ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01898494

Transoral Surgery Followed By Low-Dose or Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With HPV Positive Stage III-IVA Oropharyngeal Cancer

NCT01898494, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group; results first posted 2022-09-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Transoral Surgery Followed By Low-Dose or Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With HPV Positive Stage III-IVA Oropharyngeal Cancer. Trials, record NCT01898494. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01898494

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Transoral Surgery Followed By Low-Dose or Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With HPV Positive Stage III-IVA Oropharyngeal Cancer
NCT number
NCT01898494
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
519 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Conditions
Human Papilloma Virus Infection, Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx, Stage IVA Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx, Stage IVB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx
Interventions
Transoral surgery, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, cisplatin, carboplatin
First posted
2013-07-12
Last updated
2026-04-01
Results first posted
2022-09-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsAssessed every 3 months for 2 years
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization/assignment of post-surgical treatment to the appearance of lesions, including primary, nodal or new site, or death, whichever occurs first. These patients are considered disease-free after surgery so the appearance of any lesions is counted as progression. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to characterize progression-free survival rate at 2 years.
PrimaryProportion of Patients With Grade III or IV Oropharyngeal Bleeding or Positive MarginsAssessed during surgery and directly after surgery
Surgery quality was evaluated based on grade 3-4 bleeding events per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 during surgery and positive margins after surgery. Per CTCAE v5.0, grade 3 = severe and grade 4 = life-threatening. Having grade 3-4 bleeding or positive margins indicates worse outcomes.
SecondaryDistribution of Histologic Risk StatusAssessed after directly surgery
Low Risk: T1-T2, N0-N1 AND clear (\> 3mm) margins, AND no extranodal extension (ENE) or PNI/LVI. Intermediate Risk: Any of the following features: one or more "close" (\< 3mm) margin(s), OR "Minimal" (\< 1mm) ENE, OR N2a (1 or more lymph node \>3cm in diameter), OR N2b (2-4 lymph nodes positive, any diameter \< 6cm), OR with perineural invastion or lymphovascular invasion. High Risk: Any of the following features: one or more positive margin(s) with any T stage, OR "Extensive" (\> 1mm) ENE, OR \> 5 metastatic lymph nodes (regardless of primary tumor margin status).
SecondarySwallowing Function Before Surgery Assessed Using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Assessed at baseline
The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20-item written questionnaire. It evaluates the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. This instrument has been psychometrically validated in head and neck cancer patients. Two summary scores can be obtained from the MDADI: 1) global and 2) composite. The global scale is a single question, scored individually, to assess the overall impact that swallowing abilities have on quality of life ("my swallowing impacts my day-to-day life"). The composite MDADI score summarizes overall performance on remaining 19-items of the MDADI, as a weighted average of the physical, emotional, and functional subscale questions. This study reports the composite MDADI score. The summary MDADI scores are normalized to range from 20 (extremely low functioning) to 100 (high functioning).
SecondarySwallowing Function After Surgery Assessed Using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Assessed 4-6 weeks after surgery
The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20-item written questionnaire. It evaluates the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. This instrument has been psychometrically validated in head and neck cancer patients. Two summary scores can be obtained from the MDADI: 1) global and 2) composite. The global scale is a single question, scored individually, to assess the overall impact that swallowing abilities have on quality of life ("my swallowing impacts my day-to-day life"). The composite MDADI score summarizes overall performance on remaining 19-items of the MDADI, as a weighted average of the physical, emotional, and functional subscale questions. This study reports the composite MDADI score. The summary MDADI scores are normalized to range from 20 (extremely low functioning) to 100 (high functioning).
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) at 6 Months After Treatment Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-HN) Total ScoreAssessed at 6 months after treatment
The FACT-H\&N (version 4) consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H\&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. FACT-HN total score ranges between 0 and 148. The higher the score, the better the QOL.
OtherAssociation Between TP53 Mutation and Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months, up to 5 years
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration to the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression or death, whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to characterize progression-free survival.
OtherAssociation Between Radiation Resistance Markers and Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 year, then every 6 months, up to 5 years
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration to the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression or death, whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to characterize progression-free survival.
OtherUsefulness of Biomarkers in Predicting Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months, up to 5 years
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration to the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression or death, whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to characterize progression-free survival.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsAssessed every 3 months for 2 yearsEligible and treated patientsproportion of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYProportion of Patients With Grade III or IV Oropharyngeal Bleeding or Positive MarginsAssessed during surgery and directly after surgeryPatients who received surgeryproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDistribution of Histologic Risk StatusAssessed after directly surgeryPatients who received surgeryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYSwallowing Function Before Surgery Assessed Using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Assessed at baselineEligible and treated patients with baseline MDADI scores availablescore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSwallowing Function After Surgery Assessed Using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Assessed 4-6 weeks after surgeryEligible and treated patients with MDADI scores after surgery availablescore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QOL) at 6 Months After Treatment Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-HN) Total ScoreAssessed at 6 months after treatmentEligible and treated patients with FACT-HN total scores 6 months after treatment availablescore on a scaleMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDAssociation Between TP53 Mutation and Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months, up to 5 years
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDAssociation Between Radiation Resistance Markers and Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 year, then every 6 months, up to 5 years
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDUsefulness of Biomarkers in Predicting Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months, up to 5 years

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsArm S (Surgery) Then Arm A (Low Risk, Observation)0.96990% Confidence Interval 0.919 to 1.00proportion of participants
Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsArm S (Surgery) Then Arm B (Intermediate Risk, Low-dose IMRT)0.94990% Confidence Interval 0.913 to 0.986proportion of participants
Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsArm S (Surgery) Then Arm C (Intermediate Risk, Standard-dose IMRT)0.9690% Confidence Interval 0.928 to 0.993proportion of participants
Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsArm S (Surgery) Then Arm D (High Risk, IMRT, Chemotherapy)0.90790% Confidence Interval 0.862 to 0.954proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients With Grade III or IV Oropharyngeal Bleeding or Positive MarginsArm S (Surgery)0.09190% Confidence Interval 0.071 to 0.115proportion of participants
Distribution of Histologic Risk StatusArm S (Surgery)Low Risk38Participants
Distribution of Histologic Risk StatusArm S (Surgery)Intermediate Risk208Participants
Distribution of Histologic Risk StatusArm S (Surgery)High Risk113Participants
Swallowing Function Before Surgery Assessed Using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Arm S (Surgery) Then Arm A (Low Risk, Observation)89.195% Confidence Interval 84.7 to 93.5score on a scale
Swallowing Function Before Surgery Assessed Using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Arm S (Surgery) Then Arm B (Intermediate Risk, Low-dose IMRT)90.295% Confidence Interval 87.8 to 92.5score on a scale

Participant flow55

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)STARTEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm A (Observation)49
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)STARTEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm B (Radiotherapy IMRT 50 Gy)126
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)STARTEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm C (Radiotherapy IMRT 60 Gy)132
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)STARTEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm D (Chemo + IMRT 66 Gy)138
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)STARTEDNot Being Assigned to Step 2 Adjuvant Treatment Arms74
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)COMPLETEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm A (Observation)49
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)COMPLETEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm B (Radiotherapy IMRT 50 Gy)126
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)COMPLETEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm C (Radiotherapy IMRT 60 Gy)132
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)COMPLETEDArm S (Transoral Surgery) Then Arm D (Chemo + IMRT 66 Gy)138
Step 1 (Arm S - Transoral Surgery)COMPLETEDNot Being Assigned to Step 2 Adjuvant Treatment Arms50

Adverse events515

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm S (Transoral Surgery)0495
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A (Observation)049
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B (Radiotherapy IMRT 50 Gy)0120
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm C (Radiotherapy IMRT 60 Gy)1127
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm D (Cisplatin + IMRT 66 Gy)9134
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm S (Transoral Surgery)0495
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm A (Observation)049
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm B (Radiotherapy IMRT 50 Gy)3120
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm C (Radiotherapy IMRT 60 Gy)17127
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm D (Cisplatin + IMRT 66 Gy)31134

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm S (Transoral Surgery)24519
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A (Observation)149
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B (Radiotherapy IMRT 50 Gy)4126
Total, all-cause mortalityArm C (Radiotherapy IMRT 60 Gy)7132
Total, all-cause mortalityArm D (Cisplatin + IMRT 66 Gy)9138
Total, other adverse eventsArm S (Transoral Surgery)110495
Total, other adverse eventsArm A (Observation)149
Total, other adverse eventsArm B (Radiotherapy IMRT 50 Gy)57120
Total, other adverse eventsArm C (Radiotherapy IMRT 60 Gy)71127
Total, other adverse eventsArm D (Cisplatin + IMRT 66 Gy)96134

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34699271RESULTPubMed
40493877DERIVEDPubMed

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10CA180820ECOG-ACRIN Network Group Operations CenterODwyer, Peter J; SCHNALL, MITCHELL D.ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2026NIH RePORTER
U10CA021115Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Operations OfficeCOMIS, ROBERT LFRONTIER SCI & TECHNOLOGY RSCH FDN, INCNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01898494

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01898494/flow?page=2