ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01770912

Efficacy of Steroid Supplementation After TMJ Rinsing for Pain Management

NCT01770912, Phase 2, Completed, University of Florida; results first posted 2020-10-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Steroid Supplementation After TMJ Rinsing for Pain Management. Trials, record NCT01770912. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01770912

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Steroid Supplementation After TMJ Rinsing for Pain Management
NCT number
NCT01770912
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
24 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Conditions
Pain
Interventions
Lactated Ringers, Triamcinolone hexacetonide
First posted
2013-01-18
Last updated
2020-10-08
Results first posted
2020-10-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks post-treatmentTMJ loading pain is evaluated using ordinal scale ratings of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe pain intensity).
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatmentTMJ loading pain is evaluated using ordinal scale ratings of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe pain intensity).
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 6 WeeksBaseline and 6 weeks post-treatmentTMJ loading pain is evaluated using ordinal scale ratings of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe pain intensity).
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion Without Pain at 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Mandibular range of motion is measured in millimeters (mm) of vertical opening between the upper and lower central incisors plus vertical overlap of the incisors. These measures are made for jaw unassisted opening without pain, maximum unassisted opening and maximum assisted opening. Horizontal mandibular range of motion is measured in millimeters (mm) assessed for maximal right and left mandibular lateral movements and mandibular protrusion. A positive value represents an improvement (or larger range of motion) in mandibular opening/lateral movement.
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion at 6 WeeksBaseline and 6 weeks post-treatment
Mandibular range of motion is measured in millimeters (mm) of vertical opening between the upper and lower central incisors plus vertical overlap of the incisors. These measures are made for jaw unassisted opening without pain, maximum unassisted opening and maximum assisted opening. Horizontal mandibular range of motion is measured in millimeters (mm) assessed for maximal right and left mandibular lateral movements and mandibular protrusion. A positive value represents an improvement (or larger range of motion) in mandibular opening/lateral movement.
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Pain-Free Motion at 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks post-treatment
Mandibular range of motion is measured in millimeters (mm) of vertical opening between the upper and lower central incisors plus vertical overlap of the incisors. These measures are made for jaw unassisted opening without pain, maximum unassisted opening and maximum assisted opening. Horizontal mandibular range of motion is measured in millimeters (mm) assessed for maximal right and left mandibular lateral movements and mandibular protrusion. A positive value represents an improvement (or larger range of motion) in mandibular opening/lateral movement.
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment Palpable Muscle Tenderness at 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatment
Palpable muscle tenderness of masticatory muscles using ordinal ratings of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe pain to palpation) are summed. A standardized muscle palpation pressure is used at specific locations on each side of the face for a total of 20 locations. The range of possible scores is 0-60. The rating of each muscle palpation site is added for a composite muscle tenderness score.
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment Palpable Muscle Tenderness at 6 WeeksBaseline and 6 weeks post-treatment
Palpable muscle tenderness of masticatory muscles using ordinal ratings of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe pain to palpation) are summed. A standardized muscle palpation pressure is used at specific locations on each side of the face for a total of 20 locations. The range of possible scores is 0-60. The rating of each muscle palpation site is added for a composite muscle tenderness score.
SecondaryChange From Pre-Treatment Palpable Muscle Tenderness at 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks post-treatment
Palpable muscle tenderness of masticatory muscles using ordinal ratings of 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, severe pain to palpation) are summed. A standardized muscle palpation pressure is used at specific locations on each side of the face for a total of 20 locations. The range of possible scores is 0-60. The rating of each muscle palpation site is added for a composite muscle tenderness score.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Pre-Treatment Joint Sounds in 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatmentOpening and closing sounds (click, course crepitus, fine crepitus) detected by palpation on left, right or both sides of face.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks post-treatmentunits on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatmentunits on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 6 WeeksBaseline and 6 weeks post-treatmentunits on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion Without Pain at 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatmentmmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion at 6 WeeksBaseline and 6 weeks post-treatmentmmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Pain-Free Motion at 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks post-treatmentmmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment Palpable Muscle Tenderness at 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatmentunits on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment Palpable Muscle Tenderness at 6 WeeksBaseline and 6 weeks post-treatmentunits on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-Treatment Palpable Muscle Tenderness at 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks post-treatmentunits on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Change From Pre-Treatment Joint Sounds in 2 WeeksBaseline and 2 weeks post-treatmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 12 WeeksLactated Ringers-1Full Range -2 to 0units on a scale
Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 12 WeeksTriamcinolone Acetonide-2Full Range -3 to 0units on a scale
Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 2 WeeksLactated Ringers-1Full Range -3 to 0units on a scale
Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 2 WeeksTriamcinolone Acetonide-2Full Range -3 to 0units on a scale
Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 6 WeeksLactated Ringers-1Full Range -2 to 2units on a scale
Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 6 WeeksTriamcinolone Acetonide-2Full Range -3 to -1units on a scale
Change From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion Without Pain at 2 WeeksLactated Ringers3.9Standard Error 2.4mm
Change From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion Without Pain at 2 WeeksTriamcinolone Acetonide9.7Standard Error 2.6mm
Change From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion at 6 WeeksLactated Ringers6.9Standard Error 2.8mm
Change From Pre-Treatment in Mandibular Range of Motion at 6 WeeksTriamcinolone Acetonide7.4Standard Error 2.9mm

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLactated Ringers12
Overall StudySTARTEDTriamcinolone Acetonide12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLactated Ringers10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTriamcinolone Acetonide12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLactated Ringers2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTriamcinolone Acetonide0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLactated Ringers012
Total, all-cause mortalityTriamcinolone Acetonide012
Total, other adverse eventsLactated Ringers012
Total, other adverse eventsTriamcinolone Acetonide012
Total, serious adverse eventsLactated Ringers012
Total, serious adverse eventsTriamcinolone Acetonide012

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
1298767BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lactated Ringers vs Triamcinolone Acetonide: Number of Participants With Change From Pre-Treatment Joint Sounds in 12 WeeksTrial comparisons
Lactated Ringers vs Triamcinolone Acetonide: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Lactated Ringers vs Triamcinolone Acetonide: Number of Participants With Change From Pre-Treatment Joint Sounds in 2 WeeksTrial comparisons
Lactated Ringers vs Triamcinolone Acetonide: Number of Participants With Change From Pre-Treatment Joint Sounds in 6 WeeksTrial comparisons
Lactated Ringers vs Triamcinolone Acetonide: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01770912

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01770912/results?page=2