ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01981772

Efficacy of Buffered Lidocaine in Patients With Facial Swelling

NCT01981772, Not applicable, Completed, Ohio State University; results first posted 2020-10-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Buffered Lidocaine in Patients With Facial Swelling. Trials, record NCT01981772. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01981772

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Buffered Lidocaine in Patients With Facial Swelling
NCT number
NCT01981772
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
88 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ohio State University
Conditions
Orofacial Swelling
Interventions
4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% buffered lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
First posted
2013-11-13
Last updated
2020-10-12
Results first posted
2020-10-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPain Measurement as Assessed on a Heft-Parker 170 mm Visual Analog Scaleduring incision/drainage on Day 0
Patients will rate pain on a Heft-Parker visual analog scale during needle insertion, placement, and solution deposition phases of the anesthetic injection(s). Patients will also rate pain during the incision and dissection phases of the incision and drainage procedure. The number of millimeters along the scale are reported. No pain corresponded to 0 mm. Mild pain was defined as greater than 0 mm and less than or equal to 54 mm. Mild pain included the descriptors of "faint", "weak", and "mild pain". Moderate pain was defined as greater than 54 mm and less than 114 mm and included the descriptor "moderate". Severe pain was defined as equal to or greater than 114 mm up to and including 170 mm. Severe pain included the descriptors of "strong", "intense", and "maximum possible."
SecondaryPostoperative Satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scaleimmediately post-procedure on Day 0
Patients will rate their level of satisfaction with the incision and drainage procedure using a visual analog scale. The scale ranges from "not satisfied," to "somewhat satisfied," to "moderately satisfied," to "completely satisfied." Not satisfied corresponded to 0 mm. Somewhat satisfied was defined as greater than 0 mm and less than or equal to 33 mm. Moderately satisfied was defined as greater than 33 mm and less than 66 mm. Completely satisfied was defined as equal to or greater than 66 mm. Measurements along the scale were collected and analyzed by randomization test.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPain Measurement as Assessed on a Heft-Parker 170 mm Visual Analog Scaleduring incision/drainage on Day 0units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPostoperative Satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scaleimmediately post-procedure on Day 0units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pain Measurement as Assessed on a Heft-Parker 170 mm Visual Analog ScaleBuffered Lidocaine69.3Standard Deviation 60.1units on a scale
Pain Measurement as Assessed on a Heft-Parker 170 mm Visual Analog ScaleNonbuffered Lidocaine59.2Standard Deviation 50.5units on a scale
Postoperative Satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analog ScaleBuffered Lidocaine92.7Standard Deviation 15.1units on a scale
Postoperative Satisfaction on a 100 mm Visual Analog ScaleNonbuffered Lidocaine89.5Standard Deviation 13.7units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBuffered Lidocaine45
Overall StudySTARTEDNonbuffered Lidocaine43
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBuffered Lidocaine45
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNonbuffered Lidocaine43
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBuffered Lidocaine0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNonbuffered Lidocaine0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBuffered Lidocaine045
Total, all-cause mortalityNonbuffered Lidocaine043
Total, other adverse eventsBuffered Lidocaine045
Total, other adverse eventsNonbuffered Lidocaine043
Total, serious adverse eventsBuffered Lidocaine045
Total, serious adverse eventsNonbuffered Lidocaine043

Papers25

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31377BACKGROUNDPubMed
1314142BACKGROUNDPubMed
1318956BACKGROUNDPubMed
1539881BACKGROUNDPubMed
2008283BACKGROUNDPubMed
3717616BACKGROUNDPubMed
3863874BACKGROUNDPubMed
4537424BACKGROUNDPubMed
5256508BACKGROUNDPubMed
6462727BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 25

See all 25 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Buffered Lidocaine vs Nonbuffered Lidocaine: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Buffered Lidocaine vs Nonbuffered Lidocaine: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01981772

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01981772/papers?page=2