ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01817790

Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms

NCT01817790, Phase 3, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2014-04-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms. Trials, record NCT01817790. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01817790

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms
NCT number
NCT01817790
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
626 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Allergic Rhinitis, Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
Fluticasone propionate, Placebo
First posted
2013-03-25
Last updated
2014-04-03
Results first posted
2014-04-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS)Baseline to 14 days
The Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. Subjects completed rTOSS in the evening (PM rTOSS; 12 hours post morning nasal spray use) and once in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use). Daily (i.e. during one dosing interval) rTOSS is defined as the average of the PM rTOSS and the AM rTOSS of the next day prior to AM dosing. The mean change from baseline in (daily, AM, PM) TOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days; from Day 0 PM to Day 14 AM) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in AM rTOSSBaseline to 14 days
rTOSS is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/ burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For AM rToss, subjects completed rTOSS in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use). The mean change from baseline in AM rTOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in PM rTOSSBaseline to 14 days
rTOSS is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/ burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For PM rTOSS, subjects completed rTOSS in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM rTOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningBaseline to 14 days
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye itching/burning using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye itching and burning) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningBaseline to 14 days
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye itching/burning using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye itching and burning) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/WateringBaseline to 14 days
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye tearing/watering using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye tearing/watering) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/WateringBaseline to 14 days
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye tearing/watering using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye tearing/watering) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye RednessBaseline to 14 days
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye redness using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye redness) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye RednessBaseline to 14 days
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye redness using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9. For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use. The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye redness) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in AM Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS)Baseline to 14 days
Instantaneous total ocular symptom scores (iTOSS) assessments are self perceived evaluation of symptom severity immediately before the dose (how the subject feels at that point in time). iTOSS (possible score of 0-9) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores for eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe. Mean changes from baseline were calculated as treatment period iTOSS minus baseline iTOSS.

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS)Baseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in AM rTOSSBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in PM rTOSSBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/WateringBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/WateringBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye RednessBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye RednessBaseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in AM Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS)Baseline to 14 daysAll subjects who were randomized into the study and received at least one dose of study product were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis was conducted on ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group50

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS)Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.91Standard Deviation 1.625Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS)Placebo Nasal Spray-0.63Standard Deviation 1.525Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in AM rTOSSFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.96Standard Deviation 1.627Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in AM rTOSSPlacebo Nasal Spray-0.68Standard Deviation 1.573Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in PM rTOSSFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.87Standard Deviation 1.735Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in PM rTOSSPlacebo Nasal Spray-0.60Standard Deviation 1.577Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.35Standard Deviation 0.581Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningPlacebo Nasal Spray-0.28Standard Deviation 0.553Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray-0.33Standard Deviation 0.626Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/BurningPlacebo Nasal Spray-0.24Standard Deviation 0.554Score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray314
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Nasal Spray312
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray310
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Nasal Spray304
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Nasal Spray8

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPainGeneral disordersFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray03140
otherPainGeneral disordersPlacebo Nasal Spray13121
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray13141
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo Nasal Spray23122
otherThirstGeneral disordersFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray13141
otherThirstGeneral disordersPlacebo Nasal Spray03120
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray03140
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo Nasal Spray23122
otherGastrointestinal ViralInfections and infestationsFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray13141
otherGastrointestinal ViralInfections and infestationsPlacebo Nasal Spray03120

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Nasal Spray
Total, other adverse eventsFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray8314
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Nasal Spray8312
Total, serious adverse eventsFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray0314
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Nasal Spray0312

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25624132DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01817790

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01817790/results?page=2