ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01896232

Head-to-Head Study of Etelcalcetide (AMG 416) and Cinacalcet

NCT01896232, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2017-02-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Head-to-Head Study of Etelcalcetide (AMG 416) and Cinacalcet. Trials, record NCT01896232. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01896232

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Head-to-Head Study of Etelcalcetide (AMG 416) and Cinacalcet
NCT number
NCT01896232
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
683 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Chronic Kidney Disease
Interventions
Etelcalcetide, Cinacalcet, Oral Placebo, Intravenous Placebo
First posted
2013-07-11
Last updated
2019-07-18
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-000192-33
Results first posted
2017-02-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase - Non-inferiority AnalysisBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (EAP; defined as Weeks 20 to 27, inclusive).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With > 50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Weeks 20 to 27, inclusive).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)
SecondaryMean Number of Days of Vomiting or Nausea Per Week in the First 8 WeeksFirst 8 weeks
Participants completed the Nausea/Vomiting Symptom Assessment (NVSA) questionnaire daily. This questionnaire asked participants to indicate the severity of nausea on a scale from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (as severe as can be imagined) and if they had vomited in the past 24 hours. A day of vomiting or nausea was defined as those where the severity of nausea score was \> 0 or where the episodes of vomiting score was \> 0.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (weeks 20 - 27)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Mean Predialysis Serum Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEfficacy assessment phase (weeks 20 - 27)
SecondaryMean Severity of Nausea in the First 8 WeeksFirst 8 weeks
Severity of nausea was assessed using the Nausea and Vomiting Symptom Assessment questionnaire which asked participants to rate the severity of nausea on a scale from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (as severe as can be imagined). For each participant, the mean severity of nausea was calculated by averaging all available daily severities (including zeroes) reported in the first 8 weeks.
SecondaryMean Number of Episodes of Vomiting Per Week in the First 8 WeeksFirst 8 weeks
The number of vomiting episodes was assessed using the Nausea and Vomiting Symptom Assessment questionnaire which asks participants on a daily basis how many times they vomited in the past 24 hours. The number of episodes in a week is the sum of all reported daily episodes in the week. For participants providing less than 7 days of responses to NVSA questions in any given week, data from that week did not contribute to the analysis.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase - Non-inferiority AnalysisBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (EAP; defined as Weeks 20 to 27, inclusive).Full analysis set participants with PTH data during the EAPpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With > 50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Weeks 20 to 27, inclusive).Full analysis set; participants were considered non-responders if they did not have PTH data during the EAP (ie, non-responder imputation).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)Full analysis set; participants were considered non-responders if they did not have PTH data during the EAP (ie, non-responder imputation).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Number of Days of Vomiting or Nausea Per Week in the First 8 WeeksFirst 8 weeksFull analysis set with available data. For participants providing less than 7 days of responses to NVSA questions in any given week, data from that week did not contribute to the analysis.days of vomiting or nausea per weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (weeks 20 - 27)Full analysis set with available data.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Mean Predialysis Serum Phosphorus ≤ 4.5 mg/dL During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEfficacy assessment phase (weeks 20 - 27)Full analysis set; participants with no phosphorus assessments during the EAP were considered non-responders.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Severity of Nausea in the First 8 WeeksFirst 8 weeksFull analysis set with available dataunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Number of Episodes of Vomiting Per Week in the First 8 WeeksFirst 8 weeksFull analysis set with available data. For participants providing less than 7 days of responses to NVSA questions in any given week, data from that week did not contribute to the analysis.vomiting episodes per weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase - Non-inferiority AnalysisCinacalcet63.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Phase - Non-inferiority AnalysisEtelcalcetide77.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With > 50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseCinacalcet40.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With > 50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEtelcalcetide52.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseCinacalcet57.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With > 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEtelcalcetide68.2percentage of participants
Mean Number of Days of Vomiting or Nausea Per Week in the First 8 WeeksCinacalcet0.3Standard Error 0.03days of vomiting or nausea per week
Mean Number of Days of Vomiting or Nausea Per Week in the First 8 WeeksEtelcalcetide0.4Standard Error 0.04days of vomiting or nausea per week
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseCinacalcet-6.28Standard Error 0.44percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseEtelcalcetide-9.83Standard Error 0.49percent change

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCinacalcet343
Overall StudySTARTEDEtelcalcetide340
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentCinacalcet341
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentEtelcalcetide338
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCinacalcet294
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEtelcalcetide287
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCinacalcet49
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEtelcalcetide53

Adverse events410

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCinacalcet11341
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtelcalcetide17338
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet34341
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEtelcalcetide21338
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet77341
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEtelcalcetide62338
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet46341
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersEtelcalcetide44338
otherBlood calcium decreasedInvestigationsCinacalcet203341
otherBlood calcium decreasedInvestigationsEtelcalcetide232338

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCinacalcet
Total, all-cause mortalityEtelcalcetide
Total, other adverse eventsCinacalcet259341
Total, other adverse eventsEtelcalcetide278338
Total, serious adverse eventsCinacalcet93341
Total, serious adverse eventsEtelcalcetide85338

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28097356BACKGROUNDPubMed
28803497BACKGROUNDPubMed
29392552BACKGROUNDPubMed
29534286BACKGROUNDPubMed
30875390BACKGROUNDPubMed
32082556BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Cinacalcet vs Etelcalcetide: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01896232

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01896232/events?page=2