ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01966471

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine (Kadcyla) Plus Pertuzumab (Perjeta) Following Anthracyclines in Comparison With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) Plus Pertuzumab and a Taxane Following Anthracyclines as Adjuvant Therapy in Participants With Operable HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer

NCT01966471, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2021-01-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine (Kadcyla) Plus Pertuzumab (Perjeta) Following Anthracyclines in Comparison With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) Plus Pertuzumab and a Taxane Following Anthracyclines as Adjuvant Therapy in Participants With Operable HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer. Trials, record NCT01966471. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01966471

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine (Kadcyla) Plus Pertuzumab (Perjeta) Following Anthracyclines in Comparison With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) Plus Pertuzumab and a Taxane Following Anthracyclines as Adjuvant Therapy in Participants With Operable HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT01966471
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,846 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Trastuzumab Emtansine, Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Paclitaxel, Epirubicin, Doxorubicin, Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide, 5-Fluorouracil
First posted
2013-10-21
Last updated
2022-06-14
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-004902-82
Results first posted
2021-01-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryInvasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Node-Positive Subpopulation
Last participant randomized to data cut-off date of 27 November 2019 (approximately 70 months). The 3 year IDFS event-free rate was assessed based on the data collected for each participant considering the cut-off date mentioned above.
IDFS event was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of one of the following: Ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence (an invasive breast cancer \[bc\] involving the same breast parenchyma as the original primary lesion); Ipsilateral local-regional invasive bc recurrence (an invasive bc in the axilla, regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and/or skin of the ipsilateral breast); Contralateral or ipsilateral second primary invasive bc; Distant recurrence (evidence of bc in any anatomic site \[other than the three sites mentioned above\]) that has either been histologically confirmed or clinically/radiographically diagnosed as recurrent invasive bc; Death attributable to any cause, including bc, non-bc, or unknown cause. 3-year IDFS event-free rate per randomized treatment arms in the ITT population was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated the probability of a participant being event-free after 3 years after randomization.
PrimaryInvasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Overall PopulationFirst participant randomized up to approximately 7.5 years
IDFS event was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of one of the following: Ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence (an invasive breast cancer \[bc\] involving the same breast parenchyma as the original primary lesion); Ipsilateral local-regional invasive bc recurrence (an invasive bc in the axilla, regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and/or skin of the ipsilateral breast); Contralateral or ipsilateral second primary invasive bc; Distant recurrence (evidence of bc in any anatomic site \[other than the three sites mentioned above\]) that has either been histologically confirmed or clinically/radiographically diagnosed as recurrent invasive bc; Death attributable to any cause, including bc, non-bc, or unknown cause. 3-year IDFS event-free rate per randomized treatment arms in the ITT population were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated the probability of a patient being event-free after 3 years after randomization.
SecondaryIDFS Plus Second Primary Non-Breast CancerBaseline up to approximately 70 months
IDFS including second primary non-breast cancer was defined the same way as IDFS for the primary endpoint but including second primary non breast invasive cancer as an event (with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers and carcinoma in situ (CIS) of any site).
SecondaryDisease-Free Survival (DFS)Baseline up to approximately 70 monthsDFS was defined as time between randomization and first occurrence of IDFS, second primary non-breast cancer and contralateral or ipsilateral ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
SecondaryDistant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI)Baseline up to approximately 70 monthsDRFI was defined as time between randomization and first occurrence of distant breast cancer recurrence.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)First participant randomized up to approximately 7.5 yearsOS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom randomization to approximately 7.5 years
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. AEs were reported based on the national cancer institute common terminology criteria for AEs, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE, v4.0).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline Over TimeFirst participant randomized up to approximately 7.5 years.LVEF was assessed using either echocardiogram (ECHO) or multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans.
SecondaryEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreBaseline, Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 14, End of Treatment, Follow-up Month 6, Follow-up Month 12, Follow-up Month 18
The EORTC QLQ-C30 included global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain) and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale \[1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'\]). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 - 100 scale, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 7 - 15 points considered to be a clinically meaningful detioration to participants. A positive value means an increase, while a negative value means a decrease, in score at the indicated time-point relative to the score at baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1).
SecondaryEORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Cancer 23 (QLQ-BR23) ScoreBaseline, Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 14, End of Treatment, Follow-up Month 6, Follow-up Month 12, Follow-up Month 18
EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30. There are four functional scales (body image, sexual enjoyment, sexual functioning, future perspective \[FP\]) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects \[SE\], upset by hair loss, arm symptoms, breast symptoms). Questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. High score for functional scale indicated high/better level of functioning/healthy functioning. Higher scores for symptom scales represent higher levels of symptoms/problems. For functional scales, positive change from baseline indicated improvement in quality of life (QOL) while negative change from baseline indicated a deterioration. For symptom scales, positive change from baseline indicated deterioration and negative change indicated improvement.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYInvasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Node-Positive Subpopulation
Last participant randomized to data cut-off date of 27 November 2019 (approximately 70 months). The 3 year IDFS event-free rate was assessed based on the data collected for each participant considering the cut-off date mentioned above.
The ITT lymph node positive population was a subpopulation of the randomized participant population including patients with positive lymph node.Percent ProbabilityNUMBER
PRIMARYInvasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Overall PopulationFirst participant randomized up to approximately 7.5 years
The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.
Percent ProbabilityNUMBER
SECONDARYIDFS Plus Second Primary Non-Breast CancerBaseline up to approximately 70 months
The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.
Percent ProbabilityNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease-Free Survival (DFS)Baseline up to approximately 70 months
The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.
Percent ProbabilityNUMBER
SECONDARYDistant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI)Baseline up to approximately 70 monthsPercent ProbabilityNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)First participant randomized up to approximately 7.5 years
The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.
Percent ProbabilityNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom randomization to approximately 7.5 years
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one full or partial dose of any study treatment. 8 participants were randomized but did not receive any study treatment (5 in the Anthracycline, Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane \[AC-THP\] arm, 3 in the Anthracycline, Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab \[AC-KP\] arm). 16 participants in the AC-THP and 13 participants in the AC-KP arm only received AC but no HER2 targeted therapy and were assigned to the AC-THP arm.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline Over TimeFirst participant randomized up to approximately 7.5 years.The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one full or partial dose of any study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreBaseline, Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 14, End of Treatment, Follow-up Month 6, Follow-up Month 12, Follow-up Month 18
The Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Population includes participants with both a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment in any PRO items. The variation of the number of participants in the table reflects the number of participants with corresponding scores at the given visits and at baseline.
Units on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYEORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast Cancer 23 (QLQ-BR23) ScoreBaseline, Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 14, End of Treatment, Follow-up Month 6, Follow-up Month 12, Follow-up Month 18
The Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Population includes participants with both a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment in any PRO items. The variation of the number of participants in the table reflects the number of participants with corresponding scores at the given visits and at baseline.
Units on a ScaleMEAN

Results by group551

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Node-Positive SubpopulationAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane94.1095% Confidence Interval 92.46 to 95.73Percent Probability
Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Node-Positive SubpopulationAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab92.7595% Confidence Interval 90.95 to 94.54Percent Probability
Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Overall PopulationAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane94.2295% Confidence Interval 92.68 to 95.76Percent Probability
Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Overall PopulationAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab93.0695% Confidence Interval 91.40 to 94.73Percent Probability
IDFS Plus Second Primary Non-Breast CancerAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane93.4395% Confidence Interval 91.79 to 95.06Percent Probability
IDFS Plus Second Primary Non-Breast CancerAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab92.2695% Confidence Interval 90.51 to 94.02Percent Probability
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane93.3295% Confidence Interval 91.67 to 94.97Percent Probability
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab92.0495% Confidence Interval 90.26 to 93.81Percent Probability
Distant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI)Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane95.2395% Confidence Interval 93.82 to 96.64Percent Probability
Distant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI)Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab94.9195% Confidence Interval 93.46 to 96.36Percent Probability

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane918
Overall StudySTARTEDAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab928
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane918
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab928

Adverse events590

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane184926249
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab174912243
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane73926134
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab5191296
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane232926411
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab220912403
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane2592629
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab162912297
otherDry eyeEye disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane6292669
otherDry eyeEye disordersAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab7591287

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane45926
Total, all-cause mortalityAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab55912
Total, other adverse eventsAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane902926
Total, other adverse eventsAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab902912
Total, serious adverse eventsAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane216926
Total, serious adverse eventsAnthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab195912

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
34890214DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane vs Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Taxane vs Anthracycline Followed by Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01966471

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01966471/results?page=2