ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01960114

Study of Long-Acting Acetaminophen in Postoperative Dental Pain

NCT01960114, Phase 2, Completed, McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.; results first posted 2015-06-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Long-Acting Acetaminophen in Postoperative Dental Pain. Trials, record NCT01960114. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01960114

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Long-Acting Acetaminophen in Postoperative Dental Pain
NCT number
NCT01960114
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
403 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.
Conditions
Dental Pain
Interventions
Acetaminophen ER, Placebo
First posted
2013-10-10
Last updated
2015-07-10
Results first posted
2015-06-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 10 Hours (SPID 0-10)10 Hours
Time weighted sum of pain intensity difference scores from baseline over 10 hours. Pain intensity was evaluated using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain. SPID 0-10 = 0.25 x (PID at 15 min + PID at 30 min + PID at 45 min + PID at 60 min + PID at 75 min + PID at 90 min) + 0.5 x (PID at 120 min) + PID at 3 h + PID at 4 h + PID at 5 h + PID at 6 h + PID at 7 h + PID at 8 h + PID at 9 h + PID at 10 h.
SecondaryTime to Confirmed First Perceptible Pain ReliefWithin 12 Hours
Minutes until confirmed first perceptible pain relief was achieved. Stopwatch was started after the subject took the study medication. The subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when they first began to feel any pain relief. The first perceptible pain relief was confirmed if the subject also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful pain relief.
SecondaryTime to Meaningful Pain ReliefWithin 12 Hours
Minutes until meaningful pain relief was achieved. Stopwatch was started after the subject took the study medication. The subjects were instructed to stop the stopwatch when the relief from the starting pain was meaningful to them.
SecondaryDuration of Pain ReliefWithin 12 HoursMinutes until rescue medication was given.
SecondaryPatient Global Evaluation12 HoursPatient Assessment of the pain medication - Number of subjects rating the medication they received as a pain reliever on a score of 0-4, where 0=poor, 1=fair, 2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTime Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 10 Hours (SPID 0-10)10 HoursAnalysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to Confirmed First Perceptible Pain ReliefWithin 12 HoursAnalysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.MinutesMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Meaningful Pain ReliefWithin 12 HoursAnalysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.MinutesMEDIAN
SECONDARYDuration of Pain ReliefWithin 12 HoursAnalysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.MinutesMEDIAN
SECONDARYPatient Global Evaluation12 HoursAnalysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Time Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 10 Hours (SPID 0-10)Placebo5.745Standard Error 2.5056units on a scale
Time Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 10 Hours (SPID 0-10)ACE ER 1500 mg30.986Standard Error 1.8951units on a scale
Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Pain ReliefPlaceboNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMinutes
Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Pain ReliefACE ER 1500 mg26.81795% Confidence Interval 23.683 to 29.950Minutes
Time to Meaningful Pain ReliefPlaceboNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMinutes
Time to Meaningful Pain ReliefACE ER 1500 mg84.67595% Confidence Interval 66.333 to 120.633Minutes
Duration of Pain ReliefPlacebo106.595% Confidence Interval 99.000 to 132.000Minutes
Duration of Pain ReliefACE ER 1500 mgNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMinutes
Patient Global EvaluationPlaceboPoor (0)63.2percentage of participants
Patient Global EvaluationACE ER 1500 mgPoor (0)18.3percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo134
Overall StudySTARTEDACE ER 1500 mg269
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo133
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDACE ER 1500 mg268
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDACE ER 1500 mg1

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo14134
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersACE ER 1500 mg26268

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityACE ER 1500 mg
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo14134
Total, other adverse eventsACE ER 1500 mg26268
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0134
Total, serious adverse eventsACE ER 1500 mg0268

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
ACE ER 1500 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01960114

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01960114/registered