ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01822535

Body Temperature in Persons With Tetraplegia When Exposed to Cold

NCT01822535, Phase 4, Completed, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center; results first posted 2016-03-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Body Temperature in Persons With Tetraplegia When Exposed to Cold. Trials, record NCT01822535. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01822535

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Body Temperature in Persons With Tetraplegia When Exposed to Cold
NCT number
NCT01822535
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
30 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Conditions
Tetraplegia, Hypothermia, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Interventions
Midodrine hydrochloride
First posted
2013-04-02
Last updated
2016-03-04
Results first posted
2016-03-04
Limitations and caveats
Did not assess cognitive performance a third time, after Tcore in the group with tetraplegia had returned to baseline levels.~Study had a small sample size, and only included males.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryVisit 1: Percent Change in Core Body TemperatureBaseline, Up to 2 hours
We will test the effects of cool temperature (64°F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the ability to maintain a constant body temperature (e.g., core temperature of 98.6°F) in persons with tetraplegia through comparing the percent changes in core body temperatures between groups from baseline to after cool exposure.
PrimaryVisit 2: Percent Change in Core Body Temperature With MidodrineBaseline, Baseline Post-midodrine, Up to 2 hours
We will test the effects of midodrine on the ability to maintain a constant body temperature (e.g., core temperature of 98.6°F) after exposure to cool temperatures (64°F) in persons with tetraplegia through comparing the percent changes in core body temperature during visit 1 to percent changes in core body temperature during visit 2.
SecondaryVisit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Stroop InterferenceBaseline, Up to 2 hours
Cognitive performance will be evaluated using the Interference T-Scores obtained using the Stroop Color and Word Test. We will measure the change in cognitive performance in persons with tetraplegia after exposure to a cool environment (64°F) of up to 120 min in the seated position. Note: Interference T-Scores are derived from the difference between the raw Color-Word score and the projected Color-Word score (which is, in turn, based on the raw scores obtained in the Word and Color portions of the Test). Lower scores indicate poorer performance, and a positive percent change in T-scores indicates improved performance.
SecondaryVisit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Delayed RecallBaseline, Up to 2 hours
Cognitive performance will be evaluated using the Delayed Recall obtained using the Memory section of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). We will measure the change in cognitive performance in persons with tetraplegia after exposure to a cool environment (64°F) of up to 120 min in the seated position. Note: Scores are based on individual performance. All subjects are asked to remember two lists of five words (one list during baseline, and one list during cool Challenge). Lower scores indicate poorer performance, and a positive percent change in indicates improved cognitive performance.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYVisit 1: Percent Change in Core Body TemperatureBaseline, Up to 2 hours
Only the subjects with tetraplegia who demonstrated sympathetic interruption (insignificant decreases in distal skin temperatures, distal microvascular blood flow (LDF) and decreases of 1.0°C or greater in Tcore during cool exposure), and their matched able-bodied controls were analyzed.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYVisit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Stroop InterferenceBaseline, Up to 2 hours
Only the subjects with tetraplegia who demonstrated sympathetic interruption (insignificant decreases in distal skin temperatures, distal microvascular blood flow (LDF) and decreases of 1.0°C or greater in Tcore during cool exposure), and their matched able-bodied controls were analyzed.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYVisit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Delayed RecallBaseline, Up to 2 hours
Only the subjects with tetraplegia who demonstrated sympathetic interruption (insignificant decreases in distal skin temperatures, distal microvascular blood flow (LDF) and decreases of 1.0°C or greater in Tcore during cool exposure), and their matched able-bodied controls were analyzed.
Percent ChangeMEAN
PRIMARYVisit 2: Percent Change in Core Body Temperature With MidodrineBaseline, Baseline Post-midodrine, Up to 2 hoursSubjects analyzed were individuals who completed visit 1 of testing.Percent ChangeMEAN

Results by group7

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Visit 1: Percent Change in Core Body TemperatureTetraplegia-1.2Standard Deviation 0.33Percent Change
Visit 1: Percent Change in Core Body TemperatureAble-bodied0.05Standard Deviation 0.21Percent Change
Visit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Stroop InterferenceTetraplegia-3.9Standard Deviation 3.8Percent Change
Visit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Stroop InterferenceAble-bodied5.4Standard Deviation 9.2Percent Change
Visit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Delayed RecallTetraplegia-55.2Standard Deviation 47.4Percent Change
Visit 1: Percent Changes in Cognitive Performance - Delayed RecallAble-bodied (AB)6.4Standard Deviation 49.7Percent Change
Visit 2: Percent Change in Core Body Temperature With MidodrineTetraplegia-2.2Standard Deviation 0.9Percent Change

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Visit 1 - Tetraplegia and Able-BodiedSTARTEDTetraplegia17
Visit 1 - Tetraplegia and Able-BodiedSTARTEDAble-bodied (AB)13
Visit 1 - Tetraplegia and Able-BodiedCOMPLETEDTetraplegia11
Visit 1 - Tetraplegia and Able-BodiedCOMPLETEDAble-bodied (AB)11
Visit 1 - Tetraplegia and Able-BodiedNOT COMPLETEDTetraplegia6
Visit 1 - Tetraplegia and Able-BodiedNOT COMPLETEDAble-bodied (AB)2
Visit 2 - Tetraplegia Only - DrugSTARTEDTetraplegia11
Visit 2 - Tetraplegia Only - DrugSTARTEDAble-bodied (AB)0
Visit 2 - Tetraplegia Only - DrugCOMPLETEDTetraplegia10
Visit 2 - Tetraplegia Only - DrugCOMPLETEDAble-bodied (AB)0

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersNo Drug: Tetraplegia1171
otherNeck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersNo Drug: Able-bodied0130
otherNeck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDrug: Tetraplegia0110
seriousAutonomic DysreflexiaNervous system disordersNo Drug: Tetraplegia1171
seriousAutonomic DysreflexiaNervous system disordersNo Drug: Able-bodied0130
seriousAutonomic DysreflexiaNervous system disordersDrug: Tetraplegia1111

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNo Drug: Tetraplegia
Total, all-cause mortalityNo Drug: Able-bodied
Total, all-cause mortalityDrug: Tetraplegia
Total, other adverse eventsNo Drug: Tetraplegia117
Total, other adverse eventsNo Drug: Able-bodied013
Total, other adverse eventsDrug: Tetraplegia011
Total, serious adverse eventsNo Drug: Tetraplegia117
Total, serious adverse eventsNo Drug: Able-bodied013
Total, serious adverse eventsDrug: Tetraplegia111

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25531297DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01822535

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01822535/registered