ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01743729

A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lifitegrast in Subjects With Dry Eye

NCT01743729, Phase 3, Completed, Shire; results first posted 2017-02-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lifitegrast in Subjects With Dry Eye. Trials, record NCT01743729. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01743729

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lifitegrast in Subjects With Dry Eye
NCT number
NCT01743729
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
720 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Dry Eye Disease
Interventions
Lifitegrast, Placebo
First posted
2012-12-06
Last updated
2021-06-23
Results first posted
2017-02-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score to Day 84Baseline to Day 84
Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=few/rare punctate lesions; 2=discrete and countable lesions; 3=lesions too numerous to count, but not coalescent; 4=coalescent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower scores indicate improvement. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (Visual Analogue Scale) to Day 84Baseline to Day 84
Eye dryness score was assessed on a visual analogue scale (a 7-item \[burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation, eye discomfort, eye dryness, photophobia, and pain\], participant-reported, symptom index) with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort) and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score to Day 84Baseline to Day 84Intent-to-treat (ITT) set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (Visual Analogue Scale) to Day 84Baseline to Day 84ITT population with last observation carried forward (LOCF).units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score to Day 84LifitegrastBaseline2.39Standard Deviation 0.763units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score to Day 84PlaceboBaseline2.40Standard Deviation 0.722units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score to Day 84LifitegrastChange from Baseline to Day 84-0.73Standard Deviation 0.926units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score to Day 84PlaceboChange from Baseline to Day 84-0.71Standard Deviation 0.943units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (Visual Analogue Scale) to Day 84LifitegrastBaseline69.68Standard Deviation 16.954units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (Visual Analogue Scale) to Day 84PlaceboBaseline69.22Standard Deviation 16.761units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (Visual Analogue Scale) to Day 84LifitegrastChange from Baseline to Day 84-35.30Standard Deviation 28.400units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (Visual Analogue Scale) to Day 84PlaceboChange from Baseline to Day 84-22.75Standard Deviation 28.600units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLifitegrast358
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo360
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLifitegrast321
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo348
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLifitegrast37
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo12

Adverse events22

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVisual acuity reducedEye disordersLifitegrast1835923
otherVisual acuity reducedEye disordersPlacebo2335928
otherInstillation site irritationGeneral disordersLifitegrast2835929
otherInstillation site irritationGeneral disordersPlacebo53595
otherInstillation site reactionGeneral disordersLifitegrast2535929
otherInstillation site reactionGeneral disordersPlacebo43594
otherDysgeusiaNervous system disordersLifitegrast5835958
otherDysgeusiaNervous system disordersPlacebo13591
seriousVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersLifitegrast13591
seriousVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo03590

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLifitegrast
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsLifitegrast102359
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo30359
Total, serious adverse eventsLifitegrast3359
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo4359

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
26365210RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Lifitegrast vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01743729

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01743729/events?page=2