ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01796197

Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab as Pre-Op for Inflammatory BrCa

NCT01796197, Phase 2, Completed, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; results first posted 2021-09-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab as Pre-Op for Inflammatory BrCa. Trials, record NCT01796197. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01796197

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab as Pre-Op for Inflammatory BrCa
NCT number
NCT01796197
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
23 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Mastectomy, Radiation Therapy
First posted
2013-02-21
Last updated
2026-02-05
Results first posted
2021-09-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentages of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response18 weeks
Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as absence of invasive carcinoma within the breast and axillary lymph nodes following preoperative treatment. Participants whose disease is not surgically resectable following preoperative treatment are considered as not having pCR.
PrimaryResidual Cancer Burden Rate18 Weeks
Residual cancer burden is calculated an then categorized based on the methods described in the following: Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(28): 4414-22. This method uses tumor size, the proportion of that tumor that is invasive carcinoma, the number of axillary lymph nodes containing metastatic carcinoma and the diameter of the largest metastasis in an axillary lymph node. These parameters are combined in a formula that outputs a RCB index. This index is divided into 4 categories: RCB-0, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III. The previous categories are in order of increasing severity of RCB.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Congestive Heart Failure1 year and 8 monthsNumber of participants with clinically significant congestive heart failure (CHF) as determined by established medical practices.
SecondaryMedian Disease Free Survival63 months
Disease-free survival (DFS) is defined for the participants who undergo surgery, as the duration of time from surgery until ipsilateral local-regional, contralateral or distant invasive recurrence or death from any cause; in the absence of an event, DFS will be censored at the date last know alive and free from recurrence.
SecondaryMedian Time to Treatment Failure63 months
Time to treatment failure (TTF) will be defined among all participants, as the duration of time from treatment initiation to a DFS event or progressive disease during preoperative therapy or treatment disease that is not surgically resectable; in the absence of an event, TTF will be censored at the date last know alive and free from recurrence or progression.
SecondaryMedian Overall Survival63 months
Overall survival (OS) will be defined among all participants, as the duration of time from treatment initiation to death from any cause, or is censored at date last known alive. Post-surgery OS will be defined among the participants who undergo surgery, as the duration of time from treatment initiation to death from any cause, or is censored at date last known alive.
SecondaryPathological Complete Response Rate by Intrinsic Subtype18 Weeks
Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as absence of invasive carcinoma within the breast and axillary lymph nodes following preoperative treatment. Participants whose disease is not surgically resectable following preoperative treatment are considered as not having pCR. PAM50 analysis was performed on the biopsy specimen taken on day 1. Participants' pCR was tabulated according to the intrinsic subtype and the association of intrinsic subtype (Estrogen receptor 2 - enriched vs. other) with pCR was assessed using Fisher's exact test.
SecondaryResidual Disease Rate by Intrinsic Subtype18 Weeks
Residual Disease Rate is the percentage of participants who do not achieve Pathologic complete response (pCR) by the end of preoperative treatment. pCR is defined as absence of invasive carcinoma within the breast and axillary lymph nodes following preoperative treatment. Residual disease within the breast at time of mastectomy was assessed by microarray analysis. Residual disease rate was reported by intrinsic subtype identified using day 1 RNAseq analysis.
SecondaryPredictive Accuracy Rate of Pre-Treatment Versus On-Treatment Tumor Biopsy RNA Sequencing Profiles18 Weeks
Tumor RNA expression from pre-treatment (Day 1) and on-treatment (Day 8) biopsies were evaluated to see if the expression profiles had predictive accuracy of pCR. pCR is defined as absence of invasive carcinoma within the breast and axillary lymph nodes following preoperative treatment. Participants whose disease is not surgically resectable following preoperative treatment are considered as not having pCR. The biopsies were analyzed by differential expression analysis using standard procedures in R package, limma. A predictive Random Forest model was trained using leave-pair-out-cross-validation with the 80 genes most associated with pCR and/or non-pCR. This model gives an accuracy rate, which indicates the percentage of time that the gene profile predicts pCR or non-pCR for both the pre-treatment and on-treatment profiles. An increase in accuracy for the on-treatment profile would indicate an adaptive response within the tumor associated with resistance to HER2 directed therapies.
SecondaryResidual Cancer Burden Rate by ctDNA Profile Change18 weeks
Residual cancer burden is calculated an then categorized based on the methods described in the following: Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(28): 4414-22. This method uses tumor size, the proportion of that tumor that is invasive carcinoma, the number of axillary lymph nodes containing metastatic carcinoma and the diameter of the largest metastasis in an axillary lymph node. These parameters are combined in a formula that outputs a RCB index. This index is divided into 4 categories: RCB-0, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III. The previous categories are in order of increasing severity of RCB. Biopsy/blood will be collected on day 1 and day 8 of therapy for analysis of circulating biomarkers, including ctDNA. Associations between change in ctDNA during therapy and residual cancer burden at the time of definitive surgery will be evaluated.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentages of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response18 weeks
Subjects evaluable for response. Participants are not being evaluated based on their post-operative treatment option. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYResidual Cancer Burden Rate18 Weeks
Subjects evaluable for response. Participants are not being evaluated based on their post-operative treatment option. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Congestive Heart Failure1 year and 8 months
Participants evaluable for adverse events. Participants are not being evaluated based on their post-operative treatment option. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMedian Disease Free Survival63 months
Subjects evaluable for response. Participants are not being evaluated based on their post-operative treatment option. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYMedian Time to Treatment Failure63 monthsSubjects evaluable for response. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYMedian Overall Survival63 monthsSubjects evaluable for response. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPathological Complete Response Rate by Intrinsic Subtype18 WeeksNo samples collected since very few patients had residual disease and sample size would be too small for any meaningful analysis.
SECONDARYResidual Disease Rate by Intrinsic Subtype18 WeeksNo samples collected since very few patients had residual disease and sample size would be too small for any meaningful analysis.
SECONDARYPredictive Accuracy Rate of Pre-Treatment Versus On-Treatment Tumor Biopsy RNA Sequencing Profiles18 WeeksSubjects evaluable for response. Two options are provided to the participants in order to best treat them based on the nature of their disease.percent accuracyNUMBER
SECONDARYResidual Cancer Burden Rate by ctDNA Profile Change18 weeksData was not collected due to a lack of clinical research funding.

Results by group11

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentages of Participants With Pathologic Complete ResponseTreatment Arm4890% Confidence Interval 29 to 67percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden RateTreatment ArmRCB-04890% Confidence Interval 29 to 67percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden RateTreatment ArmRCB-I3390% Confidence Interval 17 to 54percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden RateTreatment ArmRCB-II590% Confidence Interval 2 to 21percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden RateTreatment ArmRCB-III1490% Confidence Interval 4 to 33percentage of participants
Number of Participants With Congestive Heart FailureTreatment Arm0Participants
Median Disease Free SurvivalTreatment ArmNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAmonths
Median Time to Treatment FailureTreatment ArmNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAmonths
Median Overall SurvivalTreatment ArmNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAmonths
Predictive Accuracy Rate of Pre-Treatment Versus On-Treatment Tumor Biopsy RNA Sequencing ProfilesTreatment ArmDay 1 Biopsy50percent accuracy

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment Arm23
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment Arm21
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment Arm2

Adverse events112

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment Arm523
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment Arm323
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment Arm323
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Arm123
otherEar and labyrinth disorders - Other, specifyEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment Arm123
otherBlurred visionEye disordersTreatment Arm423
otherEye disorders - Other, specifyEye disordersTreatment Arm123
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Arm223
otherBloatingGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Arm223
otherCheilitisGastrointestinal disordersTreatment Arm123

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Arm023
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Arm2223
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Arm623

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
35923923DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01796197

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01796197/events?page=2