ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02008565

Controlling Anal Incontinence by Performing Anal Exercises With Biofeedback or Loperamide (CAPABLe)

NCT02008565, Phase 3, Completed, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network; results first posted 2018-11-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Controlling Anal Incontinence by Performing Anal Exercises With Biofeedback or Loperamide (CAPABLe). Trials, record NCT02008565. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02008565

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Controlling Anal Incontinence by Performing Anal Exercises With Biofeedback or Loperamide (CAPABLe)
NCT number
NCT02008565
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
300 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Conditions
Fecal Incontinence
Interventions
Loperamide, Placebo, Anal exercises with biofeedback, Usual Care
First posted
2013-12-11
Last updated
2018-11-20
Results first posted
2018-11-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score12 and 24 weeks
The primary outcome measure for all study arms is the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 24 weeks after treatment initiation to compare the marginal outcomes of anal exercise with biofeedback to usual care and loperamide to placebo. The St. Mark's (Vaizey) score, published in 1999, is commonly used in clinical studies and reports and was based on the Jorge-Wexner score but added two further items for assessment: the use of constipating medication and the presence of fecal urgency. Minimum score is 0 = perfect continence; maximum score is 24 = totally incontinent.
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life on Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)12 and 24 weeks
The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a 20-question, validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of an overall scale (range: 0-300) comprised of 3 sub-scales: 1) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (range: 0-100), 2) Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (range: 0-100), and 3) Urinary Distress Inventory (range: 0-100). The range of responses on the CRADI is 1-4 with (1) Not at all, (2) Somewhat, (3) Moderately, and (4), Quite a bit. Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the scale. The range of responses is: 0-100 with 0 (least distress) to 100 (most distress). Change = (Week \[12, 24\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.
SecondaryChange in Colorectal-Anal Subscale of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form (CRAIQ) Score12 and 24 weeks
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7) measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales of 7 questions each: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; range 0-100), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; range 0-100), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; range 0-100). The range of responses on the CRAIQ is 0-3 with (0) Not at all, (1) Somewhat, (2) Moderately, and (3), Quite a bit. Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a scale by 100 divided by 3. The range of responses is: 0-100 with 0 (least negative impact) to 100 (most negative impact). Change = (Week \[12, 24\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Accident-free Days at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of accident-free days at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of accident-free days at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries).
SecondaryChange From Baseline Pad-change Leaks Per Day at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per day resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries).
SecondaryChange From Baseline Pad-change Leaks Per Week at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per week resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries).
SecondaryChange From Baseline Total Number of Leaks Per Day at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in daily average FI episodes at 12 and 24 weeks and the daily average FI episodes at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries).
SecondaryChange in Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) Score12 and 24 weeks
The Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire (MMHQ) includes the 4-item Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), which measures the severity of liquid, solid, mucus, or gas incontinence that occurs from "2 or more times per day," "once per day," "2 or more times per week," "once a week," to "1-3 times per month." Patient-weighted scores were used to determine severity and scores ranged from 0-61, with higher scores indicating worse fecal incontinence (FI) severity. An FISI score of 0 indicated continence.
SecondaryParticipants With Improvement in Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score12 and 24 Weeks
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better), or 3 (a little better).
SecondaryChange From Baseline Resting Anal Canal Pressures (mm of Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm Insertion at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in resting anal canal pressures (mm Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm insertion at 12 and 24 weeks and resting anal canal pressures (mm Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm insertion at baseline

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Quality of Life on Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Colorectal-Anal Subscale of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form (CRAIQ) Score12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Accident-free Days at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
accident-free daysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Pad-change Leaks Per Day at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
pad-change leaks per dayMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Pad-change Leaks Per Week at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
pad-change leaks per weekMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Total Number of Leaks Per Day at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
leaks per dayMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) Score12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYParticipants With Improvement in Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score12 and 24 Weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Resting Anal Canal Pressures (mm of Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm Insertion at 12 and 24 Weeks12 and 24 weeks
An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed for primary analyses. ITT analysis included all eligible participants who were randomized. The primary analyses included randomized patients who provided outcome data at 12 or 24 weeks.
resting anal canal pressure (mm Hg)MEAN

Results by group112

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScoreLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback12 Week St. Mark's Score-5.595% Confidence Interval -7.2 to -3.9units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScorePlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback12 Week St. Mark's Score-4.495% Confidence Interval -6.0 to -2.8units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScoreLoperamide - Education Only12 Week St. Mark's Score-4.595% Confidence Interval -6.1 to -2.9units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScorePlacebo - Education Only12 Week St. Mark's Score-3.495% Confidence Interval -6.0 to -0.8units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScoreLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback24 Week St. Mark's Score-9.795% Confidence Interval -11.9 to -7.5units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScorePlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback24 Week St. Mark's Score-5.995% Confidence Interval -8.1 to -3.7units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScoreLoperamide - Education Only24 Week St. Mark's Score-6.295% Confidence Interval -8.1 to -4.2units on a scale
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) ScorePlacebo - Education Only24 Week St. Mark's Score-4.595% Confidence Interval -7.1 to -1.9units on a scale
Change in Quality of Life on Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback12 Week CRADI Score-16.395% Confidence Interval -22.4 to -10.1units on a scale
Change in Quality of Life on Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback12 Week CRADI Score-13.195% Confidence Interval -19.2 to -7.1units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback86
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback84
Overall StudySTARTEDLoperamide - Education Only88
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo - Education Only42
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback85
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback83
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLoperamide - Education Only86
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo - Education Only42
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback1

Adverse events144

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback4865
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback6846
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersLoperamide - Education Only6887
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo - Education Only1421
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback4864
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback5845
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersLoperamide - Education Only7889
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo - Education Only5425
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback448661
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback198422

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback086
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback184
Total, all-cause mortalityLoperamide - Education Only088
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo - Education Only042
Total, other adverse eventsLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback7186
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback6084
Total, other adverse eventsLoperamide - Education Only6088
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo - Education Only2642
Total, serious adverse eventsLoperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback686
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback584

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31320277DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants9

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U01HD069031Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center (U01)GANTZ, MARIE GRESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTEEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2011 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD041261Perioperative Pelvic Floor Rehab: A Rrandomized TrialRICHTER, HOLLY EUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2001 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD041267Pelvic Floor Disorders Network - Duke University Clinical SiteVISCO, ANTHONY GDUKE UNIVERSITYEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2001 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD054214Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkLUKACZ, EMILY S.UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGOEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2006 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD054215Cleveland Clinic Clinical SiteBARBER, MATTHEW DCLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRUEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2006 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD069006Pittsburgh Pelvic Floor Research ProgramZYCZYNSKI, HALINA MMAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATIONEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2011 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD069010Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)ARYA, LILY AUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2011 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD069013Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network SiteSUNG, VIVIAN WWOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLANDEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2011 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10HD069025RCT of Hypnotherapy vs Tpolterodine for OAB: Voiding and Brain Activation ChangesROGERS, REBECCA GLENNUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTREUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2011 to 2015NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02008565

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02008565/results?page=2