ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01802333

Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride or Idarubicin and Cytarabine With or Without Vorinostat in Treating Younger Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT01802333, Phase 3, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2018-12-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride or Idarubicin and Cytarabine With or Without Vorinostat in Treating Younger Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Trials, record NCT01802333. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01802333

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride or Idarubicin and Cytarabine With or Without Vorinostat in Treating Younger Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT number
NCT01802333
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
754 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Untreated Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Interventions
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride, Idarubicin, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Vorinostat
First posted
2013-03-01
Last updated
2018-12-19
Results first posted
2018-12-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryEvent-free Survival (EFS)EFS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year EFS reported
EFS is calculated for all patients from the date of initial registration on study until the first of the following: death from any cause, relapse from remission (CR or CRi) or completion of protocol Induction/Re-Induction therapy without documentation of CR or CRi. 2-year EFS by arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. EFS will be compared between Arm I and Arm III and between Arm II and Arm III using Cox proportional hazards regression.
PrimaryRate of Allogeneic HCTUp to 5 years
The goal of the transplant objective is to determine whether it is possible to conduct allogeneic HCT on 60% or more of adults with high-risk AML in first complete remission (alternative). If 40% or fewer of high-risk patients in CR can be transplanted, the proposed transplant support system will not be considered feasible. A one-sided binomial test compared to the null transplant rate will be conducted.
SecondaryDisease-free Survival (DFS) Among High Risk PatientsDFS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year DFS reported
DFS is calculated for patients who have achieved a CR or CRi (complete response with incomplete blood count recovery). DFS will be measured from the date of CR or CRi until relapse from CR or CRi for death from any cause. Observation is censored at the date of last follow-up for patients last known to be alive without report of relapse. 2-year DFS for high risk patients will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryEFS of Arm I Compared to Arm IIEFS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year EFS reported
EFS is calculated for all patients from the date of initial registration on study until the first of the following: death from any cause, relapse from remission (CR or CRi) or completion of protocol Induction/Re-Induction therapy without documentation of CR or CRi. A two-sided test of the hazard ratio (HR) of 7:3: IA (versus the null hypothesis of HR =1) will be done using a proportional hazards regression model with the stratification factors included as covariates. 2-year EFS by arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryFrequency and Severity of ToxicitiesUp to 5 yearsNumber of patients with Grade 3-5 adverse events that were possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported by given type of adverse event.
OtherPrevalence of the Mutation NPM1 in Patients on This Study.BaselineTo estimate the prevalence of the mutation NPM1 in this patient population.
OtherPrevalence of the Mutations IDH1, IDH2, TET2, DMT3A in Patients on This StudyBaselineTo estimate the prevalence of these mutations in this patient population. This objective will be analyzed as funding allows.
OtherCytogenetic Risk Distribution of Patients on This StudyBaselineTo estimate the cytogenetic risk distribution of patients on this study.
OtherOverall Survival (OS)OS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year OS reported
To compare OS between patients who receive standard 7+3 therapy or IA to patients who receive IA + vorinostat. OS is calculated for all patients from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. 2-year OS by arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
OtherComplete Response (CR) RateUp to 5 years
To compare the complete response rate between patients who receive standard 7+3 therapy or IA to patients who receive IA + vorinostat. Complete response is defined as: ANC \>= 1,000/mcl, platelet count \>= 100,000/mcl, \< 5% bone marrow blasts, no Auer rods, no evidence of extramedullary disease (no requirements for marrow cellularity or hemoglobin concentration)

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYEvent-free Survival (EFS)EFS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year EFS reportedEligible patientsProportion of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYRate of Allogeneic HCTUp to 5 yearsEligible patients with high-risk AML who achieved CR or CRi, regardless of treatment arm.percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease-free Survival (DFS) Among High Risk PatientsDFS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year DFS reportedEligible, high risk patients, regardless of treatment arm.Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEFS of Arm I Compared to Arm IIEFS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year EFS reportedEligible patientsProportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFrequency and Severity of ToxicitiesUp to 5 yearsEligible patients who started treatmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPrevalence of the Mutation NPM1 in Patients on This Study.BaselineEligible patients with known NPM1 status at baselinepercentage of patientsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPrevalence of the Mutations IDH1, IDH2, TET2, DMT3A in Patients on This StudyBaselineThere was not sufficient funding to test patients for IDH1, IDH2, TET2, or DMT3A. Therefore, this objective was not completed.
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDCytogenetic Risk Distribution of Patients on This StudyBaselineEligible patients with known cytogenetic risk at baselinepercentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDOverall Survival (OS)OS assessed for up to 5 years, 2 year OS reportedEligible patientsProportion of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDComplete Response (CR) RateUp to 5 yearsEligible patientsPercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group620

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Event-free Survival (EFS)Arm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)0.3695% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 0.42Proportion of participants
Event-free Survival (EFS)Arm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)0.4195% Confidence Interval 0.35 to 0.46Proportion of participants
Event-free Survival (EFS)Arm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)0.3795% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 0.43Proportion of participants
Rate of Allogeneic HCTHigh Risk Patients in First Complete Remission6595% Confidence Interval 56 to 74percentage of patients
Disease-free Survival (DFS) Among High Risk PatientsHigh Risk Patients0.3095% Confidence Interval 0.21 to 0.39Proportion of participants
EFS of Arm I Compared to Arm IIArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)0.3695% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 0.42Proportion of participants
EFS of Arm I Compared to Arm IIArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)0.4195% Confidence Interval 0.35 to 0.46Proportion of participants
Frequency and Severity of ToxicitiesArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)Abdominal distension1Participants
Frequency and Severity of ToxicitiesArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)Abdominal distension0Participants
Frequency and Severity of ToxicitiesArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)Abdominal distension1Participants

Participant flow21

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)263
Overall StudySTARTEDArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)267
Overall StudySTARTEDArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)224
Overall StudyHigh Risk PatientsArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)60
Overall StudyHigh Risk PatientsArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)61
Overall StudyHigh Risk PatientsArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)38
Overall StudyHigh Risk Patients Achieved CR/CRiArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)38
Overall StudyHigh Risk Patients Achieved CR/CRiArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)40
Overall StudyHigh Risk Patients Achieved CR/CRiArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)29
Overall StudyKnown NPM1 Status at BaselineArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)169

Adverse events633

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)185261
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)185259
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)137211
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)158261
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)170259
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)120211
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)11261
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)9259
otherSinus bradycardiaCardiac disordersArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)12211
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)44261

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)126261
Total, all-cause mortalityArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)114259
Total, all-cause mortalityArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)103211
Total, other adverse eventsArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)249261
Total, other adverse eventsArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)254259
Total, other adverse eventsArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)206211
Total, serious adverse eventsArm I (Standard Dose Cytarabine, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride)11261
Total, serious adverse eventsArm II (High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)27259
Total, serious adverse eventsArm III (Vorinostat, High-dose Cytarabine, Idarubicin)75211

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37935977DERIVEDPubMed
38830960DERIVEDPubMed

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10CA180888SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNLARA, PRIMO N.; HERSHMAN, DAWNUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVISNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2026NIH RePORTER
U10CA032102Southwest Oncology Group Treatment GrantBLANKE, CHARLES D.OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01802333

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01802333/results?page=2