ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01750879

Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy

NCT01750879, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Massachusetts General Hospital; results first posted 2021-07-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy. Trials, record NCT01750879. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01750879

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT number
NCT01750879
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
41 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Conditions
Peanut Allergy
Interventions
Peanut Flour, Oat Flour
First posted
2012-12-17
Last updated
2021-07-28
Results first posted
2021-07-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailureAverage 515 days from DBPCFC1 to DBPCFC3
1. Tolerance: Ingestion of 4430 mg of peanut protein at DBPCFC3 without symptoms. 2. Partial Tolerance: ED at DBPCFC3 \<4430 mg but =\>430 mg AND \>10-fold more than at DBPCFC1. 3. Treatment Failure - non desensitized: Failure to achieve the minimum maintenance dose (600 mg) of peanut protein by 12 months, or an ED \<1443 mg at DBPCFC2, or ED at DBPCFC3 \<443 mg OR \<10-fold more than at DBPCFC1. 4. Treatment Failure - withdrawal
SecondaryClinical: Tolerance630 daysThe change in median eliciting dose (ED) from DBPCFC1 to DBPCFC3. (note: ED right censored to maximum dose for those without any clinical reactivity)
SecondaryClinical: Desensitization518 days\- The change in median eliciting dose (ED) from DBPCFC1 to DBPCFC2.
SecondaryClinical: Safety630 days\- The rate of reported adverse advents due to accidental ingestions in the active versus placebo groups.
SecondaryMechanistic: TCR Clonal Diversity630 days
The change in the TCR clonal diversity of in vitro allergen-expanded Treg cells and induced Treg cells measured by TCRB CDR3 sequence clonotyping of sorted cells during active treatment among participants who achieve increased clinical tolerance (Tolerance and Partial Tolerance Groups as defined in clinical endpoints) versus the Treatment Failure Group. We conducted a nested case-control analysis of a subset of actively treated (by treatment outcome) versus placebo treated patients. Genomic DNA was used to amplify and sequence the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) regions (immunoSEQ assay; Adaptive Biotechnologies). Enriched clonotypes in the CD154+ fraction (doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088286) were analyzed for differences by Rank Abundance Curve analysis (R package alakazam; Chao A, et al. Ecology. 2015 96, 11891201) to determine differences in clonal diversity.
SecondaryMechanistic: Change Eliciting Dose of End-point Dilution.518 days
The change in eliciting dose of end-point dilution skin testing between actively treated and placebo treated participants following maintenance therapy and the change in ED of end-point dilution skin testing among actively treated participants following maintenance therapy and avoidance between clinical outcome groups.
SecondaryMechanistic: Change in Basophil Eliciting Dose.630 daysThe change in peanut-specific basophil ED in actively treated participants at the end of maintenance and the end of avoidance between clinical outcome groups.
SecondaryMechanistic: Change in Peanut Allergen-specific IgG4518 daysThe change in peanut allergen-specific IgG4 in actively treated participants by the end of maintenance between clinical outcome groups.
SecondaryMechanistic: Significant Gene Expression Changes by Transcriptional Profiling of Regulatory and Effector T Cell Populations630 days
Statistically significant gene expression changes (as number of genes) by transcriptional profiling of regulatory and effector T cell populations before and after OIT between clinical outcome groups. Total RNA from CD154+ and CD154-CD69- T cells was used for cDNA synthesis and amplification. Libraries were prepared and sequenced to a read depth of approximately 30 million reads per sample (Illumina HiSeq) and aligned to the hg19 human reference genome with the ensemble version 75 annotation using STAR version 2.5.3a,(Dobin et al. Bioinformatics 2013) and gene expression was summarized using RSEM version 1.3.0 (Li et al. BMC Bioinform 2013). Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 v 1.30.1 (R v 4.04). Significance level was set at an unadjusted P value less than .001.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailureAverage 515 days from DBPCFC1 to DBPCFC3ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYClinical: Tolerance630 daysPer protocol, subjects were unblinded after DBPCFC2 and those on placebo were not subjected to DBPCFC3mgMEDIAN
SECONDARYClinical: Desensitization518 days
30 active and 11 placebo had baseline challenge (DBPCFC1); 20 active and 8 placebo had first post-treatment challenge (DBPCFC2). Change in median eliciting dose restricted to the 20 and 8 who competed DBPCFC2 (i.e., per protocol)
mgMEDIAN
SECONDARYClinical: Safety630 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMechanistic: TCR Clonal Diversity630 days
We conducted a nested case-control analysis of a subset of actively treated (by treatment outcome) versus placebo treated patients. Genomic DNA was used to amplify and sequence the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) regions (immunoSEQ assay; Adaptive Biotechnologies). Enriched clonotypes in the CD154+ fraction (doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088286) were analyzed for differences by Rank Abundance Curve analysis (R package alakazam; Chao A, et al. Ecology. 2015 96, 11891201).
percentage of clonesMEAN
SECONDARYMechanistic: Change Eliciting Dose of End-point Dilution.518 daysskin test quality was poor
SECONDARYMechanistic: Change in Basophil Eliciting Dose.630 daysbasophil time points inadequate for analysis
SECONDARYMechanistic: Change in Peanut Allergen-specific IgG4518 daysmg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYMechanistic: Significant Gene Expression Changes by Transcriptional Profiling of Regulatory and Effector T Cell Populations630 days
Subjects as defined per protocol. All 5 placebo were 'treatment failure -- non-desensitized' and per protocol, none were eligible for avoidance or DBPCFC3.~Total RNA from CD154+ and CD154-CD69- T cells was used for cDNA synthesis and amplification. Read depth of approximately 30 million per sample (Illumina HiSeq) and aligned to the hg19 human reference genome with the ensemble version 75 annotation. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 v 1.30.1 (R v 4.04).
number of differentially expressed genesNUMBER

Results by group35

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailureActiveTolerance5Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailurePlaceboTolerance0Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailureActivePartial Tolerance8Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailurePlaceboPartial Tolerance0Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailureActiveTreatment Failure- non-desensitized7Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailurePlaceboTreatment Failure- non-desensitized8Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailureActiveTreatment Failure- withdrawal10Participants
Tolerance, Partial Tolerance, or Treatment FailurePlaceboTreatment Failure- withdrawal3Participants
Clinical: TolerancePeanut Flour4000Full Range -403 to 4400mg
Clinical: DesensitizationPeanut Flour4000Full Range -3 to 4400mg

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPeanut Flour30
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo (Oat) Flour11
Overall StudyDBPCFC2Peanut Flour20
Overall StudyDBPCFC2Placebo (Oat) Flour8
Overall StudyDBPCFC3Peanut Flour20
Overall StudyDBPCFC3Placebo (Oat) Flour0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPeanut Flour20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo (Oat) Flour8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPeanut Flour10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo (Oat) Flour3

Adverse events34

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaphylactic ReactionImmune system disordersPeanut Flour53012
otherAnaphylactic ReactionImmune system disordersOat Flour1111
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersPeanut Flour1301
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersOat Flour0110
otherNausea/VomtingGastrointestinal disordersPeanut Flour1301
otherNausea/VomtingGastrointestinal disordersOat Flour0110
otherUrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPeanut Flour1302
otherUrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersOat Flour0110
otherAnaphylactic ReactionImmune system disordersPeanut Flour153089
otherAnaphylactic ReactionImmune system disordersOat Flour0110

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPeanut Flour030
Total, all-cause mortalityOat Flour011
Total, other adverse eventsPeanut Flour3030
Total, other adverse eventsOat Flour1111
Total, serious adverse eventsPeanut Flour130
Total, serious adverse eventsOat Flour011

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
34813505DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U19AI095261T cell effector and regulatory mechanisms in asthma and food allergyLUSTER, ANDREW DMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES2011 to 2015

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Peanut Flour vs Placebo (Oat) Flour: Clinical: SafetyTrial comparisons
Peanut Flour vs Oat Flour: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Peanut Flour vs Oat Flour: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01750879

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01750879/results?page=2