ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01969708

Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2)

NCT01969708, Phase 3, Completed, The Emmes Company, LLC; results first posted 2018-08-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2). Trials, record NCT01969708. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01969708

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2)
NCT number
NCT01969708
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
362 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
The Emmes Company, LLC
Conditions
Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
Interventions
aflibercept, bevacizumab
First posted
2013-10-25
Last updated
2021-06-22
Results first posted
2018-08-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Month 0 to 6
The primary analysis is based on observed data at 6 months. The measure is calculated by subtracting the baseline visual acuity letter score from the month 6 visual acuity letter score. The participant is refracted for best corrected vision, and then reads single letters on an electronic visual acuity tester at a 3 meter distance according to a specific algorithm. A letter score is provided that ranges from 0 (unable to ready any letters) to 100. A visual acuity letter score of 85 corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/20 as a Snellen equivalent.
SecondaryNumber of Study Eyes With Gain of ≥15 Letters in Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Month 0 to 6The measure is the number of study eyes that gained at least 15 letters in their visual acuity letter score at month 6
SecondaryNumber of Study Eyes With Visual Acuity Letter Score of 70 or Better at Month 6Month 0 to 6The measure is the number of study eyes with a visual acuity letter score of 70 (Snellen equivalent of 20/40) or better at month 6
SecondaryMean Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessMonth 0 to 6The measure is the mean central subfield thickness at month 6 measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness at Month 6Month 0 to 6The measure is calculated by subtracting the baseline central subfield thickness from the month 6 central subfield thickness
SecondaryNumber of Study Eyes With Central Subfield Thickness <300 μm, no Subretinal Fluid, no Intraretinal Fluid, and no Cystoid SpacesMonth 0 to 6The measure is the number of study eyes with central subfield thickness \<300 μm, no subretinal fluid, no intraretinal fluid, and no cystoid spaces at month 6

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Month 0 to 6All participants with visual acuity letter score recorded at Month 6letters readMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Study Eyes With Gain of ≥15 Letters in Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Month 0 to 6All participants with visual acuity letter score recorded at Month 6study eyesNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Study Eyes With Visual Acuity Letter Score of 70 or Better at Month 6Month 0 to 6All participants with visual acuity letter score recorded at Month 6study eyesNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessMonth 0 to 6All participants with central subfield thickness recorded at baseline and Month 6umMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness at Month 6Month 0 to 6All participants with central subfield thickness recorded at baseline and Month 6umMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Study Eyes With Central Subfield Thickness <300 μm, no Subretinal Fluid, no Intraretinal Fluid, and no Cystoid SpacesMonth 0 to 6All participants with central subfield thickness recorded at Month 6study eyesNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Aflibercept18.995% Confidence Interval 16.62 to 21.15letters read
Mean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Bevacizumab18.695% Confidence Interval 16.16 to 21.09letters read
Number of Study Eyes With Gain of ≥15 Letters in Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Aflibercept114study eyes
Number of Study Eyes With Gain of ≥15 Letters in Visual Acuity Letter Score at Month 6Bevacizumab106study eyes
Number of Study Eyes With Visual Acuity Letter Score of 70 or Better at Month 6Aflibercept101study eyes
Number of Study Eyes With Visual Acuity Letter Score of 70 or Better at Month 6Bevacizumab99study eyes
Mean Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessAflibercept231.395% Confidence Interval 220.8 to 241.8um
Mean Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessBevacizumab287.995% Confidence Interval 269.4 to 306.4um
Mean Change From Baseline in Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness at Month 6Aflibercept-42595% Confidence Interval -461 to -389um
Mean Change From Baseline in Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness at Month 6Bevacizumab-38795% Confidence Interval -426 to -348um

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAflibercept180
Overall StudySTARTEDBevacizumab182
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAflibercept175
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBevacizumab173
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAflibercept5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBevacizumab9

Adverse events420

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersAflibercept01800
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersBevacizumab11821
otherAcarodermatitisInfections and infestationsAflibercept01800
otherAcarodermatitisInfections and infestationsBevacizumab11821
otherAcute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disordersAflibercept11801
otherAcute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disordersBevacizumab21822
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAflibercept11801
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBevacizumab01820
otherAneurysmVascular disordersAflibercept01800
otherAneurysmVascular disordersBevacizumab11821

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept1180
Total, all-cause mortalityBevacizumab1182
Total, other adverse eventsAflibercept82180
Total, other adverse eventsBevacizumab98182
Total, serious adverse eventsAflibercept14180
Total, serious adverse eventsBevacizumab14182

Papers20

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27450625BACKGROUNDPubMed
27863843BACKGROUNDPubMed
28492860BACKGROUNDPubMed
28492910RESULTPubMed
29074161BACKGROUNDPubMed
29476687BACKGROUNDPubMed
29746405BACKGROUNDPubMed
30589922BACKGROUNDPubMed
31169862DERIVEDPubMed
31600368DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 20

See all 20 papers

Grants3

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10EY023521SCORE2 Comparative Trial (SCT)BLODI, BARBARA AUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISONNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE2013 to 2018NIH RePORTER
U10EY023529SCORE2 Comparative Trial (SCT)VAN VELDHUISEN, PAUL CTHE EMMES COMPANY, LLCNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE2013 to 2018NIH RePORTER
U10EY023533SCORE2 Comparative Trial (SCT)SCOTT, INGRID UPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTRNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE2013 to 2018NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Aflibercept vs Bevacizumab: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Aflibercept vs Bevacizumab: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01969708

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01969708/events?page=2