ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01925209

Efficacy and Safety of Bimagrumab/BYM338 at 52 Weeks on Physical Function, Muscle Strength, Mobility in sIBM Patients

NCT01925209, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2017-05-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Bimagrumab/BYM338 at 52 Weeks on Physical Function, Muscle Strength, Mobility in sIBM Patients. Trials, record NCT01925209. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01925209

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Bimagrumab/BYM338 at 52 Weeks on Physical Function, Muscle Strength, Mobility in sIBM Patients
NCT number
NCT01925209
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
251 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis
Interventions
BYM338/bimagrumab, Placebo
First posted
2013-08-19
Last updated
2017-08-11
Results first posted
2017-05-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The 6MWD test measured the distance (in meters) that a participant walked in a 6 minute timeframe. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryEstimated Within Treatment Group Lean Body Mass (LBM) Ratio at Week 52Baseline, Week 52LBM was measured via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and calculated as (LBM at Week 52/LBM at baseline)\*100 . A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quadriceps Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) on the Right Side at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Quadriceps muscle strength was measured by portable fixed dynamometry (PFD) on the right side. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis (sIBM) Functional Assessment (sIFA) Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Self-reported physical function was assessed by a newly developed patient reported outcome named sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) functional assessment (sIFA). The sIFA consists of 11 items scored on an 11 point numerical rating scale from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (unable to do) across 3 domains: upper body functioning, lower body functioning and general functioning. Participants completed the assessment where the recall period was the past week prior to completing the patient reported outcome (PRO). The total score on the sIFA scale ranges from 0 (minimum) to 110 (maximum). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates deterioration.
SecondaryEstimated Annual Number of Falls Per Patient Within Treatment GroupWeek 52Participants documented any fall occurrences in a paper diary during the study.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The SPPB evaluated lower extremities function by testing gait speed, ability to keep standing balance and time to rise from a chair five times. The sub-score for each test ranged from 0 to 4. The summary score, which was a summation of scores from the 3 tests, ranged from 0 to 12. An increase in score indicates improvement in physical performance. A negative change from baseline indicates deterioration.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, was considered for the analysis. Only those participants from the FAS who had both baseline and week 52 6MWD measurements were analyzed.
metersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYEstimated Within Treatment Group Lean Body Mass (LBM) Ratio at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, was considered for the analysis. Only those participants from the FAS who had both baseline and week 52 LBM measurements were analyzed.
PercentageNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Quadriceps Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) on the Right Side at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, was considered for the analysis. Only those participants from the FAS who had both baseline and week 52 QMT measurements were analyzed.
newtonsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis (sIBM) Functional Assessment (sIFA) Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, was considered for the analysis. Only those participants from the FAS who had both baseline and week 52 sIFA measurements were analyzed.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYEstimated Annual Number of Falls Per Patient Within Treatment GroupWeek 52The Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, was analyzed.Annual number of falls per participantNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, was analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg8.63Standard Error 10.934meters
Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg9.63Standard Error 10.770meters
Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg-10.27Standard Error 10.718meters
Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test at Week 52Placebo-8.96Standard Error 10.765meters
Estimated Within Treatment Group Lean Body Mass (LBM) Ratio at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg102.895% Confidence Interval 101.4 to 104.2Percentage
Estimated Within Treatment Group Lean Body Mass (LBM) Ratio at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg100.495% Confidence Interval 99.1 to 101.8Percentage
Estimated Within Treatment Group Lean Body Mass (LBM) Ratio at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg98.395% Confidence Interval 97.0 to 99.6Percentage
Estimated Within Treatment Group Lean Body Mass (LBM) Ratio at Week 52Placebo97.295% Confidence Interval 95.9 to 98.5Percentage
Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) on the Right Side at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg-12.44Standard Error 6.021newtons
Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) on the Right Side at Week 52BYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg-20.36Standard Error 5.843newtons

Participant flow40

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment EpochSTARTEDBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg63
Treatment EpochSTARTEDBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg63
Treatment EpochSTARTEDBYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg63
Treatment EpochSTARTEDPlacebo62
Treatment EpochFull Analysis SetBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg63
Treatment EpochFull Analysis SetBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg63
Treatment EpochFull Analysis SetBYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg63
Treatment EpochFull Analysis SetPlacebo62
Treatment EpochCOMPLETEDBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg54
Treatment EpochCOMPLETEDBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg55

Adverse events564

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg563
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg363
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg063
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo162
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg363
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg463
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg063
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo062
otherABDOMINAL PAIN UPPERGastrointestinal disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg263
otherABDOMINAL PAIN UPPERGastrointestinal disordersBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg663

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg
Total, all-cause mortalityBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg
Total, all-cause mortalityBYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg6363
Total, other adverse eventsBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg6363
Total, other adverse eventsBYM338/Bimagrumab 1 mg/kg6363
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo6162
Total, serious adverse eventsBYM338/Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg2163
Total, serious adverse eventsBYM338/Bimagrumab 3 mg/kg1163

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31397289DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01925209

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01925209/results?page=2