparatide680
Overall StudyReceived at Least One Dose of Study DrugRisedronate680
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTeriparatide498
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRisedronate515
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTeriparatide185
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRisedronate168

Adverse events452

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersTeriparatide4468354
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRisedronate5168363
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersTeriparatide7368377
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRisedronate7968389
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersTeriparatide3768345
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRisedronate06830
seriousCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersTeriparatide16831
seriousCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersRisedronate06830
seriousHaemolytic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTeriparatide06830
seriousHaemolytic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRisedronate16832

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTeriparatide
Total, all-cause mortalityRisedronate
Total, other adverse eventsTeriparatide130683
Total, other adverse eventsRisedronate130683
Total, serious adverse eventsTeriparatide138683
Total, serious adverse eventsRisedronate117683

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29129436DERIVEDPubMed
29329484DERIVEDPubMed
30659410DERIVEDPubMed
32157334DERIVEDPubMed
32474650DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Teriparatide vs Risedronate: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01709110

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01709110/results?page=2