ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01751126

Double-Masked Trial of NOVA22007 (1mg/mL Ciclosporin/Cyclosporine) Versus Vehicle in Pediatric Patients With Active Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

NCT01751126, Phase 3, Completed, Santen SAS; results first posted 2022-03-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Double-Masked Trial of NOVA22007 (1mg/mL Ciclosporin/Cyclosporine) Versus Vehicle in Pediatric Patients With Active Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis. Trials, record NCT01751126. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01751126

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Double-Masked Trial of NOVA22007 (1mg/mL Ciclosporin/Cyclosporine) Versus Vehicle in Pediatric Patients With Active Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis
NCT number
NCT01751126
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
169 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Santen SAS
Conditions
Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis
Interventions
NOVA22007 ''Ciclosporin'', Placebo
First posted
2012-12-17
Last updated
2022-03-28
Results first posted
2022-03-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAverage Penalties Adjusted Composite Efficacy Score (CFS) Score Over the 4 Monthsover the 4 months
Efficacy was assessed every month during the 4-month treatment phase and compared with Baseline using a composite criterion based on: * Keratitis assessed by the modified Oxford scale (7-point ordinal scale, score 0, 0.5, and 1 to 5). On this modified scale, the score 0 corresponded to no staining dots and the score 0.5 to three or less staining dots. A CFS grade of 0 represented complete corneal clearing. * Need for rescue medication. * Occurrence of corneal ulceration. An efficacy score was calculated as follows: Patient's score at month X = CFS (Baseline) - CFS (Month X) + penalty (ies) Penalty for rescue medication: -1 (per course, with a maximum of 2 courses between 2 scheduled visits) Penalty for corneal ulceration: -1 (per occurrence). A positive value indicated improvement. The maximum CFS is five and the minimum cannot be set due to the number of rescue medication and ulceration which decreases the penalty adjusted CFS.
SecondaryBest Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period IUp to Month4
Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) was measured with the patient's best correction and recorded in LogMAR (log of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) A negative LogMar BCDVA measure shows an improvement, whereas positive values indicates poor vision.
SecondaryBest Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 8-month Safety FU Period- Period IIUp to Month12
Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) was measured with the patient's best correction and recorded in LogMAR (log of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) A negative LogMar BCDVA measure shows an improvement, whereas positive values indicate poor vision.
SecondaryNumber of Courses of Rescue Medication in Period IUp to Month4Use of rescue medication: the total number of topical corticosteroid courses was assessed at each visit during the 4-month efficacy evaluation treatment period.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAverage Penalties Adjusted Composite Efficacy Score (CFS) Score Over the 4 Monthsover the 4 monthsPenalties Adjusted CFS ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYBest Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period IUp to Month4SS populationlettersMEAN
SECONDARYBest Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 8-month Safety FU Period- Period IIUp to Month12SS populationlettersMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Courses of Rescue Medication in Period IUp to Month4Participants reduced due to missing dataParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group120

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Average Penalties Adjusted Composite Efficacy Score (CFS) Score Over the 4 MonthsHigh Dose Regimen2.06Standard Deviation 1.44Penalties Adjusted CFS Score
Average Penalties Adjusted Composite Efficacy Score (CFS) Score Over the 4 MonthsLow Dose Regimen1.93Standard Deviation 1.37Penalties Adjusted CFS Score
Average Penalties Adjusted Composite Efficacy Score (CFS) Score Over the 4 MonthsPlacebo1.34Standard Deviation 1.22Penalties Adjusted CFS Score
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period ILogMAR - High Dose RegimenAnalysis Eye-Baseline0.293Standard Deviation 0.297letters
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period ILogMAR - Low Dose RegimenAnalysis Eye-Baseline0.209Standard Deviation 0.284letters
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period ILogMAR-PlaceboAnalysis Eye-Baseline0.302Standard Deviation 0.347letters
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period IChange From Baseline in LogMAR- High DoseAnalysis Eye-Baseline0Standard Deviation 0letters
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period IChange From Baseline in LogMAR- Low DoseAnalysis Eye-Baseline0Standard Deviation 0letters
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period IChange From Baseline in LogMAR- PlaceboAnalysis Eye-Baseline0Standard Deviation 0letters
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) in 4-month Randomized Period ILogMAR - High Dose RegimenAnalysis Eye-Month 10.263Standard Deviation 0.292letters

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period ISTARTEDHigh Dose Regimen57
Period ISTARTEDLow Dose Regimen54
Period ISTARTEDPlacebo58
Period ICOMPLETEDHigh Dose Regimen51
Period ICOMPLETEDLow Dose Regimen43
Period ICOMPLETEDPlacebo49
Period INOT COMPLETEDHigh Dose Regimen6
Period INOT COMPLETEDLow Dose Regimen11
Period INOT COMPLETEDPlacebo9
Period IISTARTEDHigh Dose Regimen72

Adverse events546

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disorders.1% QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)250
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersVehicle QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)222
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersTotal High Dose472
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disorders.1% BID + Vehicle BID (4 Months) Plus .1% BID+ Vehicle BID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)044
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersVehicle QID (4 Months) Plus .1% BID+ Vehicle BID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)126
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersTotal Low Dose170
otherEye pruritusEye disorders.1% QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)050
otherEye pruritusEye disordersVehicle QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)322
otherEye pruritusEye disordersTotal High Dose372
otherEye pruritusEye disorders.1% BID + Vehicle BID (4 Months) Plus .1% BID+ Vehicle BID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)044

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality.1% QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)
Total, all-cause mortalityTotal High Dose
Total, all-cause mortality.1% BID + Vehicle BID (4 Months) Plus .1% BID+ Vehicle BID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle QID (4 Months) Plus .1% BID+ Vehicle BID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)
Total, all-cause mortalityTotal Low Dose
Total, other adverse events.1% QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)2950
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle QID (4 Months) Plus .1% QID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)1322
Total, other adverse eventsTotal High Dose4272
Total, other adverse events.1% BID + Vehicle BID (4 Months) Plus .1% BID+ Vehicle BID (8 Months Safety Follow-up)2444

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01751126

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01751126/results?page=2