ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01963793

Topical Aprepitant in Prurigo Patients

NCT01963793, Phase 2, Completed, LEO Pharma; results first posted 2021-07-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Topical Aprepitant in Prurigo Patients. Trials, record NCT01963793. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01963793

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Topical Aprepitant in Prurigo Patients
NCT number
NCT01963793
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
20 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
LEO Pharma
Conditions
Pruritus
Interventions
Aprepitant, Placebo
First posted
2013-10-16
Last updated
2025-03-10
Results first posted
2021-07-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)At end of treatment (Day 28)
At end of treatment (Day 28) participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
SecondaryPruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28), and Day 42
At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42, participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Participants' Global Assessment on Treatment AreasAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42, participants assessed their prurigo on each treated area using the following score: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The change was calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline. The change at Day 1 was therefore 0 and negative values represent a decrease in score.
SecondaryClinical Score Assessment of CrustingAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator assessed the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score: Criteria: Crusts Evaluation: 0 = not existing 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
SecondaryClinical Score Assessment of ErythemaAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will assess the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score: Criteria: Erythema Evaluation: 0 = not existing 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
SecondaryClinical Score Assessment of Scratch ArtefactsAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will assess the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score: Criteria: Scratch artefacts: Superficial damage to the skin caused by severe scratching. Evaluation: 0 = not existing 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
SecondaryClinical Score Assessment of InfiltrationAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will assess the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score: Criteria: Infiltration Evaluation: 0 = not existing 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
SecondaryTransepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will made the following clinical assessment: Transepidermal water loss was defined as amount of released water from skin surface in g/cm\^2 per hour. The TEWL is increased in case of damage of skin barrier.
SecondaryLesional Erythema by MexameterAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The skin colour of the participants was evaluated by use of a Mexameter spectrophotometer. The instrument computed an erythema index (with a range between 0 and 999, where higher values indicate more erythema or redness) which may be used as an indication of skin properties. Mexameter measurements were performed at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 to assess stimulation of microcirculation, irritating effects, and occurring erythema.
SecondaryNon-lesional Erythema by MexameterAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The skin colour of the participants was evaluated by use of a Mexameter spectrophotometer. The instrument computed an erythema index (with a range between 0 and 999, where higher values indicate more erythema or redness) which may be used as an indication of skin properties. Mexameter measurements were performed at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 to assess stimulation of microcirculation, irritating effects, and occurring erythema.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)At end of treatment (Day 28)mmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28), and Day 42mmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Participants' Global Assessment on Treatment AreasAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Score Assessment of CrustingAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Score Assessment of ErythemaAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Score Assessment of Scratch ArtefactsAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Score Assessment of InfiltrationAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTransepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42g/cm² per hourMEAN
SECONDARYLesional Erythema by MexameterAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNon-lesional Erythema by MexameterAt baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group476

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant 10 mg/g Gel19.795% Confidence Interval 9.5 to 29.8mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant Gel Vehicle21.295% Confidence Interval 11.1 to 31.4mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant 10 mg/g GelDay 1 (Visit 2)50.8Standard Deviation 26.6mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant Gel VehicleDay 1 (Visit 2)58.1Standard Deviation 28.2mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant 10 mg/g GelDay 14 (Visit 3)27.1Standard Deviation 24.2mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant Gel VehicleDay 14 (Visit 3)28.7Standard Deviation 19.1mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant 10 mg/g GelDay 28 (Visit 4)19.0Standard Deviation 21.0mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant Gel VehicleDay 28 (Visit 4)21.9Standard Deviation 24.2mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant 10 mg/g GelDay 42 (Visit 5)23.9Standard Deviation 28.2mm
Pruritus by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)Aprepitant Gel VehicleDay 42 (Visit 5)24.0Standard Deviation 26.7mm

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAprepitant Gel / Aprepitant Gel Vehicle20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAprepitant Gel / Aprepitant Gel Vehicle20
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAprepitant Gel / Aprepitant Gel Vehicle0

Adverse events93

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVisual impairmentEye disordersTreatment Not Defined120
otherVisual impairmentEye disordersAprepitant Gel Vehicle020
otherVisual impairmentEye disordersAprepitant Gel020
otherApplication site discolourationGeneral disordersTreatment Not Defined020
otherApplication site discolourationGeneral disordersAprepitant Gel Vehicle020
otherApplication site discolourationGeneral disordersAprepitant Gel120
otherApplication site discomfortGeneral disordersTreatment Not Defined020
otherApplication site discomfortGeneral disordersAprepitant Gel Vehicle220
otherApplication site discomfortGeneral disordersAprepitant Gel420
otherApplication site erythemaGeneral disordersTreatment Not Defined020

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Not Defined020
Total, all-cause mortalityAprepitant Gel Vehicle020
Total, all-cause mortalityAprepitant Gel020
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Not Defined1020
Total, other adverse eventsAprepitant Gel Vehicle1520
Total, other adverse eventsAprepitant Gel1120
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Not Defined020
Total, serious adverse eventsAprepitant Gel Vehicle020
Total, serious adverse eventsAprepitant Gel020

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01963793

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01963793/results?page=2