ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01816295

A Study in Men With Low Testosterone to Measure the Effects of Testosterone Solution on Testosterone Levels, Sex Drive and Energy

NCT01816295, Phase 3, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2015-10-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study in Men With Low Testosterone to Measure the Effects of Testosterone Solution on Testosterone Levels, Sex Drive and Energy. Trials, record NCT01816295. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01816295

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study in Men With Low Testosterone to Measure the Effects of Testosterone Solution on Testosterone Levels, Sex Drive and Energy
NCT number
NCT01816295
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
715 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Hypogonadism
Interventions
Testosterone Solution, Placebo Solution
First posted
2013-03-22
Last updated
2015-12-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-004866-16
Results first posted
2015-10-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Total Serum Testosterone Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12Week 12Normal range for total serum testosterone was defined as 300 to 1050 nanograms per deciliter (ng/dL).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Sexual Arousal, Interest, and Drive (SAID) Scale ScoresBaseline, Week 12
The SAID Scale is a self-administered instrument used to assess sexual arousal, interest, and sex drive in men with symptomatic hypogonadism. The SAID consists of 5 questions that were scored on a scale from 1 to 5, with "5" corresponding to greater levels of sexual arousal, interest, or drive. The SAID Scale total score was computed by summing the item scores and linearly transforming the sum to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores corresponding to greater sexual arousal, interest, and drive. Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group and the baseline value as covariates.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Hypogonadism Energy Diary (HED) ScoresBaseline, Week 12
The HED is a self-administered instrument used to assess real-time energy levels in men with symptomatic hypogonadism. It consists of 2 questions that were scored on a scale from 0 to 10, with "10" corresponding to "Full of Energy" or "Not Tired at All" (The Tiredness scale was reverse-mapped, as it was collected with "10" corresponding to "Extreme Tiredness"). The questionnaire was completed 3 times daily (forming 6 unique items) for 7 consecutive days. Item scores were computed by averaging the values for each item across 7 days. If more than 2 days were missing for an item, the item score was missing. The total score was computed by summing the item scores and linearly transforming the sum to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores corresponding to greater energy. If any item score was missing, the total score was missing. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA with treatment group and the baseline value as covariates.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) >4 Nanogram/Milliliter (ng/mL)Double Blind Baseline, Week 12, Open Label Baseline, Week 36
OtherChange From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
The IPSS is a self-administered instrument used to assess for the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. The IPSS consists of 7 questions that were scored on a scale from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms), for a total score range of 0 to 35. Higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using ANCOVA with treatment group and the baseline value as covariates.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Total Serum Testosterone Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12Week 12All randomized participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment and had non-missing testosterone concentration at week 12.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Sexual Arousal, Interest, and Drive (SAID) Scale ScoresBaseline, Week 12
Randomized participants who reported low sex drive at baseline with non-missing SAID Scale data at baseline and at least one post baseline visit. Missing data endpoints were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Hypogonadism Energy Diary (HED) ScoresBaseline, Week 12Randomized participants who reported low energy at baseline with non-missing HED questionnaire at baseline and at least one post baseline visit. Missing data endpoints were imputed using LOCF.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Baseline, Week 12, Week 36All randomized participants with non-missing baseline IPSS measurement and at least one non-missing post baseline IPSS measurement. Missing data endpoints were imputed using LOCF.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) >4 Nanogram/Milliliter (ng/mL)Double Blind Baseline, Week 12, Open Label Baseline, Week 36All participants with non-missing PSA result at the specified time point.participantsNUMBER

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Total Serum Testosterone Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12Placebo Solution43participants
Number of Participants With Total Serum Testosterone Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12Testosterone Solution217participants
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Sexual Arousal, Interest, and Drive (SAID) Scale ScoresPlacebo Solution6.3Standard Error 0.99units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Sexual Arousal, Interest, and Drive (SAID) Scale ScoresTestosterone Solution11.4Standard Error 1.02units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Hypogonadism Energy Diary (HED) ScoresPlacebo Solution7.5Standard Error 0.87units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Hypogonadism Energy Diary (HED) ScoresTestosterone Solution10.5Standard Error 0.89units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Placebo SolutionChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.7Standard Error 0.24units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Testosterone SolutionChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.9Standard Error 0.24units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Placebo SolutionChange from Baseline to Week 36 (n=247, 255)-0.7Standard Error 0.28units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Testosterone SolutionChange from Baseline to Week 36 (n=247, 255)-0.7Standard Error 0.27units on a scale

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double Blind PhaseSTARTEDPlacebo Solution357
Double Blind PhaseSTARTEDTestosterone Solution358
Double Blind PhaseReceived Study DrugPlacebo Solution356
Double Blind PhaseReceived Study DrugTestosterone Solution354
Double Blind PhaseCOMPLETEDPlacebo Solution294
Double Blind PhaseCOMPLETEDTestosterone Solution302
Double Blind PhaseNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Solution63
Double Blind PhaseNOT COMPLETEDTestosterone Solution56
OLE PhaseSTARTEDPlacebo Solution275
OLE PhaseSTARTEDTestosterone Solution283

Adverse events1,254

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Solution - Double Blind13561
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTestosterone Solution - Double Blind13542
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTestosterone Solution - OLE05580
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Solution - Double Blind03560
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersTestosterone Solution - Double Blind03540
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersTestosterone Solution - OLE15581
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Solution - Double Blind03560
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersTestosterone Solution - Double Blind13541
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersTestosterone Solution - OLE15581
otherPolycythaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Solution - Double Blind03560

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Solution - Double Blind
Total, all-cause mortalityTestosterone Solution - Double Blind
Total, all-cause mortalityTestosterone Solution - OLE
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Solution - Double Blind143356
Total, other adverse eventsTestosterone Solution - Double Blind148354
Total, other adverse eventsTestosterone Solution - OLE252558
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Solution - Double Blind8356
Total, serious adverse eventsTestosterone Solution - Double Blind4354
Total, serious adverse eventsTestosterone Solution - OLE24558

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26498057DERIVEDPubMed
38224135DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Testosterone Solution vs Placebo Solution: Number of Participants With Total Serum Testosterone Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01816295

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01816295/events?page=2