ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01974141

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Dapsone Gel in Patients With Acne Vulgaris

NCT01974141, Phase 3, Completed, Almirall, S.A.; results first posted 2017-02-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Safety and Efficacy Study of Dapsone Gel in Patients With Acne Vulgaris. Trials, record NCT01974141. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01974141

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Dapsone Gel in Patients With Acne Vulgaris
NCT number
NCT01974141
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
2,102 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Almirall, S.A.
Conditions
Acne Vulgaris
Interventions
Dapsone Gel, Dapsone Gel Vehicle
First posted
2013-11-01
Last updated
2018-10-09
Results first posted
2017-02-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With a Score of 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the 5-point Global Acne Assessment Score (GAAS)Week 12
The Investigator evaluated the patient's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS scale with 0 being none and 4 being severe. The complete scale is as follow: Grade 0 (none) = No evidence of facila acne vulgaris; Grade 1 (minimal) = Few noninflammatory lesions (comedones) are present, a few inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules) may be present, no nodulo-cyctic lesions are allowed; Grade 2 (mild) = Several to many noninflammatory lesions (comedones) are present, a few inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules) are present, no nodulo-cystic lesions are allowed; Grade 3 (moderate) = Many noninflammatory (comedones) and inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules) are present, no nodulo-cystic lesions are allowed; Grade 4 (severe) = Significant degree of inflammatory disease, papules/pustules are a predominant feature, a few nodulo-cystic lesions may be present, comedones may be present.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Facial Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12
The Investigator evaluated the patient's inflammatory lesions (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst). A negative change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement) and a positive change from baseline indicates an increase in lesion counts (worsening).
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Noninflammatory Facial Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12
The Investigator evaluated the patient's noninflammatory lesions (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst). A negative change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement) and a positive change from baseline indicates an increase in lesion counts (worsening).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12
The Investigator evaluated the patient's inflammatory (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst) and non-inflammatory (blackhead and whitehead) lesions. A papule is a small, red, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter, a pustule is a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate and a nodule/cyst is a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 0.5 cm in diameter with palpable depth. The total lesion count was the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. A negative change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement) and a positive change from baseline indicates an increase in lesion counts (worsening).
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12
The Investigator evaluated the patient's Inflammatory (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst) and Non-inflammatory (blackhead and whitehead) lesions. A papule is a small, red, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter, a pustule is a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate and a nodule/cyst is a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 0.5 cm in diameter with palpable depth. The total lesion count was the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement) and a positive percent change from baseline indicates an increase in lesion counts (worsening).
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Reporting "Very Good" or "Excellent" on Item 10 of the 5-Point Acne Symptom Impact Scale (ASIS)Week 12
The patient assessed the impact of their acne vulgaris on the look of their face using item 10 on the 5-point ASIS. Item 10 scores range from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Bad). The percentage of patients who had an ASIS score of 4 (Fair) or 5 (Bad) at baseline and who reported "Very good" or "Excellent" at Week 12 are reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the 9-Item ASIS Sign Domain ScoreBaseline, Week 12
The patient assessed signs of acne vulgaris using the ASIS. The sign domain is a composite of 9 items of the 17 items on the overall scale. Each of the items is assessed on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to 4 (worst). The sign domain score is calculated as the average of the 9 items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Reporting at Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline in Facial Oiliness on a the 5-Point ASIS ScaleBaseline, Week 12
The patient assessed their facial oiliness using item 1 on the 5-point ASIS. Item 1 scores ranged from 0 (Not at all oily) to 4 (Very oily). The percentage of patients who reported at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline in their facial oiliness are reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Reporting at Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline in Facial Redness on a the 5-Point ASIS ScaleBaseline, Week 12
The patient assessed their facial redness using item 8 on the 5-point ASIS. Item 8 scores ranged from 0 (Not at all red) to 4 (Very red). The percentage of patients who reported at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline in their facial redness are reported.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients With a Score of 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the 5-point Global Acne Assessment Score (GAAS)Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsPercentage of PatientsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Facial Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsNumber of Inflammatory LesionsMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Noninflammatory Facial Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsNumber of Noninflammatory LesionsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsTotal Lesion CountsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsPercent Change in Lesion CountLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Reporting Very Good or Excellent on Item 10 of the 5-Point Acne Symptom Impact Scale (ASIS)Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients with data at this time point, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsPercentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the 9-Item ASIS Sign Domain ScoreBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsScores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Reporting at Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline in Facial Oiliness on a the 5-Point ASIS ScaleBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsPercentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Reporting at Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline in Facial Redness on a the 5-Point ASIS ScaleBaseline, Week 12Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patients, excluding patients from a site with Good Clinical Practice violationsPercentage of PatientsNUMBER

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Patients With a Score of 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the 5-point Global Acne Assessment Score (GAAS)Dapsone Gel29.9Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Patients With a Score of 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the 5-point Global Acne Assessment Score (GAAS)Dapsone Gel Vehicle21.2Percentage of Patients
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone GelBaseline29.0Standard Error 0.25Number of Inflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone Gel VehicleBaseline29.4Standard Error 0.25Number of Inflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone GelChange from Baseline at Week 12-16.1Standard Error 0.32Number of Inflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone Gel VehicleChange from Baseline at Week 12-14.1Standard Error 0.32Number of Inflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Noninflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone GelBaseline47.0Standard Error 0.53Number of Noninflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Noninflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone Gel VehicleBaseline48.7Standard Error 0.53Number of Noninflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Noninflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone GelChange from Baseline at Week 12-20.8Standard Error 0.56Number of Noninflammatory Lesions
Change From Baseline in Noninflammatory Facial Lesion CountsDapsone Gel VehicleChange from Baseline at Week 12-17.6Standard Error 0.55Number of Noninflammatory Lesions

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDapsone Gel1,044
Overall StudySTARTEDDapsone Gel Vehicle1,058
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDapsone Gel948
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDapsone Gel Vehicle976
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDapsone Gel96
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDapsone Gel Vehicle82

Adverse events16

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousApplication Site DermatitisGeneral disordersDapsone Gel11,044
seriousApplication Site DermatitisGeneral disordersDapsone Gel Vehicle01,057
seriousAppendicitisInfections and infestationsDapsone Gel11,044
seriousAppendicitisInfections and infestationsDapsone Gel Vehicle01,057
seriousTibia FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDapsone Gel11,044
seriousTibia FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDapsone Gel Vehicle01,057
seriousAbortion InducedSurgical and medical proceduresDapsone Gel0591
seriousAbortion InducedSurgical and medical proceduresDapsone Gel Vehicle1581
seriousLumbar Vertebral FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDapsone Gel01,044
seriousLumbar Vertebral FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDapsone Gel Vehicle11,057

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDapsone Gel
Total, all-cause mortalityDapsone Gel Vehicle
Total, other adverse eventsDapsone Gel01,044
Total, other adverse eventsDapsone Gel Vehicle01,057
Total, serious adverse eventsDapsone Gel31,044
Total, serious adverse eventsDapsone Gel Vehicle51,057

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27847545DERIVEDPubMed
30500139DERIVEDPubMed
30500140DERIVEDPubMed
30500141DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Dapsone Gel vs Dapsone Gel Vehicle: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01974141

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01974141/results?page=2