ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01922102

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 vs Verteporfin PDT in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia

NCT01922102, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2019-06-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 vs Verteporfin PDT in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia. Trials, record NCT01922102. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01922102

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 vs Verteporfin PDT in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia
NCT number
NCT01922102
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
457 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Pathologic Myopia (PM)
Interventions
Ranibizumab 0.5mg, Ranibizumab 0.5 mg, Verteporfin PDT
First posted
2013-08-14
Last updated
2019-06-24
Results first posted
2019-06-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3From Baseline to Month 3
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) charts testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.
SecondaryChange From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6From Baseline to Month 6
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF. Between treatment comparison of 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by disease activity re-treatment criteria (Group II) versus 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by visual acuity stability criteria (Group I) based on the average BCVA change from Baseline to Month 1 through Month 6.
SecondaryThe Average Change in BCVA Score From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12From Baseline to Month 12
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the ETDRS VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF. Between treatment comparison of 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by disease activity re-treatment criteria (Group II) versus 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by visual acuity stability criteria (Group I) based on the average BCVA change from Baseline to Month 1 through Month 12
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity Over TimeChange from baseline at months 3, 6, and 12
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the ETDRS VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.
SecondaryCategorized BCVA Changes at Months 3, 6 and 12 Compared With Baseline for the Study EyeFrom Baseline to Month 12
ETDRS VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline Over Time in Central Sub-field Thickness (CSFT)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12
Central sub-field thickness (CSFT) is a variable assessed via Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT was performed prior to any study drug administration to assess presence of intra, subretinal fluid, or increase of CSFT.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With CNV Leakage (Center Involvement) in the Study Eye at Baseline and Month 12From Baseline until Month 12CNV leakage is assessed via fluorescein angiography (center involvement) category: definite, questionable, absent, can't grade, and missing.
SecondaryNEI-VFQ-25 - Change From Baseline to Month 3, 6 and 12Change from baseline at month 3, 6 and 12
The VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision related questions across 11 vision related subscales, including general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision and peripheral vision, and a general health rating. Items are converted to a 0-100 scale on each subscale and for the composite score where higher scores represents better functioning.
SecondaryNumber of Ranibizumab Injections Received in the Study Eye for the Ranibizumab GroupsFrom Baseline to Month 12To assess treatment pattern with ranibizumab

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3From Baseline to Month 3
Full Analysis Set (FAS): consisted of all patients to whom study treatment were assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they were assigned to at randomization.
ETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6From Baseline to Month 6
Full Analysis Set (FAS): Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they were assigned to at randomization.~FAS, modified last observation carried forward (LOCF), for comparison between ranibizumab treatment groups.): consisted of all patients to whom study treatment were assigned.
ETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Change in BCVA Score From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12From Baseline to Month 12FAS, modified LOCF for comparison between ranibizumab treatment groups.ETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity Over TimeChange from baseline at months 3, 6, and 12FASETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYCategorized BCVA Changes at Months 3, 6 and 12 Compared With Baseline for the Study EyeFrom Baseline to Month 12FASParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline Over Time in Central Sub-field Thickness (CSFT)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With CNV Leakage (Center Involvement) in the Study Eye at Baseline and Month 12From Baseline until Month 12FASParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNEI-VFQ-25 - Change From Baseline to Month 3, 6 and 12Change from baseline at month 3, 6 and 12FASComposite scoreMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Ranibizumab Injections Received in the Study Eye for the Ranibizumab GroupsFrom Baseline to Month 12
Safety Set: all patients who received at least one application of study treatment \& had at least one post-Baseline safety assessment. Patients were analyzed according to treatment received. One patient randomized to vPDT Group III received one ranibizumab injection prior to Month 3; this patient was analyzed under Group II in Safety Set
InjectionsMEAN

Results by group101

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3Group IBaseline53.7Standard Deviation 12.65ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3Group IIBaseline54.2Standard Deviation 13.01ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3Group IIIBaseline52.6Standard Deviation 12.29ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3Group IAverage Month 1 to Month 363.1Standard Deviation 12.80ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3Group IIAverage Month 1 to Month 363.9Standard Deviation 13.28ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3Group IIIAverage Month 1 to Month 357.1Standard Deviation 13.21ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6Group IBaseline53.7Standard Deviation 12.65ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6Group IIBaseline54.2Standard Deviation 13.01ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6Group IIIBaseline52.6Standard Deviation 12.29ETDRS letters
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6Group IAverage Month 1 to Month 664.1Standard Deviation 12.77ETDRS letters

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup I182
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup II184
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup III91
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup I173
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup II175
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup III83
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup I9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup II9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup III8

Adverse events756

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup I0182
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup II0185
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab175
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab114
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersGroup I1182
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersGroup II0185
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersGroup III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab075
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersGroup III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab114
otherVentricular extrasystolesCardiac disordersGroup I0182
otherVentricular extrasystolesCardiac disordersGroup II0185

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup I
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup II
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab
Total, other adverse eventsGroup I102182
Total, other adverse eventsGroup II116185
Total, other adverse eventsGroup III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab5075
Total, other adverse eventsGroup III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab814
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup I7182
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup II15185

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01922102

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01922102/results?page=2