ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01818752

Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

NCT01818752, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2017-08-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Trials, record NCT01818752. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01818752

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
NCT number
NCT01818752
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
955 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Carfilzomib, Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone
First posted
2013-03-26
Last updated
2019-08-26
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-005283-97
Results first posted
2017-08-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for PFS was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The duration of PFS was censored for participants with no baseline and/or post-baseline disease assessments, who started a new anti-cancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression after missed disease assessment of 100 consecutive days or longer, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cutoff date, including lost to follow-up prior to disease progression. Participants were evaluated for disease response and progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC), determined centrally using a validated computer algorithm in a blinded manner.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for OS was 22.2 and 22.5 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause). Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up as of the data analysis cut-off date were censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate
Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.
Disease response was evaluated according to the IMWG-URC using a validated computer algorithm. Overall response was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline. PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by ≥ 90% or to \< 200 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.
SecondaryComplete Response Rate
Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.
Complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who achieved a sCR or CR per the IMWG-URC as their best response. sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy
From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.
Neuropathy events were defined as Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy as specified by peripheral neuropathy Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query, narrow (scope) (SMQN) terms. Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by neurologic exam and graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03: Grade 1: Asymptomatic; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death.
SecondaryEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresBaseline, weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated self-rating questionnaire including 30 items used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale was scored between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better Global Health Status/QOL.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events
From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.
Adverse events (AEs)were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 4.03, where GRADE 1 = Mild; GRADE 2 = Moderate; GRADE 3 = Severe; GRADE 4 = Life-threatening; GRADE 5 = Fatal. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met 1 or more of the following criteria: * Death * Life-threatening * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Important medical event that jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-related adverse events are adverse events considered related to at least 1 investigational product by the investigator, including those with unknown relationship.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for PFS was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for OS was 22.2 and 22.5 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.Intent-to-treat populationmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate
Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.
Intent-to-treat populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYComplete Response Rate
Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.
Intent-to-treat populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy
From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment (i.e., carfilzomib, bortezomib, melphalan, or prednisone).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresBaseline, weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48Intent-to treat population with available data at each time point.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events
From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.
Safety populationparticipantsNUMBER

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone22.195% Confidence Interval 20.8 to 24.4months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone22.395% Confidence Interval 20.9 to 26.7months
Overall Survival (OS)Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAmonths
Overall Survival (OS)Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNA95% Confidence Interval 31.5 to NAmonths
Overall Response RateBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone78.895% Confidence Interval 74.9 to 82.4percentage of participants
Overall Response RateCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone84.395% Confidence Interval 80.7 to 87.5percentage of participants
Complete Response RateBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone23.195% Confidence Interval 19.4 to 27.1percentage of participants
Complete Response RateCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone25.995% Confidence Interval 22.1 to 30.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral NeuropathyBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone35.195% Confidence Interval 30.8 to 39.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral NeuropathyCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone2.595% Confidence Interval 1.3 to 4.4percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone477
Overall StudySTARTEDCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone478
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone470
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone474
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone290
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone280
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone187
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone198

Adverse events690

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone143470
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone168474
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone39470
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone34474
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone121470
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone121474
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone91470
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone84474
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone27470
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone10474

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone
Total, all-cause mortalityCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone
Total, other adverse eventsBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone437470
Total, other adverse eventsCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone437474
Total, serious adverse eventsBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone198470
Total, serious adverse eventsCarfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone235474

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26771810DERIVEDPubMed
29991494BACKGROUNDPubMed
30819926BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01818752

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01818752/results?page=2