ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01983683

Efficacy and Safety of Cadazolid Versus Vancomycin in Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea

NCT01983683, Phase 3, Completed, Actelion; results first posted 2018-04-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Cadazolid Versus Vancomycin in Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea. Trials, record NCT01983683. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01983683

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Cadazolid Versus Vancomycin in Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea
NCT number
NCT01983683
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
631 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Actelion
Conditions
Clostridium Difficile Infection
Interventions
Cadazolid, Vancomycin, Cadazolid-matching placebo, Vancomycin-matching placebo
First posted
2013-11-14
Last updated
2025-02-04
Results first posted
2018-04-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)
Clinical Cure is defined as: • Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD) (≤ 3 unformed bowel movement (UBM) per day for at least 2 consecutive days) on study treatment and maintained for 2 days after end-of-treatment (EOT), AND • No additional antimicrobial treatment active against Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) or fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) between first dose of study drug and 2 days after EOT (inclusive). CCR is the percentage of subjects with Clinical Cure. Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT) are reported below.
PrimaryClinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)
Clinical Cure (CC) is defined as: • Resolution of Diarrhea (≤ 3 unformed bowel movement per day for at least 2 consecutive days) on study treatment and maintained for 2 days after end-of-treatment (EOT), AND • No additional antimicrobial treatment active against Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) or fecal microbiota transplant between first dose of study drug and 2 days after EOT. CCR is the percentage of subjects with Clinical Cure. Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the per-protocol set (PPS) are reported below.
SecondarySustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationBetween Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)
Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. SCR is the percentage of subjects with Sustained Cure. The main analysis is performed on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT).
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD)Up to Day 10
Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD) is defined as no more than 3 unformed bowel movements per day for at least two consecutive days for subjects on study treatment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates (KM estimates) for having an event (ROD) are reported for each time point.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Day 3 in Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Daily Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome (CDI-DaySyms PRO) Domain ScoresBaseline to End of Treatment (10 days after starting study drug) + 2 days
CDI-DaySyms PRO is a questionnaire assessing 10 symptoms relevant to subjects with CDAD and grouped into 3 domains: Diarrhea symptoms, Abdominal symptoms and Systemic/Other. The subjects rate the severity of each item as None, Mild, Moderate, Severe or Very severe, converted to numeric scores from 0 to 4, respectively. The daily domain score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing responses for that domain on that day. A negative value for change from baseline corresponds to an improvement in domain score. The three domains are evaluated in a hierarchical manner, starting with Diarrhea Symptoms, then Abdominal Symptoms, and finally Systemic/Other Symptoms.
OtherInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)
ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with clinical response assessed as cured according to the investigator's own judgement. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as not cured for the analysis. ICR rate is used as a supportive measure of the primary efficacy endpoint (CCR). Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT) are reported below.
OtherInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Per-protocol PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)
ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with clinical response assessed as cured according to the investigator's own judgement. ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with ICR assessed as cured. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as not cured for the analysis. ICR rate is used as a supportive measure of the primary efficacy endpoint (CCR). Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the per-protocol set (PPS) are reported below.
OtherInvestigator's Assessment of Sustained Response Rate (ISR Rate) at Visit 5Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28 to 32 days)
ISR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects assessed as Sustained Cure at Visit 5, according to the investigator's own judgement. Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as having 'Not Sustained Cure' for the analysis. ISR rate is used as a supportive measure of the secondary efficacy endpoint (SCR). Analyses are performed on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT).
OtherSustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Per-protocol PopulationBetween Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)
Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. SCR is the percentage of subjects with Sustained Cure. The analyses performed on the modified intent-to- treat set (mITT) are repeated on the per-protocol set (PPS) for sensitivity.
OtherRecurrence RateBetween Day 13 and Day 40 on average (from end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days)
Recurrence is defined as the occurrence of a new episode of diarrhea (\> 3 unformed bowel movements on any day between end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days ) Recurrence rates is the percentage of subjects assessed as having a recurrence out of subjects with Clinical Cure.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYClinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)
Modified intent-to-treat population (mITT): all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had a confirmed diagnosis of CDAD, and excluding 22 randomized subjects due to potential data integrity issues.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYClinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)per-protocol population: all subjects from the mITT population without protocol deviations that might affect the evaluation of the effect of the study drug on the primary variable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationBetween Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)
Modified intent-to-treat population (mITT): all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had a confirmed diagnosis of CDAD, and excluding 22 randomized subjects due to potential data integrity issues.
Percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD)Up to Day 10
Modified intent-to-treat population (mITT): all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had a confirmed diagnosis of CDAD, and excluding 22 randomized subjects due to potential data integrity issues.
KM estimate (% subjects with ROD)NUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Day 3 in Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Daily Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome (CDI-DaySyms PRO) Domain ScoresBaseline to End of Treatment (10 days after starting study drug) + 2 days
All subjects from the modified intent-to-treat population, excluding those who participated in the validation sub-study. No imputation of missing scores is performed prior to deriving response status. Subjects with missing values at baseline or at Day 3 are considered to be non-responders.
Scores on a scaleNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)
Modified intent-to-treat population: all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had a confirmed diagnosis of CDAD, and excluding 22 randomized subjects due to potential data integrity issues.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Per-protocol PopulationUp to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)Per-protocol population: all subjects from the mITT analysis set without protocol deviations that might affect the evaluation of the effect of the study drug on the primary variable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDInvestigator's Assessment of Sustained Response Rate (ISR Rate) at Visit 5Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28 to 32 days)
Modified intent-to-treat population (mITT): all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had a confirmed diagnosis of CDAD, and excluding 22 randomized subjects due to potential data integrity issues.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDSustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Per-protocol PopulationBetween Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)Per-protocol population: all subjects from the mITT population without protocol deviations that might affect the evaluation of the effect of the study drug on the primary variable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDRecurrence RateBetween Day 13 and Day 40 on average (from end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days)Subjects from the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (mITT) with clinical curePercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationCadazolid8195% Confidence Interval 76.1 to 85.1Percentage of participants
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationVancomycin85.795% Confidence Interval 81.3 to 89.2Percentage of participants
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol PopulationCadazolid86.695% Confidence Interval 81.8 to 90.3Percentage of participants
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol PopulationVancomycin91.595% Confidence Interval 87.5 to 94.3Percentage of participants
Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationCadazolid63.495% Confidence Interval 57.8 to 68.8Percentage of subjects
Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat PopulationVancomycin61.895% Confidence Interval 56.2 to 67.1Percentage of subjects
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD)CadazolidDay 151.095% Confidence Interval 45.4 to 56.9KM estimate (% subjects with ROD)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD)VancomycinDay 145.895% Confidence Interval 40.4 to 51.6KM estimate (% subjects with ROD)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD)CadazolidDay 264.595% Confidence Interval 59.0 to 70.0KM estimate (% subjects with ROD)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD)VancomycinDay 259.895% Confidence Interval 54.3 to 65.4KM estimate (% subjects with ROD)

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCadazolid298
Overall StudySTARTEDVancomycin311
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCadazolid260
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVancomycin260
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCadazolid38
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVancomycin51

Adverse events174

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherClostridium difficile infectionInfections and infestationsCadazolid1029411
otherClostridium difficile infectionInfections and infestationsVancomycin1730717
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersCadazolid1329415
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersVancomycin1830721
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCadazolid1629419
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVancomycin1130713
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersCadazolid1529420
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersVancomycin1130712
seriousAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersCadazolid12941
seriousAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersVancomycin03070

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCadazolid11294
Total, all-cause mortalityVancomycin15307
Total, other adverse eventsCadazolid47294
Total, other adverse eventsVancomycin51307
Total, serious adverse eventsCadazolid35294
Total, serious adverse eventsVancomycin46307

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29680101DERIVEDPubMed
30709665DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cadazolid vs Vancomycin: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Cadazolid vs Vancomycin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01983683

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01983683/results?page=2