ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01929642

Rapalogues for Autism Phenotype in TSC: A Feasibility Study

NCT01929642, Phase 2, Completed, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.; results first posted 2021-03-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rapalogues for Autism Phenotype in TSC: A Feasibility Study. Trials, record NCT01929642. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01929642

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Rapalogues for Autism Phenotype in TSC: A Feasibility Study
NCT number
NCT01929642
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
3 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Conditions
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Self-injury, Autism
Interventions
Sirolimus, Everolimus
First posted
2013-08-28
Last updated
2021-03-29
Results first posted
2021-03-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Compliance to the Treatment Protocol.Change from baseline to EOT visit 12 week 53
One outcome measurement of feasibility will include family/patient compliance with the treatment protocol, which will be assessed and documented at every study visit and telephone follow-up call, by the physician and/or study team member. This was calculated by calculating dividing the total number of study visits and study assessments completed by the total number of study visits and study assessments indicated by the treatment protocol.
PrimaryCaregiver BurdenChange from baseline to EOT visit 12 week 53
The Caregiver Burden Scale is a standard set of questions which will be used to measure the non-medical impact of TSC on caregivers and how it affects the feasibility of study completion. The Caregiver's Burden Scale (CBS) is a 22-item scale that assess subjectively experienced burden by caregiver's to chronically disabled persons. maximum scores: 88 \& Minumum scores: 22 High values represent a worse outcome
PrimaryFeasibility Measurements of Parental StressChange from baseline to EOT visit 12 week 53
Measurements of stress will be administered. Specifically, we will use the Parental Stress Index. Quantifying stress, as well as compliance with the study protocol, will allow investigators to objectively assess the feasibility of a larger clinical trial of sirolimus in patients with TSC. Parental stress index maximum score: 180 Parental stress index minimum score: 36 higher raw scores indicate higher levels of stress.
SecondaryTotal Number of Aggressions or Self-injuries1 yearThis is the total number of aggressions or self-injuries for all participants.
SecondaryCognitive Function as Assessed by the Capute Scale1 yearScore range maximum: 100 Score range minimum: 0 High values represent a high cognitive function Below 70 is abnormal. 70-100 is the normal range.
SecondaryRepetitive Behavior1 year
Repetitive behavior will be assessed using the Repetitive Behavior Scale - revised, a questionnaire to characterize several domains of repetitive behavior including ritualistic behavior, stereotypic behavior, self-injurious behavior, compulsive behavior, and restricted interests. There are 36 items on the scale. Behaviors are rated on a 4-point scale: 0-Behavior does not occur, 1-Behavior occurs and is a mild problem, 2-Behavior occurs and is a moderate problem, 3-Behavior occurs and is a severe problem. Maximum score: 108 \& minimum score: 0 A high score represents the worse outcome
SecondarySelf-Injury Trauma Scale--SIT Scale1 year
The SIT Scale is a 3-part clinician-completed scale used to quantify visible injuries caused by self-injurious behavior(SIB). Part 1 includes sections to indicate SIB topographies and any evidence of healed injury. In Part 2 evaluators document the location and severity of injury (on a 3-point scale). In Part 3, respective scores from Parts 1 and 2 are summed to obtain a Number Index, a Severity Index, and Estimate of Current Risk. This Scale has been used in research with adults with SIB with inter-rater reliability averaging 85%. Maximum score: 100 Minimum score: 0 High score represent worse outcome.
SecondaryFrequency of Seizures Assessed by Total Number of Seizuresat baseline
Parents will be asked to document the frequency of their child's seizures using a manual or electronic (seizuretracker.com) seizure diary. The total number of seizures at baseline for all participants.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Compliance to the Treatment Protocol.Change from baseline to EOT visit 12 week 53percentage of completed visits/measuresNUMBER
PRIMARYCaregiver BurdenChange from baseline to EOT visit 12 week 53units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYFeasibility Measurements of Parental StressChange from baseline to EOT visit 12 week 53units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTotal Number of Aggressions or Self-injuries1 yearNumber of aggressions or self-injuriesNUMBER
SECONDARYCognitive Function as Assessed by the Capute Scale1 yearscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYRepetitive Behavior1 yearscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSelf-Injury Trauma Scale--SIT Scale1 yearSelf-injury was not severe enough to use the scale. Therefore analysis was not done.
SECONDARYFrequency of Seizures Assessed by Total Number of Seizuresat baselineseizuresNUMBER

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Compliance to the Treatment Protocol.Everolimus or SirolimusParticipant 002100percentage of completed visits/measures
Number of Participants With Compliance to the Treatment Protocol.Everolimus or SirolimusParticipant 00358percentage of completed visits/measures
Number of Participants With Compliance to the Treatment Protocol.Everolimus or SirolimusParticipant 00158percentage of completed visits/measures
Caregiver BurdenEverolimus or Sirolimus61Full Range 45 to 70units on a scale
Feasibility Measurements of Parental StressEverolimus or Sirolimus111Full Range 86 to 132units on a scale
Total Number of Aggressions or Self-injuriesEverolimus or Sirolimus82Number of aggressions or self-injuries
Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Capute ScaleEverolimus or Sirolimus15Full Range 14 to 21score on a scale
Repetitive BehaviorEverolimus or Sirolimus69Full Range 58 to 80score on a scale
Frequency of Seizures Assessed by Total Number of SeizuresEverolimus or Sirolimus0seizures

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSirolimus or Everolimus3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSirolimus or Everolimus1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSirolimus or Everolimus2

Adverse events1

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otheraphthous ulcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEverolimus131

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEverolimus
Total, other adverse eventsEverolimus13
Total, serious adverse eventsEverolimus03

Papers38

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
2039137BACKGROUNDPubMed
2335488BACKGROUNDPubMed
2516000BACKGROUNDPubMed
6630801BACKGROUNDPubMed
7525138BACKGROUNDPubMed
7814313BACKGROUNDPubMed
9813776BACKGROUNDPubMed
10385849BACKGROUNDPubMed
11055457BACKGROUNDPubMed
11591847BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 38

See all 38 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01929642

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01929642/papers?page=2