ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01918033

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese Participants With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (MK-4117-200)

NCT01918033, Phase 3, Completed, Organon and Co; results first posted 2014-08-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese Participants With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (MK-4117-200). Trials, record NCT01918033. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01918033

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese Participants With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (MK-4117-200)
NCT number
NCT01918033
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
608 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Conditions
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
Desloratadine 5 mg, Placebo
First posted
2013-08-07
Last updated
2024-06-18
Results first posted
2014-08-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2Baseline and Week 2
The investigator interviewed and examined participants to evaluate for nasal symptoms of: sneezing (daily frequency of attacks; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), rhinorrhea (daily frequency of blowing nose; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), nasal congestion (score of 0=less than nasal blockage without oral breathing to 3=severe nasal blockage causing prolonged oral breathing in a day), and nasal itching (score of 0=none to 3=nose is itchy, requiring frequent rubbing or blowing nose). The TNSS is the sum of the 4 nasal symptom sub-scores. TNSS scores could range from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.
PrimaryNumber of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)Up to Week 4
An AE is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study drug or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug, is also an AE. The number of participants who experienced an AE, regardless of causality or severity, was summarized.
PrimaryNumber of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AEUp to Week 2
An AE is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study drug or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug, is also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study drug, whether permanently or temporarily, due to an AE was summarized.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Day 3 and Week 1Baseline and Day 3, Week 1
The investigator interviewed and examined participants to evaluate for nasal symptoms of: sneezing (daily frequency of attacks; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), rhinorrhea (daily frequency of blowing nose; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), nasal congestion (score of 0=less than nasal blockage without oral breathing to 3=severe nasal blockage causing prolonged oral breathing in a day), and nasal itching (score of 0=none to 3=nose is itchy, requiring frequent rubbing or blowing nose). The TNSS is the sum of the 4 nasal symptom sub-scores. TNSS scores could range from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Symptom Sub-Scores Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
The investigator interviewed and examined participants to evaluate for nasal symptoms of: sneezing (daily frequency of attackes; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), rhinorrhea (daily frequency of blowing nose; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), nasal congestion (score of 0=less than nasal blockage without oral breathing to 3=severe nasal blockage causing prolonged oral breathing in a day), and nasal itching (score of 0=none to 3=nose is itchy, requiring frequent rubbing or blowing nose). Nasal symptom sub-scores could range from 0 to 3, with a higher nasal symptom sub-score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Finding Score Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
The investigator conducted rhinoscopic examinations on participants to evaluate: swelling of inferior nasal concha mucosa (INCM) (score of 0=none to 3=middle nasal concha is not visible), coloring of inferior nasal concha mucosa (INCM) (score of 0=normal to 3=pale), and nasal discharge production (NDP) (score of 0=none to 3=congesting). The score for each nasal finding component could range from 0 to 3, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Eye Symptom Score Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
The investigator interviewed and examined participants for eye (itching) symptoms (score of 0=none to 3=eye is itchy, requiring frequent rubbing of eye). Eye symptom scores could range from 0 to 3, with a higher score indicating greater eye itchiness.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Moderate-to-Remarkable Improvement in Global Improvement Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 3, Week 1, Week 2
The investigator comprehensively evaluated participants on global improvement according to 5 grades: 1=remarkably improved, 2= moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=unchanged, and 5=aggravated. The number of participants who were evaluated as remarkably improved and moderately improved was calculated.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Score on Interference With Daily Activities Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
The investigator interviewed participants at Baseline, Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2 to evaluate interference with daily activities according to the following scale: 0=none, 1=nasal symptom interferes with daily activities from time to time (+), 2=between 1 and 3 (++), and 3=nasal symtom interferes with daily activity often (+++). Interference with daily activities scores could range from 0 to 3, with a higher score indicating greater interference with daily activities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Symptom Sub-Scores Reported in Participant DiariesBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
Participants evaluated themselves in their daily allergy diaries for nasal symptoms of: sneezing (daily frequency of attacks; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), rhinorrhea (daily frequency of blowing nose; score of 0=less than 1 time to 3=11+ times), nasal congestion (score of 0=less than nasal blockage without oral breathing to 3=severe nasal blockage causing prolonged oral breathing in a day), and nasal itching (score of 0=none to 3=nose is itchy, requiring frequent rubbing or blowing nose). Each nasal symptom sub-score could range from 0 to 3, with a higher sub-score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2Baseline and Week 2The Full Analysis Set (FAS) population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for TNSS.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)Up to Week 4The All-Subjects-as-Treated (ASaT) population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AEUp to Week 2The ASaT population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Day 3 and Week 1Baseline and Day 3, Week 1The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for TNSS.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Nasal Symptom Sub-Scores Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for nasal symptom sub-scores as assessed by the investigator.
Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Nasal Finding Score Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for nasal finding score.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Eye Symptom Score Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2
The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for eye symptom score as assessed by the investigator.
Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Moderate-to-Remarkable Improvement in Global Improvement Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 3, Week 1, Week 2The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for global improvement.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Score on Interference With Daily Activities Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for interference with daily activities.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Nasal Symptom Sub-Scores Reported in Participant DiariesBaseline and Day 3, Week 1, Week 2The FAS population consisted of all participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline or at least one post-baseline assessment for participant-rated nasal symptom score.Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group150

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2Desloratadine 5 mg-1.9695% Confidence Interval 2.21Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2Desloratadine 10 mg-1.9495% Confidence Interval 2.21Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Week 2Placebo-1.8795% Confidence Interval 2.34Score on a Scale
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)Desloratadine 5 mg27Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)Desloratadine 10 mg29Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)Placebo20Participants
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AEDesloratadine 5 mg1Participants
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AEDesloratadine 10 mg0Participants
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to an AEPlacebo2Participants
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Assessed by the Investigator at Day 3 and Week 1Desloratadine 5 mgChange from Baseline (BL) at Day 3-1.1295% Confidence Interval 2.05Score on a Scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDesloratadine 5 mg203
Overall StudySTARTEDDesloratadine 10 mg203
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo202
Overall StudyTreatedDesloratadine 5 mg202
Overall StudyTreatedDesloratadine 10 mg203
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo201
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDesloratadine 5 mg198
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDesloratadine 10 mg201
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo199
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDesloratadine 5 mg5

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasphopharyngitisInfections and infestationsDesloratadine 5 mg1120212
otherNasphopharyngitisInfections and infestationsDesloratadine 10 mg1720317
otherNasphopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo920110
seriousEpilepsyNervous system disordersDesloratadine 5 mg12021
seriousEpilepsyNervous system disordersDesloratadine 10 mg02030
seriousEpilepsyNervous system disordersPlacebo02010

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDesloratadine 5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityDesloratadine 10 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsDesloratadine 5 mg11202
Total, other adverse eventsDesloratadine 10 mg17203
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo9201
Total, serious adverse eventsDesloratadine 5 mg1202
Total, serious adverse eventsDesloratadine 10 mg0203
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0201

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01918033

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01918033/results?page=2