ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01785472

Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Comparison to Olmesartan in Asian Patients With Essential Hypertension

NCT01785472, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2015-09-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Comparison to Olmesartan in Asian Patients With Essential Hypertension. Trials, record NCT01785472. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01785472

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Comparison to Olmesartan in Asian Patients With Essential Hypertension
NCT number
NCT01785472
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,438 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Essential Hypertension
Interventions
LCZ696, Olmesartan, Placebo of LCZ696, Placebo of Olmesartan
First posted
2013-02-07
Last updated
2016-12-29
Results first posted
2015-09-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 200 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgbaseline, 8 weeksSitting BP measurements will be performed at screening through end of study at every visit. Four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained with a full two minute interval between measurements.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgbaseline, 8 weeksSitting BP measurements will be performed at screening through end of study at every visit. Four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained with a full two minute interval between measurements
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgbaseline, 8 weeksSitting BP measurements were performed at screening through the end of the study at every study visit. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)baseline, 8 weeksFour separate sitting BP measurements should be obtained with a full two minute interval between measurements.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressurebaseline, 8 weeks
In this analysis, mean 24 hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure maSBP, mean 24 hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure maDBP, daytime and nightime maSBP and maDBP will be reported. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring over a 24 hour period will be conducted at two time points during the study.
SecondarySub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.baseline, 8 weeks
Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
SecondarySub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.baseline, 8 weeks
Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
SecondarySub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.baseline, 8 weeks
Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
SecondarySub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.baseline, 8 weeks
Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Blood Pressure Control8 weeksSuccessful blood pressure control is defined as msSBP \<140 mmHg and msDBP \<90 mmHg.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 200 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgbaseline, 8 weeks
Only participants, who had both baseline and week 8 values, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received study medication and had post baseline BP assessments
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgbaseline, 8 weeks
Only participants, who had both baseline and week 8 values, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received study medication and had post baseline BP assessments
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgbaseline, 8 weeks
Participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had both baseline and week 8 values, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all participants who received study medication and had post baseline BP assessments
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)baseline, 8 weeks
Participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had both baseline and endpoint were included in the analysis. The FAS included all participants who received study medication and had post baseline BP assessments
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressurebaseline, 8 weeksA subset of participants, who participated in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, was analyzedmmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYSub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.baseline, 8 weeksA subset of participants, who participated in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, was analyzedmmHgMEAN
SECONDARYSub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.baseline, 8 weeksA subset of participants, who participated in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, was analyzedmmHgMEAN
SECONDARYSub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.baseline, 8 weeksA subset of participants, who participated in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, was analyzedmmHgMEAN
SECONDARYSub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.baseline, 8 weeksA subset of participants, who participated in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, was analyzedmmHgMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Blood Pressure Control8 weeks
Participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had both baseline and endpoint, were included in the analysis. The FAS included all participants who received study medication and had post baseline BP assessments.
Number of participantsNUMBER

Results by group322

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 200 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgLCZ696 200 mg-20.48Standard Error 0.61mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 200 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgOlmesartan 20 mg-18.15Standard Error 0.61mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgLCZ696 400 mg-21.67Standard Error 0.62mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgOlmesartan 20 mg-18.15Standard Error 0.61mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgLCZ696 200 mg-8.10Standard Error 0.37mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgLCZ696 400 mg-8.80Standard Error 0.38mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mgOlmesartan 20 mg-6.86Standard Error 0.37mmHg
Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)LCZ696 200 mg-12.35Standard Error 0.42mmHg
Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)LCZ696 400 mg-12.93Standard Error 0.43mmHg
Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)Olmesartan 20 mg-11.25Standard Error 0.42mmHg

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLCZ696 200 mg479
Overall StudySTARTEDLCZ696 400 mg473
Overall StudySTARTEDOlmesartan 20 mg486
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)LCZ696 200 mg479
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)LCZ696 400 mg472
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Olmesartan 20 mg484
Overall StudySafety Set (SAF)LCZ696 200 mg478
Overall StudySafety Set (SAF)LCZ696 400 mg472
Overall StudySafety Set (SAF)Olmesartan 20 mg484
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLCZ696 200 mg455

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestationsLCZ696 200 mg15478
otherUPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestationsLCZ696 400 mg5472
otherUPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestationsOlmesartan 20 mg8484
otherBLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASEDInvestigationsLCZ696 200 mg5478
otherBLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASEDInvestigationsLCZ696 400 mg10472
otherBLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASEDInvestigationsOlmesartan 20 mg13484
otherHYPERLIPIDAEMIAMetabolism and nutrition disordersLCZ696 200 mg16478
otherHYPERLIPIDAEMIAMetabolism and nutrition disordersLCZ696 400 mg22472
otherHYPERLIPIDAEMIAMetabolism and nutrition disordersOlmesartan 20 mg21484
otherHYPERURICAEMIAMetabolism and nutrition disordersLCZ696 200 mg14478

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLCZ696 200 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityLCZ696 400 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityOlmesartan 20 mg
Total, other adverse eventsLCZ696 200 mg66478
Total, other adverse eventsLCZ696 400 mg63472
Total, other adverse eventsOlmesartan 20 mg66484
Total, serious adverse eventsLCZ696 200 mg5478
Total, serious adverse eventsLCZ696 400 mg3472
Total, serious adverse eventsOlmesartan 20 mg6484

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01785472

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01785472/results?page=2