ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02006121

Clinical Trial of Apomorphine Subcutaneous Infusion in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease

NCT02006121, Phase 3, Completed, Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; results first posted 2019-07-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Clinical Trial of Apomorphine Subcutaneous Infusion in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease. Trials, record NCT02006121. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02006121

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Clinical Trial of Apomorphine Subcutaneous Infusion in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease
NCT number
NCT02006121
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
107 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Conditions
Parkinson's Disease
Interventions
Apomorphine hydrochloride, Placebo
First posted
2013-12-09
Last updated
2019-07-08
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-000980-10
Results first posted
2019-07-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change in Daily OFF Time From Baseline (Start of Blinded Treatment) to the End of Double-blind Phase (Visit 10) Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
The least squares mean reduction (improvement) in OFF time as reported by the patient using the Hauser Parkinson's disease home diary. Patients categorised their motor symptoms into OFF, ON with dyskinesia, ON without troublesome dyskinesia or sleeping using half hour blocks over 24 hours. Daily OFF time was computed from the average of valid motor diaries from the two days preceding each visit. Correct diary completion was evaluated during screening and observed by the investigator to ensure patients could categorise their motor symptoms correctly. A diary was considered valid if no more than 4 half-hour periods were either absent or duplicated. There were no invalid diaries at Baseline or Week 12.
SecondaryMean Change in Daily Time Spent "ON Without Troublesome Dyskinesia" From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Visit 10), Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
The least squares mean change in "ON time without troublesome dyskinesia" as reported by the patient using the Hauser Parkinson's disease home diary. Each half hour of the day categorised as OFF, ON with dyskinesia, ON without troublesome dyskinesia or asleep. "ON time without troublesome dyskinesia" measures good ON time for a Parkinson's disease patient.
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Using the mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
PGIC is a self-administered questionnaire measuring personal general state of health on a 7-point rating scale. The 7 ordinal categories from which patients must choose are 'very much improved', 'much improved', 'minimally improved', 'no change', 'minimally worse', 'much worse', and 'very much worse. Results are presented as the % of patients who reported at least minimal improvement in general health status at week 12 compared to Baseline. A Wilcoxon range sum test was performed to test for treatment differences from baseline to end of 12 weeks' treatment period.
SecondaryMean Change in Oral Levodopa Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 Using MMRM for the mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
The least squares mean change in oral levodopa dose from Baseline to Visit 10 (week 12) was calculated excluding 3 centres who declined to participate in collecting the necessary details of PRN use of levodopa.
SecondaryMean Change in Levodopa Equivalent Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 (Week 12) Using MMRM in the mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
Levodopa equivalent dose is an indication of the burden of medication taken to control symptoms of Parkinson's disease with all medications other than levodopa itself being converted to a calculated levodopa dose using the methodology published by Tomlinson et al, 2010. The computation of LED excludes the study drug.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change in Daily OFF Time From Baseline (Start of Blinded Treatment) to the End of Double-blind Phase (Visit 10) Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
All randomised patients excluding those who had major protocol deviations who received at least one dose of trial medication during the course of the trial and for whom any post-baseline efficacy assessment is available.
HoursLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Daily Time Spent ON Without Troublesome Dyskinesia From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Visit 10), Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
All randomised patients excluding those who had major protocol deviations who received at least one dose of trial medication during the course of the trial and for whom any post-baseline efficacy assessment is available.
HoursLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Using the mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeks
All randomised patients excluding those who had major protocol deviations who received at least one dose of trial medication during the course of the trial and for whom any post-baseline efficacy assessment is available and who completed the PGIC questionnaire
% of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change in Oral Levodopa Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 Using MMRM for the mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeksAll patients who received at least one dose of randomized study medication and had at least one post-baseline observation for the primary endpointmgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Levodopa Equivalent Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 (Week 12) Using MMRM in the mITT PopulationBaseline and 12 weeksAll randomized patients treated at least once with study medication and who had at least one post-baseline observation for the primary endpointmgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change in Daily OFF Time From Baseline (Start of Blinded Treatment) to the End of Double-blind Phase (Visit 10) Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationApomorphine Hydrochloride-2.6195% Confidence Interval -3.43 to -1.80Hours
Mean Change in Daily OFF Time From Baseline (Start of Blinded Treatment) to the End of Double-blind Phase (Visit 10) Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationPlacebo-0.7595% Confidence Interval -1.66 to 0.16Hours
Mean Change in Daily Time Spent ON Without Troublesome Dyskinesia From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Visit 10), Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationApomorphine Hydrochloride2.9095% Confidence Interval 2.07 to 3.73Hours
Mean Change in Daily Time Spent ON Without Troublesome Dyskinesia From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Phase (Visit 10), Based on Patient Diaries Using MMRM mITT PopulationPlacebo0.8595% Confidence Interval -0.09 to 1.78Hours
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Using the mITT PopulationApomorphine Hydrochloride79.1% of participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Using the mITT PopulationPlacebo23.5% of participants
Mean Change in Oral Levodopa Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 Using MMRM for the mITT PopulationApomorphine Hydrochloride-242.0995% Confidence Interval -346.58 to -137.61mg
Mean Change in Oral Levodopa Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 Using MMRM for the mITT PopulationPlacebo-76.4695% Confidence Interval -185.17 to 32.25mg
Mean Change in Levodopa Equivalent Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 (Week 12) Using MMRM in the mITT PopulationApomorphine Hydrochloride-502.0295% Confidence Interval -626.45 to -377.60mg
Mean Change in Levodopa Equivalent Dose From Baseline to Visit 10 (Week 12) Using MMRM in the mITT PopulationPlacebo-150.8795% Confidence Interval -280.14 to -21.59mg

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double Blind PhaseSTARTEDApomorphine Hydrochloride54
Double Blind PhaseSTARTEDPlacebo53
Double Blind PhaseCOMPLETEDApomorphine Hydrochloride42
Double Blind PhaseCOMPLETEDPlacebo29
Double Blind PhaseNOT COMPLETEDApomorphine Hydrochloride12
Double Blind PhaseNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo24
Open Label PhaseSTARTEDApomorphine Hydrochloride84
Open Label PhaseSTARTEDPlacebo0
Open Label PhaseCOMPLETEDApomorphine Hydrochloride59
Open Label PhaseCOMPLETEDPlacebo0

Adverse events134

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInfusion site noduleGeneral disordersApomorphine Hydrochloride4698
otherInfusion site noduleGeneral disordersPlacebo053
otherInfusion site erythemaGeneral disordersApomorphine Hydrochloride1598
otherInfusion site erythemaGeneral disordersPlacebo253
otherInfusion site haematomaGeneral disordersApomorphine Hydrochloride898
otherInfusion site haematomaGeneral disordersPlacebo553
otherFatigueGeneral disordersApomorphine Hydrochloride698
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo153
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersApomorphine Hydrochloride798
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersPlacebo053

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityApomorphine Hydrochloride098
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo053
Total, other adverse eventsApomorphine Hydrochloride9498
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3053
Total, serious adverse eventsApomorphine Hydrochloride2398
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo253

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30055903DERIVEDPubMed
33486139DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Apomorphine Hydrochloride vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Apomorphine Hydrochloride vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02006121

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02006121/events?page=2