ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01919996

PASS Study To Evaluate The Potential Of Zithromax To Cause Ocular Problems In Pediatric Patients

NCT01919996, Phase 2, Terminated, Pfizer; results first posted 2016-07-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. PASS Study To Evaluate The Potential Of Zithromax To Cause Ocular Problems In Pediatric Patients. Trials, record NCT01919996. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01919996

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
PASS Study To Evaluate The Potential Of Zithromax To Cause Ocular Problems In Pediatric Patients
NCT number
NCT01919996
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
8 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
Interventions
Azithromycin
First posted
2013-08-09
Last updated
2016-08-05
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-001119-19
Results first posted
2016-07-06
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated after the FDA released the Sponsor from the PMC. The FDA deemed the study as impracticable, given the azithromycin dose studied in the PMC was not used and the available data did not identify a signal for ocular toxicity.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOccurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations14 days
Clinically significant worsening is an observed worsening in any of the five ophthalmic exams: 1) Clinically significant worsening in best corrected visual activity (BCVA) (distance) at the final visit, in either eye, is defined as a decrease in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA. 2) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in color vision Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test (FM-100) in either eye. 3) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.
SecondaryOccurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations14 days
1 or more of these conditions are clinically significant improvement based on five ophthalmic exams:1) clinically significant improvement in BCVA(distance) at the final visit, in either eye, defined as an increase in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in ETDRS BCVA.2) Assessment of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal or abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in color vision(FM-100) in either eye. 3) Assessment of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5)Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, nonclinically significant at final visit in dilated ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.
SecondaryOccurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations14 days
Clinically significant change (improvement or worsening) is based on five ophthalmic exams at baseline and the final visit. Any 1 or more of these conditions are a clinically significant change: 1) A worsening in BCVA (distance), as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in BCVA (distance) as defined in outcome measure 2. 2) A worsening in color vision (FM-100), as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in color vision (FM-100) as defined in outcome measure 2. 3) A worsening in Amsler Grid, as defined in outcome measure 1, OR an improvement in Amsler Grid, as defined in outcome measure 2. 4) A worsening in anterior segment biomicroscopy, as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in anterior segment biomicroscopy as defined in outcome measure 2. 5) A worsening in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy, as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy as defined in outcome measure 2.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOccurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations14 days
The safety population included all enrolled participants that took at least one dose of study medication. One participant was not evaluable because visual acuity was not corrected at Baseline (Day 1) and was corrected at Final Visit (Day 14).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOccurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations14 days
The safety population included all enrolled participants that took at least one dose of study medication. One participant was not evaluable because visual acuity was not corrected at Baseline (Day 1) and was corrected at Final Visit (Day 14).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOccurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations14 days
The safety population included all enrolled participants that took at least one dose of study medication. One participant was not evaluable because visual acuity was not corrected at Baseline (Day 1) and was corrected at Final Visit (Day 14).
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinClinically significant worsening - Yes0.0percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinClinically significant worsening - No87.5percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinNot Evaluable12.5percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinClinically Significant Improvement - Yes12.5percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinClinically Significant Improvement - No75.0percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinNot Evaluable12.5percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinSignificant Change (Improvement or Worsening) -Yes12.5percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinSignificant Change (Improvement or Worsening) - No75.0percentage of participants
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic ExaminationsAzithromycinNot Evaluable12.5percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAzithromycin8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAzithromycin8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAzithromycin0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAzithromycin
Total, other adverse eventsAzithromycin08
Total, serious adverse eventsAzithromycin08

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01919996

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01919996/registered