ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01737398

Efficacy and Safety of Inotersen in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

NCT01737398, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2019-01-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Inotersen in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy. Trials, record NCT01737398. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01737398

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Inotersen in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy
NCT number
NCT01737398
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
173 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
FAP, Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy, TTR, Transthyretin, Amyloidosis
Interventions
Inotersen, Placebo
First posted
2012-11-29
Last updated
2019-07-17
Results first posted
2019-01-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The mNIS+7 composite score is a measure of neurologic impairment that evaluates muscle weakness, sensation, reflexes, nerve conduction, and autonomic function. The mNIS+7 Composite Score has a range of -22.32 to 346.32 and a higher mNIS+7 composite score indicates lower function.
PrimaryChange From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The Norfolk QoL-DN score is a measure of physical function/large fiber neuropathy, symptoms, activities of daily living, small fiber neuropathy, and autonomic neuropathy. The Norfolk QoL-DN total score has a range of -4 to 136, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN score indicates poorer QoL.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The Norfolk QoL-DN symptoms score is a sub-score of the total Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire. The Norfolk QoL-DN symptoms domain score has a range of 0-32, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN score indicates poorer QoL.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The Norfolk QoL-DN physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy domain score is a sub-score of the total Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire. The Norfolk QoL-DN physical function/large fiber neuropathy domain score has a range of -4 to 56, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN domain score indicates poorer QoL.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65Baseline and Week 65The mBMI is the BMI multiplied by the serum albumin g/L
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 65Baseline and Week 65
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 66Baseline and Week 66The NIS score is a measure of neurologic impairment. The NIS Score has a range of 0 to 244 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified +7 at Week 66Baseline and Week 66The Modified +7 score is a version of the NIS score that is a measure of neurologic impairment. The Modified +7 Score has a range of -22.32 to 102.32 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in NIS+7 at Week 66Baseline and Week 66The NIS+7 score is a version of the NIS score that is a measure of neurologic impairment. The NIS+7 Score has a range of -26.04 to 270.04 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram (ECHO) at Week 65 in the CM-ECHO SetBaseline and Week 65GLS by ECHO is a measure of cardiac systolic function

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66Baseline and Week 66This endpoint only measured participants with Stage 1 hATTR-PN in Full Analysis Set. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66Baseline and Week 66This endpoints only measured participants who had Stage 2 hATTR-PN in Full Analysis Set. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65Baseline and Week 65
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
kg/m^2*g/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 65Baseline and Week 65
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
kg/m^2MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Modified +7 at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in NIS+7 at Week 66Baseline and Week 66
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of study drug (inotersen or placebo) and who had a Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment for the mNIS+7 score or Norfolk QoL-DN questionnaire total score. Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram (ECHO) at Week 65 in the CM-ECHO SetBaseline and Week 65
The CM-ECHO Set includes the subset of the Randomized Set who had a diagnosis of TTR cardiomyopathy at study entry but are not in the ECHO subgroup, plus participants who qualified to participate in the ECHO subgroup (whether consented or not). Participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data.
Percent ChangeMEAN

Results by group38

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66Inotersen4.16Standard Deviation 15.672Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66Placebo23.89Standard Deviation 24.190Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66Inotersen-0.08Standard Deviation 18.967Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66Placebo10.77Standard Deviation 21.134Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66Inotersen-1.40Standard Deviation 4.763Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66Placebo1.18Standard Deviation 5.270Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66Inotersen1.05Standard Deviation 11.924Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66Placebo8.74Standard Deviation 9.689Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65Inotersen-73.32Standard Deviation 96.311kg/m^2*g/L
Change From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65Placebo-85.21Standard Deviation 91.259kg/m^2*g/L

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDInotersen113
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo60
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugInotersen112
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo60
Overall StudySafety SetInotersen112
Overall StudySafety SetPlacebo60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInotersen87
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo52
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInotersen26
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo8

Adverse events260

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotersen15112
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo260
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotersen14112
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo160
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersInotersen6112
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersPlacebo160
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersInotersen2112
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersPlacebo360
otherBlepharitisEye disordersInotersen2112
otherBlepharitisEye disordersPlacebo460

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInotersen5112
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo060
Total, other adverse eventsInotersen110112
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo6060
Total, serious adverse eventsInotersen36112
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1360

Papers14

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29972757RESULTPubMed
30169969DERIVEDPubMed
30219500DERIVEDPubMed
31853709DERIVEDPubMed
32654156DERIVEDPubMed
32654212DERIVEDPubMed
32833564DERIVEDPubMed
34125267DERIVEDPubMed
34355354DERIVEDPubMed
35766224DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 14

See all 14 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Inotersen vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Inotersen vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01737398

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01737398/results?page=2