ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01734395

A Study to Show That the Change of Attention Measure is Correlated With the Changes of Caregiver's Burden After Treatment With Galantamine in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

NCT01734395, Completed, Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea; results first posted 2013-08-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Show That the Change of Attention Measure is Correlated With the Changes of Caregiver's Burden After Treatment With Galantamine in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease. Trials, record NCT01734395. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01734395

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Show That the Change of Attention Measure is Correlated With the Changes of Caregiver's Burden After Treatment With Galantamine in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT number
NCT01734395
Status
Completed
Enrollment
1,882 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
Conditions
Alzheimer's Disease
Interventions
Galantamine
First posted
2012-11-27
Last updated
2013-08-05
Results first posted
2013-08-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline at Week 16 in Attention Questionnaire Scores (AQS)Baseline (Week 1 [Day 1]), Week 16
AQS evaluates the attention of participants with dementia and is designed for their caregivers to evaluate the participant's attention directly. It has 15 questions devised to be suitable for cultural characteristics of Korea through the standardization study considering education and gender/culture gap. Each question is scored from 0 to 2 (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=usually). In questions 1 to 8, the lower participant attention ability rated the higher score (AQS1), In questions 9 to 15, the higher participant attention ability rated the higher score (AQS2). The total score is calculated by the formula: 16-AQS1+AQS2 and the range is from 0 to 30. Higher score means better attention ability of participant.
PrimaryChange From Baseline at Week 16 in Burden Interview (BI) ScoresBaseline, Week 16
BI is designed to evaluate subjective stress dementia patients' caregivers experience in relation to caregiving. It has total 22 questions with 4 options each and the calculated scores are from 1 to 88 (0-20 = Little or no burden, 21-40 = Mild to moderate burden, 41-60 = Moderate to severe burden, 61-88 = Severe burden). Higher scores indicate worsening.
SecondaryChange From Screening at Week 16 in Mini Mental State Exam Scores (MMSE)Baseline, Week 16
MMSC is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used for the assessment of dementia patients' cognitive impairment. Evaluation of points are as: 24-30 = No cognitive impairment, 18-23 = Mild cognitive impairment, 0-17 = Severe cognitive impairment. Lower scores indicate worsening.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline at Week 16 in Attention Questionnaire Scores (AQS)Baseline (Week 1 [Day 1]), Week 16
FAS (Full Analysis Set) was used for the analysis. The FAS population was defined as the participants who satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and received the study drug at least once and whose evaluation visit was performed at least once in addition to the visit at baseline.
Units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline at Week 16 in Burden Interview (BI) ScoresBaseline, Week 16
FAS was used for the analysis. The FAS population was defined as the participants who satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and received the study drug at least once and whose evaluation visit was performed at least once in addition to the visit at baseline.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Screening at Week 16 in Mini Mental State Exam Scores (MMSE)Baseline, Week 16FAS was used for the analysis. The FAS population was defined as the participants who satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteriaUnits on a scaleMEAN

Results by group3

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Attention Questionnaire Scores (AQS)Galantamine-1.19Standard Deviation 4.56Units on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Burden Interview (BI) ScoresGalantamine1.48Standard Deviation 10.69Units on a scale
Change From Screening at Week 16 in Mini Mental State Exam Scores (MMSE)Galantamine-0.69Standard Deviation 2.43Units on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGalantamine1,882
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGalantamine1,472
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGalantamine410

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersGalantamine11,8821
seriousSepsisInfections and infestationsGalantamine11,8821
seriousSeptic shockInfections and infestationsGalantamine11,8821
seriousAstheniaGeneral disordersGalantamine21,8822
seriousDeathGeneral disordersGalantamine11,8821
seriousPneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersGalantamine11,8821
seriousCholecystitisHepatobiliary disordersGalantamine11,8821
seriousCerebrovascular accidentNervous system disordersGalantamine11,8821

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGalantamine
Total, other adverse eventsGalantamine01,882
Total, serious adverse eventsGalantamine71,882

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01734395

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01734395/registered