ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01890109

Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes

NCT01890109, Phase 1, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2019-01-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes. Trials, record NCT01890109. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01890109

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes
NCT number
NCT01890109
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Enrollment
103 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Vasomotor Symptoms; Hot Flashes
Interventions
Erenumab, Placebo
First posted
2013-07-01
Last updated
2019-01-14
Results first posted
2019-01-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRatio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot FlashesBaseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)
The severity of hot flashes was assessed by participants based on the following categories: * Mild: sensation of heat without sweating, mild flushing; * Moderate: sensation of heat, face flushed, slightly clammy, some sweating, able to continue activity, may want to remove layers of clothing or covers at night; * Severe: sensation of heat with more severe sweating, have to stop current activity, may have to change clothing. Baseline (BL) number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day -7 to day 1 predose based on geometric mean, and the week 4 number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day 21 to day 27 based on geometric mean. The ratio of week 4 to BL was used to assess change from BL to week 4 via a log transformation (log\[week4/BL\] = log\[week4\] - log\[BL\]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
SecondaryRatio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity ScoreBaseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)
The daily severity score was calculated according to the following: (Number of mild hot flashes \* 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes \* 2) + (number of severe hot flashes \* 3). The baseline daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day -7 to day 1 predose, and the week 4 daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day 21 to day 27. The ratio of week 4 to baseline (week 4 / baseline) was used to assess change from baseline to week 4 via a log transformation (log\[week4/BL\] = log\[week4\] - log\[baseline\]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events16 weeks
A treatment-emergent adverse event is any adverse event that began or worsened after the initial dose of study drug and before the end of study. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * fatal * life threatening * required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect. * other medically important serious event A treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) is any treatment-emergent adverse event that per investigator review had a reasonable possibility of being caused by the study drug.
SecondaryMaximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab After a Single DosePredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-doseBlood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated analytical procedure.
SecondaryTime to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Erunumab After a Single DosePredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
SecondaryArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for ErenumabPredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
SecondaryArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for ErenumabPredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
SecondaryTerminal Half-life (T1/2) of ErenumabPredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation16 weeks
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidal ideation during the study based on the following Yes/No questions: 1. Have you wished you were dead or wished you could go to sleep and not wake up? 2. Have you actually had any thoughts of killing yourself?
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies After a Single Dose16 weeks
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to detect antibodies capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. A participant was defined as positive for developing anti-erenumab antibodies if they were binding antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRatio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot FlashesBaseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)All participants for whom at least 1 postdose hot flash response measure was recorded.ratioNUMBER
SECONDARYRatio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity ScoreBaseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)All participants for whom at least 1 postdose hot flash response measure was recorded.ratioNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events16 weeksAll participants who received study drugParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMaximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab After a Single DosePredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-doseAll participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated.μg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Erunumab After a Single DosePredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-doseAll participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for ErenumabPredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-doseAll participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated.day*μg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYArea Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for ErenumabPredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated. AUCinf could not be accurately estimated for 23 participants who are excluded from the analysis.
day*μg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYTerminal Half-life (T1/2) of ErenumabPredose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 PK parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated. T1/2 could not be accurately estimated for 23 participants who are excluded from the analysis. The terminal half-life calculated from this single dose study may not be representative of a clinically relevant half-life of erenumab.
daysMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation16 weeksAll participants who received study drugParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies After a Single Dose16 weeksAll participants who received study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group35

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot FlashesPlacebo0.3595% Confidence Interval 0.24 to 0.50ratio
Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot FlashesErenumab0.3895% Confidence Interval 0.26 to 0.55ratio
Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity ScorePlacebo0.4095% Confidence Interval 0.29 to 0.53ratio
Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity ScoreErenumab0.4595% Confidence Interval 0.33 to 0.61ratio
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPlaceboTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)23Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsErenumabTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)24Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPlaceboSerious adverse events0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsErenumabSerious adverse events0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsPlaceboTEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsErenumabTEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug0Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo52
Overall StudySTARTEDErenumab51
Overall StudyReceived Study TreatmentPlacebo52
Overall StudyReceived Study TreatmentErenumab50
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDErenumab46
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDErenumab5

Adverse events12

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo252
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsErenumab 70 mg350
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo352
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsErenumab 70 mg050
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo052
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersErenumab 70 mg450
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo052
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersErenumab 70 mg350
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo452
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersErenumab 70 mg350

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityErenumab 70 mg
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1152
Total, other adverse eventsErenumab 70 mg950
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo052
Total, serious adverse eventsErenumab 70 mg050

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Erenumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal IdeationTrial comparisons
Erenumab 70 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01890109

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01890109/results?page=2