ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01815840

A Study of Two Vismodegib Regimens in Participants With Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas

NCT01815840, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-08-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Two Vismodegib Regimens in Participants With Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas. Trials, record NCT01815840. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01815840

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Two Vismodegib Regimens in Participants With Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas
NCT number
NCT01815840
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
229 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
Vismodegib, Placebo
First posted
2013-03-21
Last updated
2017-09-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-003305-10
Results first posted
2016-08-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)Baseline; Week 73The total number of clinically evident basal cell carcinomas = the total number of target and/or non-target lesions present in individual participants.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesBaseline to Week 73The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment (due either to adverse event, refusal of treatment, or withdrawal of consent) was summarized by treatment group.
SecondaryMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Size of Three Target Basal Cell Carcinoma Lesions in Individual Participants at Week 73Baseline; Week 73The three target basal cell carcinoma lesions = the three largest visible lesions, at least 5 mm in the longest diameter, in individual participants.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in the Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73Baseline; Week 73
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73Baseline; Week 73
SecondaryPercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 85 (12 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 85
SecondaryPercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 97 (24 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 97
SecondaryPercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 125 (52 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 125
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse EventUp to 125 weeks
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Symptom Domain Score at Week 73Baseline; Week 73
The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their symptoms, and their answers were combined into a composite Symptom Domain Score. Scores range from 0 ("never bothered") to 100 ("always bothered").

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)Baseline; Week 73
Participants in the Intent-to-Treat analysis population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis. The last observation carried forward method was used.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesBaseline to Week 73Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population, defined as all randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Size of Three Target Basal Cell Carcinoma Lesions in Individual Participants at Week 73Baseline; Week 73Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in the Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73Baseline; Week 73Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population, defined as all randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73Baseline; Week 73Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 85 (12 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 85Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 97 (24 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 97Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 125 (52 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 125Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse EventUp to 125 weeksSafety Analysis Population: participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) who received at least one dose of study treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Symptom Domain Score at Week 73Baseline; Week 73Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.percent changeMEAN

Results by group38

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)Vismodegib Intermittent Schedule62.9Standard Deviation 52.01percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule54.9Standard Deviation 54.85percent change
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Intermittent ScheduleOverall37.195% Confidence Interval 28.3 to 46.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleOverall41.695% Confidence Interval 32.4 to 51.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Intermittent ScheduleAdverse Events20.795% Confidence Interval 13.7 to 29.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleAdverse Events27.495% Confidence Interval 19.5 to 36.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Intermittent ScheduleRefused Treatment6.095% Confidence Interval 2.5 to 12.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleRefused Treatment2.795% Confidence Interval 0.6 to 7.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Intermittent ScheduleWithdrew Consent10.395% Confidence Interval 5.5 to 17.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleWithdrew Consent11.595% Confidence Interval 6.3 to 18.9percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVismodegib Intermittent Schedule116
Overall StudySTARTEDVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule113
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVismodegib Intermittent Schedule57
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule50
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVismodegib Intermittent Schedule59
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule63

Adverse events186

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherMuscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Intermittent Schedule83114
otherMuscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule94113
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Intermittent Schedule18114
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule16113
otherMyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Intermittent Schedule18114
otherMyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule12113
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Intermittent Schedule7114
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule7113
otherDysgeusiaNervous system disordersVismodegib Intermittent Schedule76114
otherDysgeusiaNervous system disordersVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule75113

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVismodegib Intermittent Schedule
Total, all-cause mortalityVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule
Total, other adverse eventsVismodegib Intermittent Schedule107114
Total, other adverse eventsVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule108113
Total, serious adverse eventsVismodegib Intermittent Schedule24114
Total, serious adverse eventsVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule23113

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28188086DERIVEDPubMed
28325399DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Vismodegib Intermittent Schedule vs Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01815840

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01815840/results?page=2