ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01833741

A Study of LUMIGAN® RC in the Clinical Setting

NCT01833741, Phase 4, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2013-09-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of LUMIGAN® RC in the Clinical Setting. Trials, record NCT01833741. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01833741

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of LUMIGAN® RC in the Clinical Setting
NCT number
NCT01833741
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
1,137 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Glaucoma, Primary Open Angle, Ocular Hypertension
Interventions
Bimatoprost 0.01%
First posted
2013-04-17
Last updated
2013-09-26
Results first posted
2013-09-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaWeek 12
Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia is graded on a 5 point scale where 0=none (normal), 0.5=trace (trace flush reddish pink), 1=Mild (mild flush reddish color), 2=Moderate (bright red color) and 3=severe (deep bright diffuse redness). Naive patients did not use glaucoma medication prior to study entry.
PrimaryPercentage of Previously Treated (Switched) Patients With Ocular HyperemiaWeek 12
Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia is graded on a 5 point scale where 0=none (normal), 0.5=trace (trace flush reddish pink), 1=Mild (mild flush reddish color), 2=Moderate (bright red color) and 3=severe (deep bright diffuse redness). Previously treated patients used glaucoma medication prior to study entry and were switched from their previous therapy to study treatment.
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Treated With Adjunctive Therapy With Ocular HyperemiaWeek 12
Hyperemia is engorgement of the blood vessels (redness) of the bulbar conjunctiva of the eye (the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye). Hyperemia is graded on a 5 point scale where 0=none (normal), 0.5=trace (trace flush reddish pink), 1=Mild (mild flush reddish color), 2=Moderate (bright red color) and 3=severe (deep bright diffuse redness). Previously treated patients used glaucoma medication prior to study entry and added study treatment as adjunctive therapy.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBaseline, 12 Weeks
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Naive patients did not use glaucoma medication prior to study entry. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase (worsening).
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Previously Treated (Switched) PatientsBaseline, 12 Weeks
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Previously treated patients used glaucoma medication prior to study entry and were switched from their previous therapy to study treatment. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase (worsening).
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Patients Treated With Adjunctive TherapyBaseline, 12 Weeks
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Previously treated patients used glaucoma medication prior to study entry and added study treatment as adjunctive therapy. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase (worsening).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBaseline, Week 6, Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase (worsening).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Previously Treated (Switched) PatientsBaseline, Week 6, Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase (worsening).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Patients Treated With Adjunctive TherapyBaseline, Week 6, Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase (worsening).
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Discontinuing Due to Ocular Adverse Events12 WeeksOcular adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient's eye(s) during study participation, regardless of relationship to treatment.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaWeek 12All patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visit, and who had data for Week 12Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBaseline, 12 WeeksIntent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Previously Treated (Switched) PatientsBaseline, 12 WeeksIntent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Patients Treated With Adjunctive TherapyBaseline, 12 WeeksIntent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBaseline, Week 6, Week 12Intent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Previously Treated (Switched) PatientsBaseline, Week 6, Week 12Intent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Patients Treated With Adjunctive TherapyBaseline, Week 6, Week 12Intent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Discontinuing Due to Ocular Adverse Events12 WeeksIntent to Treat: all patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visitPercentage of PatientsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Previously Treated (Switched) Patients With Ocular HyperemiaWeek 12All patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visit, and who had data for Week 12Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients Treated With Adjunctive Therapy With Ocular HyperemiaWeek 12All patients who were consented and completed the Baseline visit, and who had data for Week 12Percentage of PatientsNUMBER

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaBimatoprost 0.01%0 (none)32.2Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaBimatoprost 0.01%+0.5 (trace)39.8Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaBimatoprost 0.01%+1 (mild)21.3Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaBimatoprost 0.01%+2 (moderate)5.9Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Treatment-Naive Patients With Ocular HyperemiaBimatoprost 0.01%+3 (severe)0.9Percentage of Patients
Percent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBimatoprost 0.01%-30.9Standard Deviation 15.4Percent Change
Percent Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Previously Treated (Switched) PatientsBimatoprost 0.01%-16.1Standard Deviation 18.8Percent Change
Percent Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Patients Treated With Adjunctive TherapyBimatoprost 0.01%-16.1Standard Deviation 20.4Percent Change
Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBimatoprost 0.01%Baseline23.5Standard Deviation 5.8Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye of Treatment-Naive PatientsBimatoprost 0.01%Change from Baseline at Week 6-7.4Standard Deviation 4.9Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBimatoprost 0.01%1,137
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBimatoprost 0.01%997
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBimatoprost 0.01%140

Adverse events3

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousCerebrovascular AccidentCardiac disordersBimatoprost 0.01%11,137
seriousMalaiseGeneral disordersBimatoprost 0.01%11,137
seriousMyocardial InfarctionCardiac disordersBimatoprost 0.01%11,137

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBimatoprost 0.01%
Total, other adverse eventsBimatoprost 0.01%01,137
Total, serious adverse eventsBimatoprost 0.01%31,137

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01833741

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01833741/results?page=2