ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01825200

Comparison of the Safety of Flublok® Versus Licensed IIV in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age

NCT01825200, Phase 3, Completed, Protein Sciences Corporation; results first posted 2015-02-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of the Safety of Flublok® Versus Licensed IIV in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age. Trials, record NCT01825200. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01825200

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of the Safety of Flublok® Versus Licensed IIV in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age
NCT number
NCT01825200
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
2,640 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Protein Sciences Corporation
Conditions
Influenza
Interventions
Flublok, Afluria
First posted
2013-04-05
Last updated
2015-02-18
Results first posted
2015-02-18
Limitations and caveats
Rash, urticaria, swelling and edema were self-reported by subjects and most were not observed by investigators. Review by independent experts indicated that 42 of 52 subject-reported events did not represent Type 1 (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Common Hypersensitivity Reactions as Measure of Safety30 DaysNumber of participants who experience a pre-defined common systemic hypersensitivity adverse event, including rash, urticaria, swelling or edema through Day 30 post-vaccine administration.
SecondarySubjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine Administration30 DaysSubjects with at least one serious adverse event and subjects with at least one medically-attended unsolicited adverse event occurring during the 30 days following vaccine administration
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Local and Systemic Events Reported as a Measure of Safety7 DaysNumber of solicited local and systemic events of reactogenicity reported with the help of a memory aid during the seven days following vaccine administration.
SecondarySubjects With at Least One Hypersensitivity Event Reported on Day 0 and Days 0-7 Following Vaccine Administration as a Measure of Safety7 Days
Subjects with at least one pre-defined common systemic hypersensitivity adverse event, including rash, urticaria, swelling or non-dependent edema on Day 0 and for Days 0 to 7 following vaccine administration

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Common Hypersensitivity Reactions as Measure of Safety30 Days
The primary analysis population, includes all randomized subjects who received a dose of study vaccine and for whom some safety data were available after administration of vaccine. Subjects were analyzed according to the vaccine received, regardless of whether this was the treatment group to which they were randomized.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSubjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine Administration30 Days
The primary analysis population, includes all randomized subjects who received a dose of study vaccine and for whom some safety data were available after administration of vaccine. Subjects were analyzed according to the vaccine received, regardless of whether this was the treatment group to which they were randomized.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Local and Systemic Events Reported as a Measure of Safety7 Days
The primary analysis population, includes all randomized subjects who received a dose of study vaccine and for whom some safety data were available after administration of vaccine. Subjects were analyzed according to the vaccine received, regardless of whether this was the treatment group to which they were randomized.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSubjects With at Least One Hypersensitivity Event Reported on Day 0 and Days 0-7 Following Vaccine Administration as a Measure of Safety7 Days
The primary analysis population, includes all randomized subjects who received a dose of study vaccine and for whom some safety data were available after administration of vaccine. Subjects were analyzed according to the vaccine received, regardless of whether this was the treatment group to which they were randomized.
participantsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Common Hypersensitivity Reactions as Measure of SafetyFlublok31participants
Number of Participants With Common Hypersensitivity Reactions as Measure of SafetyAfluria21participants
Subjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine AdministrationFlublokSerious Adverse Events (SAEs)5participants
Subjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine AdministrationAfluriaSerious Adverse Events (SAEs)10participants
Subjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine AdministrationFlublokMedically-Attended Unsolicited Adverse Events53participants
Subjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event in the 30 Days Following Vaccine AdministrationAfluriaMedically-Attended Unsolicited Adverse Events51participants
Number of Participants With Local and Systemic Events Reported as a Measure of SafetyFlublok432participants
Number of Participants With Local and Systemic Events Reported as a Measure of SafetyAfluria480participants
Subjects With at Least One Hypersensitivity Event Reported on Day 0 and Days 0-7 Following Vaccine Administration as a Measure of SafetyFlublokDay 05participants
Subjects With at Least One Hypersensitivity Event Reported on Day 0 and Days 0-7 Following Vaccine Administration as a Measure of SafetyAfluriaDay 03participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFlublok1,319
Overall StudySTARTEDAfluria1,321
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFlublok1,314
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAfluria1,314
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFlublok5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAfluria7

Adverse events28

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersFlublok81,3148
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAfluria121,31312
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersFlublok121,31412
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersAfluria41,3134
seriousCerebellar Stroke SyndromeNervous system disordersFlublok01,3140
seriousCerebellar Stroke SyndromeNervous system disordersAfluria11,3131
seriousSepsisInfections and infestationsFlublok01,3140
seriousSepsisInfections and infestationsAfluria21,3132
seriousMyocardial InfarctionCardiac disordersFlublok11,3141
seriousMyocardial InfarctionCardiac disordersAfluria21,3132

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFlublok
Total, all-cause mortalityAfluria
Total, other adverse eventsFlublok201,314
Total, other adverse eventsAfluria161,313
Total, serious adverse eventsFlublok51,314
Total, serious adverse eventsAfluria101,313

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
26529070DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Flublok vs Afluria: Number of Participants With Local and Systemic Events Reported as a Measure of SafetyTrial comparisons
Flublok vs Afluria: Number of Participants With Common Hypersensitivity Reactions as Measure of SafetyTrial comparisons
Flublok vs Afluria: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01825200

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01825200/events?page=2