ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01948830

Randomized Study for Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5mg in Treat-extend and Monthly Regimens in Patients With nAMD

NCT01948830, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2016-12-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Randomized Study for Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5mg in Treat-extend and Monthly Regimens in Patients With nAMD. Trials, record NCT01948830. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01948830

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Randomized Study for Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5mg in Treat-extend and Monthly Regimens in Patients With nAMD
NCT number
NCT01948830
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
650 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Age-related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization
Interventions
Ranibizumab 0.5mg, Ranibizumab 0.5mg
First posted
2013-09-24
Last updated
2017-04-17
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-002626-23
Results first posted
2016-12-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12Baseline to month 12
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement
SecondaryNumber of Visits ScheduledFrom Month1 to Month 11The number of visits scheduled according to the treat and extend regimen after treatment initiation
SecondaryChange in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12Baseline to Month 12
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters
SecondaryAverage BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from Baseline to Month 12
SecondaryMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and compare to Baseline
SecondaryNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 12 as compared with baseline
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitBaseline and every month for 12 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 12 indicates a positive outcome
SecondaryThe Mean Number of Treatment FrequencyMonth 12The number of injections received
SecondaryThe Average Number of Days Between InjectionsMonth 12The average dosing interval was measured as the average number of days between injections

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12Baseline to month 12
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and study completion after last observational carried forward (LOCF) were included in this analysis. LOCF was used as an imputation of missing data.
Letters (EDTRS)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Visits ScheduledFrom Month1 to Month 11The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was analyzed.Number of visitsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12Baseline to Month 12
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and study completion after last observational carried forward (LOCF) were included in this analysis. LOCF was used as an imputation of missing data.
Letters (EDTRS)MEAN
SECONDARYAverage BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and average visual acuity (VA) from month 1 to study completion were included in this analysis.
Letters (EDTRS)MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.
Letters (EDTRS)MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.
Number of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitBaseline and every month for 12 months
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.
Number of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 months
The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.
Number of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Mean Number of Treatment FrequencyMonth 12
Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment regimen they were assigned to at randomization
Number of injectionsMEAN
SECONDARYThe Average Number of Days Between InjectionsMonth 12
Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment regimen they were assigned to at randomization
daysMEAN

Results by group292

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER6.2Standard Error 0.70Letters (EDTRS)
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly8.1Standard Error 0.70Letters (EDTRS)
Number of Visits ScheduledGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER8.9Standard Deviation 2.56Number of visits
Number of Visits ScheduledGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly11.2Standard Deviation 2.37Number of visits
Change in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER6.4Standard Deviation 14.11Letters (EDTRS)
Change in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly8.0Standard Deviation 11.61Letters (EDTRS)
Average BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER6.3Standard Deviation 10.50Letters (EDTRS)
Average BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly7.1Standard Deviation 9.41Letters (EDTRS)
Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMonth 1 (n=320, 322)4.6Standard Deviation 7.56Letters (EDTRS)
Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMonth 1 (n=320, 322)4.2Standard Deviation 6.98Letters (EDTRS)

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER323
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly327
Overall StudySafety SetGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER323
Overall StudySafety SetGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly326
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER290
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly295
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER33
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly32

Adverse events296

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAge-related macular degeneration (Fellow eye)Eye disordersGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER9323
otherAge-related macular degeneration (Fellow eye)Eye disordersGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly4326
otherBlepharitis (Fellow eye)Eye disordersGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER6323
otherBlepharitis (Fellow eye)Eye disordersGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly8326
otherBlepharitis (Study eye)Eye disordersGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER5323
otherBlepharitis (Study eye)Eye disordersGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly6326
otherCataract (Fellow eye)Eye disordersGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER7323
otherCataract (Fellow eye)Eye disordersGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly10326
otherCataract (Study eye)Eye disordersGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER7323
otherCataract (Study eye)Eye disordersGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly7326

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly
Total, other adverse eventsGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER164323
Total, other adverse eventsGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly166326
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER39323
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly42326

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31563866DERIVEDPubMed
32374423DERIVEDPubMed
34934034DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER vs Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01948830

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01948830/results?page=2