ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01979211

Post-operative Radiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

NCT01979211, Phase 2, Completed, University of Cincinnati; results first posted 2022-05-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Post-operative Radiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Trials, record NCT01979211. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01979211

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Post-operative Radiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
NCT number
NCT01979211
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
24 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Cincinnati
Conditions
Head and Neck Cancer
Interventions
Cetuximab, Radiation Therapy
First posted
2013-11-08
Last updated
2024-02-29
Results first posted
2022-05-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Regional Control2 years
The primary endpoint of this study was 2-year locoregional control (LRC), defined as no evidence of recurrent cancer in the tumor bed and/or neck as assessed via clinical exam and imaging. Locoregional control was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Kaplan-Meier method is a statistical method used to assess survival times while factoring for censored observations (those who had LRC) and the time for them to be censored.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival2 years
The primary endpoint of this study was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), which was the absence of locoregional recurrence or metastatic disease (biopsied when possible). DFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Kaplan-Meier method is a statistical method used to assess survival times while factoring for censored observations (those who were alive disease-free) and the time for them to be censored.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival5 years
The primary endpoint of this study was 5-year overall survival (OS), defined as the absence of death from any cause during those respective time periods. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Kaplan-Meier method is a statistical method used to assess survival times while factoring for censored observations (those who were alive) and the time for them to be censored.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Local Regional Control2 years
24 data points were included in the Kaplan-Meier method and yielded an predicted percentage of individuals with LRC at a 2 year mark. Analysis yielded a predicted 91% of subjects had LRC. Extrapolating this percentage to the overall number of participants analyzed, 21.84 subjects had LRC.
percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival2 years
24 data points were included in the Kaplan-Meier method and yielded an predicted percentage of individuals with DFS at a 2 year mark. Analysis predicted 70.8% of subjects were alive with no disease. Extrapolating this percentage to the overall number of participants analyzed, 16.99 subjects were alive with no disease.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival5 years
24 data points were included in the Kaplan-Meier method and yielded an predicted percentage of individuals with OS at a 5 year mark. Analysis predicted 56.1% of subjects were alive. Extrapolating this percentage to the overall number of participants analyzed, 13.34 subjects were alive at the 5 year mark.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group3

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Local Regional ControlCetuximab and Radiation91.195% Confidence Interval 80 to 100percentage of subjects
Percentage of Participants With Disease-free SurvivalCetuximab and Radiation70.895% Confidence Interval 54.8 to 91.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalCetuximab and Radiation56.195% Confidence Interval 38.7 to 81.3percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCetuximab and Radiation24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCetuximab and Radiation24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCetuximab and Radiation0

Adverse events63

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersCetuximab and Radiation1241
otherAcute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disordersCetuximab and Radiation2249
otherAlkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigationsCetuximab and Radiation1241
otherAllergic reactionImmune system disordersCetuximab and Radiation1242
otherAlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersCetuximab and Radiation1243
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCetuximab and Radiation1244
otherAnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersCetuximab and Radiation52428
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersCetuximab and Radiation1241
otherBlurred visionEye disordersCetuximab and Radiation12411
otherChillsGeneral disordersCetuximab and Radiation1242

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCetuximab and Radiation924
Total, other adverse eventsCetuximab and Radiation2424
Total, serious adverse eventsCetuximab and Radiation324

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01979211

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01979211/events?page=2