ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01809314

An Observational Study of Epoetin Beta (NeoRecormon) in Participants With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

NCT01809314, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-08-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Observational Study of Epoetin Beta (NeoRecormon) in Participants With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy. Trials, record NCT01809314. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01809314

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Observational Study of Epoetin Beta (NeoRecormon) in Participants With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT01809314
Status
Completed
Enrollment
1,167 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Anemia
Interventions
Epoetin beta
First posted
2013-03-12
Last updated
2016-08-19
Results first posted
2016-08-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Hemoglobin (Hb) Level From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline, Month 4The change in Hb level from Baseline to the EOT visit at Month 4 was averaged among all participants and expressed in grams per liter (g/L).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline, Month 4
ECOG performance status was determined at Baseline and at the EOT visit at Month 4. The assessment used a 3-point scale, including scores of 0 (fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction), 1 (restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work), or 2 (ambulatory for more than 50% of waking hours and capable of all self care but unable to carry out any work activities). The traditional 6-point scale was not valid because only participants with a performance status of 0, 1, or 2 were eligible for the study. The percentage of participants by change in ECOG performance status was reported. For example, the percentage of participants with ECOG performance status of 0 at Baseline and 2 at EOT is shown in the table as "Baseline 0, EOT 2". Transition to a lower performance status indicates improved/increased independence.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyBaseline to Month 1, Month 1 to 2, Month 2 to 3, Month 3 to 4The percentage of participants who required blood transfusions was reported at each assessment visit and was based on the 1-month period preceding the respective visit.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Hemoglobin (Hb) Level From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline, Month 4All Participants Enrolled; only those who provided data at all study visits were included in the analysis.g/LMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline, Month 4
All Participants Enrolled; only those who provided data at all study visits were included in the analysis. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the total combined number of participants who provided data for the endpoint. The number of participants used in the denominator for each calculation (n) was based on the ECOG status at Baseline.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyBaseline to Month 1, Month 1 to 2, Month 2 to 3, Month 3 to 4
All Participants Enrolled. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the total combined number of participants who provided data for the endpoint. The number of participants who provided data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Level From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT)NeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia14.5895% Confidence Interval 12.684 to 16.478g/L
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 0, EOT 0 (n=71)77.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 0, EOT 1 (n=71)19.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 0, EOT 2 (n=71)2.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 1, EOT 0 (n=168)23.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 1, EOT 1 (n=168)67.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 1, EOT 2 (n=168)8.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 2, EOT 0 (n=33)21.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 2, EOT 1 (n=33)48.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTNeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaBaseline 2, EOT 2 (n=33)30.3percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia1,167
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia422
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia745

Adverse events16

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDyspnoeaCardiac disordersNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherGastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disordersNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherAstheniaGeneral disordersNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherDrug hypersensitivityImmune system disordersNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherPneumoniaInfections and infestationsNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherAbdominal cavity drainageSurgical and medical proceduresNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherHospitalisationSurgical and medical proceduresNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
otherTransfusionSurgical and medical proceduresNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia21,167
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167
seriousFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia11,167

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia
Total, other adverse eventsNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia61,167
Total, serious adverse eventsNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia71,167

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01809314

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01809314/registered