ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01907269

A Direct-to-patient Intervention to Increase Rates of Osteoporosis Care

NCT01907269, Not applicable, Completed, University of Alabama at Birmingham; results first posted 2018-06-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Direct-to-patient Intervention to Increase Rates of Osteoporosis Care. Trials, record NCT01907269. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01907269

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Direct-to-patient Intervention to Increase Rates of Osteoporosis Care
NCT number
NCT01907269
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
2,684 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Conditions
Osteoporosis
Interventions
Video-based Intervention
First posted
2013-07-24
Last updated
2018-06-26
Results first posted
2018-06-26
Limitations and caveats
Low rates of osteoporosis treatment initiation; Self-reported fracture history subject to recall bias; Low % of participants reported fracture in 12-months prior to intervention; Low % of participants who interacted with intervention appreciably

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription Medication6 months post-intervention
We will assess the number of participants that self-report the initiation of an osteoporosis prescription medication. It will be assessed using a self-completed survey. Osteoporosis prescription medications that will be assessed include: alendronate, calcitonin, denosumab ibandronate, raloxifene, risedronate, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid. We will not include initiation of estrogen hormone therapies as part of the primary outcome.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin D6 and 18 months post-intervention
We will assess the use of calcium and vitamin D by participant. This will be assessed on a self-completed survey. Participants will be asked if they are currently taking a calcium supplement and/or vitamin D supplement.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Receipt of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Testing6 and 18 months post-interventionSelf-report of a receipt of a DXA scan (Bone Mineral Density test).
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription Medication18 months
We will assess the number of participants that self-report the initiation of an osteoporosis prescription medication. It will be assessed using a self-completed survey. Osteoporosis prescription medications that will be assessed include: alendronate, calcitonin, denosumab ibandronate, raloxifene, risedronate, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid. We will not include initiation of estrogen hormone therapies as part of the outcome.
OtherNumber of Participants Who Reported Communicating With a Health Care Provider About Osteoporosis Care6 and 18 months post-intervention

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription Medication6 months post-interventionFor the Intent-to-Treat Analysis the data was imputed for non-responders.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin D6 and 18 months post-interventionFor the Intent-to-Treat Analysis the data was imputed for non-responders.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Reported Receipt of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Testing6 and 18 months post-intervention
For the Intent-to-Treat Analysis the data was imputed for non-responders. Surveys for BMD (18 months) included 3 responses. If participants marked option (2) that they had received a BMD, but \> 12 months ago they were excluded from analyses. Thus our overall population analyzed (those marking response 1 or 3) is different than our participant flow.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription Medication18 monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants Who Reported Communicating With a Health Care Provider About Osteoporosis Care6 and 18 months post-interventionFor the Intent-to-Treat Analysis the data was imputed for non-responders.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription MedicationVideo-based Intervention157Participants
Number of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription MedicationUsual Care153Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DVideo-based InterventionVitamin D (6 months)554Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DUsual CareVitamin D (6 months)562Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DVideo-based InterventionCalcium (6 months)427Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DUsual CareCalcium (6 months)437Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DVideo-based InterventionVitamin D (18 months)475Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DUsual CareVitamin D (18 months)572Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DVideo-based InterventionCalcium (18 months)249Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Use of Calcium and Vitamin DUsual CareCalcium (18 months)310Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
6 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventiSTARTEDVideo-based Intervention1,342
6 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventiSTARTEDUsual Care1,342
6 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventiCOMPLETEDVideo-based Intervention953
6 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventiCOMPLETEDUsual Care1,053
6 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventiNOT COMPLETEDVideo-based Intervention389
6 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventiNOT COMPLETEDUsual Care289
18 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventSTARTEDVideo-based Intervention1,178
18 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventSTARTEDUsual Care1,250
18 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventCOMPLETEDVideo-based Intervention859
18 Month Outcome Measures Post-interventCOMPLETEDUsual Care970

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVideo-based Intervention00
Total, all-cause mortalityUsual Care00
Total, other adverse eventsVideo-based Intervention00
Total, other adverse eventsUsual Care00
Total, serious adverse eventsVideo-based Intervention00
Total, serious adverse eventsUsual Care00

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
3049068BACKGROUNDPubMed
18787907BACKGROUNDPubMed
27453960RESULTPubMed
29377378RESULTPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01AR060240Activating Patients to Reduce Osteoporosis (APROPOS)SAAG, KENNETH GUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES2011 to 2015

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Video-based Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription MedicationTrial comparisons
Video-based Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Participants That Initiate an Osteoporosis Prescription MedicationTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01907269

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01907269/registered