ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01856530

Effect of Oxytocin Nasal Sprays on Social Behavior in Social Anxiety Disorder

NCT01856530, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Stefan G. Hofmann; results first posted 2014-08-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Oxytocin Nasal Sprays on Social Behavior in Social Anxiety Disorder. Trials, record NCT01856530. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01856530

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Oxytocin Nasal Sprays on Social Behavior in Social Anxiety Disorder
NCT number
NCT01856530
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
60 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stefan G. Hofmann
Conditions
Social Anxiety Disorder
Interventions
Oxytocin, Placebo
First posted
2013-05-17
Last updated
2018-02-13
Results first posted
2014-08-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySocial CooperationDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
The outcome measure involved difference scores in the number of balls tossed to Player 1 between two conditions of the task. Across both conditions, the participant (always assigned as "Player 2") played with 3 other on-line players in real time. In Condition 1, Player 1 was programmed to toss on average 70% of his balls to the participant. In Condition 2, Player 1's behavior switched such that he was programmed to toss on average only 10% of his balls to the participant. The data reported below is the number of balls tossed to Player 1 in Condition 2 minus balls tossed under Condition 1.
PrimaryDisengagement From Social Threat CuesDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
The outcome measure involved difference scores in response latencies on disengagement trials for disgust versus neutral cues. Difference scores were calculated as response latencies during disengagement trials for disgust cues minus response latencies during disengagement trials for neutral cues. Negative change scores represent an improvement in disengagement.
SecondaryPerceived Trust Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Participants will rate their perceived level of trust (on a 1-7 Likert scale) toward Player 1 during online ball-tossing task. Higher ratings on this scale reflect greater perceived trust toward Player 1.
SecondaryPerceived Empathy Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Participants will rate their level of perceived empathy (on a 1-7 Likert scale) with Player 1 during online ball-tossing task. Higher scores on this scale reflect greater perceived empathy toward Player 1.
SecondaryPerceived Preference Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)Participants will rate their level of preference (on a 1-7 Likert scale) for Player 1 during online ball-tossing task. Higher scores on this scale reflect greater preference for Player 1.
SecondaryPerceived Rejection Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Participants will rate their level of perceived rejection (on a 1-7 Likert scale) from Player 1 during online ball-tossing task. Higher scores on this scale reflect greater perceived rejection from Player 1.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSocial CooperationDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)Data from 2 participants could not be analyzed due to technical difficulties with the computer task. Thus, the number of participants analyzed was 52 in total, rather than 54.Ball tossesMEAN
PRIMARYDisengagement From Social Threat CuesDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)MillisecondsMEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Trust Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Due to technical difficulties during the computer task, two participants did not complete this questionnaire and were not included in the analysis. Thus, only 52 participants were included in this analysis.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Empathy Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Due to technical difficulties during the computer task, two participants did not complete this questionnaire and were not included in the analysis. Thus, only 52 participants were included in this analysis.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Preference Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Due to technical difficulties during the computer task, two participants did not complete this questionnaire and were not included in the analysis. Thus, only 52 participants were included in this analysis.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Rejection Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleDay 1 (first day oxytocin or placebo was administered)
Due to technical difficulties during the computer task, two participants did not complete this questionnaire and were not included in this analysis. Thus, only 52 participants were included in this analysis.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Social CooperationOxytocin4.42Standard Deviation 6.706Ball tosses
Social CooperationPlacebo4.69Standard Deviation 6.078Ball tosses
Disengagement From Social Threat CuesOxytocin1.34Standard Deviation 36.79Milliseconds
Disengagement From Social Threat CuesPlacebo-2.69Standard Deviation 52.39Milliseconds
Perceived Trust Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleOxytocin4.65Standard Deviation 1.47units on a scale
Perceived Trust Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScalePlacebo4.73Standard Deviation 1.12units on a scale
Perceived Empathy Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleOxytocin4.46Standard Deviation 1.39units on a scale
Perceived Empathy Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScalePlacebo4.27Standard Deviation 1.46units on a scale
Perceived Preference Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScaleOxytocin5.04Standard Deviation 1.40units on a scale
Perceived Preference Scores on a 1-7 Likert ScalePlacebo5.04Standard Deviation 1.18units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOxytocin27
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo27
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOxytocin27
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo27
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOxytocin0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherJitteriness/restlessnessNervous system disordersOxytocin427
otherJitteriness/restlessnessNervous system disordersPlacebo527
otherAnxietyNervous system disordersOxytocin327
otherAnxietyNervous system disordersPlacebo327
otherDry mouthNervous system disordersOxytocin227
otherDry mouthNervous system disordersPlacebo227

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOxytocin
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsOxytocin727
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo927
Total, serious adverse eventsOxytocin027
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo027

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
28559206DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Oxytocin vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01856530

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01856530/registered